How old is our creation really?

Yes, I think you can breed out materiel but you can't add information is what I believe or make it so scarce in a population ..
I had seen a type rabbit that had migrated to 3 different climate regions, 1 could breed with only one other and I think one could still breed with both others ..

Go for it. I purchased this when it first came out. I also listened to it again on audible many years later. Like two years ago lol.

https://store.khouse.org/products/cosmic-codes

Chuck Missler (God rest his soul) is the real deal. The man had credentials, Intelligence, savvy and real-world experience and he was quite well connected to high-level officials in the military and business.

This is going to sound crazy. But if you read as much is I have you will find that there is definitely certain evidence that indicates that everything is in fact revolving around the earth,
and that the earth is in fact the center of the universe.

And this is not some ancient myth I'm talking about this is the absolute latest data from from the latest and most sophisticated satellites up there.

Look up the WMAP and Planck Satellites, and the Sloan Digital sky survey. Also check out quantized redshifts data. Also check out quasar data. Check out the work oh Halton Arp.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23301-planck-shows-almost-perfect-cosmos-plus-axis-of-evil/

I have happened to study an enormous amount of data on this particular issue. And I can assure you that it is no joke my friend.

How will we know the difference wether they don’t want or simply can’t?

They can already add “information” of a donor to DNA. But then again, this needs to be inseminated later on. It needs to be born. In nature, without humans messing around, these genes can only be brought together by intercourse. Eugenics of this day is held back by ethical restraints, but they can go far in genetic engineering. They can add or remove stuff in DNA before insimination. (Yes this has limits but still....)

When observing natural selection in nature we see evolution is not so blind but driven on purpose. Selection happens by choice on some level. Choice/selection by consciousness makes the whole an intelligent design.

Selective pressures favoring random mutations is not intelligent design. Ecology drives speciation. Mimicry evolution to many at first seems like a directed path. But it’s not.

Look up the evolution of Heliconiine butterflies and passionflowers as mimicry.

I would disagree, Chuck Missler bought into every fantasy imaginable, Nephilim Demons and Humans procreating, Secret Bible Codes, on and on

This matrix we call the universe might as well be a 2D image being projected as a 3D hologram.
Anyone seen Interstellar? What if that movie was based on people channeling through the Akashafields?
Contact from another space in time...

Yes environmental pressures drives speciation.
The critical flaw in your theory is: Useful new information is never added to the CODE.
All throughout biological history information has only ever been lost. Either through extinction or speciation at the very limits of its DNA signal bandwidth.

Not at all. I’m not trying to sound like a jerk but I’m probably going to withdraw. I’m not saying y’all are dumb, but it’s evident that no one here has even the basics of 8th grade biology understood. Almost every other statement is so wrong I don’t even know how far back to actually go to explain it. I can’t imagine anyone here had read in the last decade even 1,000 pages worth of biological evolution. It seems that many here read creationist blogs that select random statements from studies that they are misunderstanding on purse or ignorance to frame a point that does not even exist within the study. Like the soft tissue found in T. rex. Tons of creationist sites and creationists quoted it without ever realizing that the scientist who found it is a Christian who believes all evidence supports evolution and writes how how that’s possible.

I feel as if for me personally it’s a pearl and swine type deal. The majority here don’t understand the subject and have next done contextual analysis of genesis 1-11 and so their position is not one of a academic understanding but a emotional attachment. No one here responding has googled what I mentioned and read even 3 papers on it. So I’m not wasting time. Instead, I’ll go through each chapter and write out my theological and scientific process of understanding it post it over the next few years as time permits.

I agree about Chuck Missler too .. He has some great stuff but I think maybe some off base stuff too .. I suspected Chuck moved to NZ probably because he thought what Bush didn't finish, Obama would .. I sure was ready to get out but I was stuck having to work .. And I think when another NWO liberal gets elected by the dummies in America the stock market will crash liKe never before .. It was pretty low when Trump got elected because America was done financially ..

BTW, The Bible goes to extremes to make it utterly clear that the flood was absolutely worldwide.

I sure wish I could find these books that you are reading. Do you have any sources that I should know about?

Selective pressures favoring random mutations is not intelligent design. Ecology drives speciation. Mimicry evolution to many at first seems like a directed path. But it’s not.

Look up the evolution of Heliconiine butterflies and passionflowers as mimicry.

When I say ''add information'' I'm talking about like the fruit fly experiments .. The fruit flies DNA was damaged and warped in every way imaginable by dumb scientists, their juvenile thought imaginations, and experiments but they could not create any new DNA info material and certainly no beneficial info .. Who knows how many thousands of generations of fruit flies laboratory breeding involved and never anything but poor ole fruit fly with never any good mutation or new DNA info added .. Like as if GOD needed help or missed something 6000 years ago concerning fruit flies .. What then when God the Master says in His Word ''it was very good'' ?..
31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

I fully agree bro.

But in eugenics they can add some stuff. They can now take genetic flaws out of the father and mother and replace them with a more healthy donor. So the baby born is from the mother and father, but has some parts from a different donor.
The only thing holding this back now is ethical restraint.

There is no scientific evidence of a single giant flood covering the entire planet earth

The Genesis model I was taught holds that the entire land mass of the earth was covered under frozen waters which is based upon Genesis 1:2.

While that statement is not presented as scientific evidence because it isn't, but it is a hypothesis;

However, when one applies the water to ice ratio to the current water to land ratio it indicates that the waters on the earth would raise to vertical height above the median surface level of 2,700 feet above sea level and as well has have a horizontally expansion rate necessary to cover the entire land mass of the earth. That statement is not a hypothesis, but a axiom.

Just for shizzle and giggles, since you don't believe what is written the OT about heavenly things then do believe what is written in the NT about earthly things? For example Luke 4:5?

The Genesis model I was taught holds that the entire land mass of the earth was covered under frozen waters which is based upon Genesis 1:2.

While that statement is not presented as scientific evidence because it isn't, but it is a hypothesis;

However, when one applies the water to ice ratio to the current water to land ratio it indicates that the waters on the earth would raise to vertical height above the median surface level of 2,700 feet above sea level and as well has have a horizontally expansion rate necessary to cover the entire land mass of the earth. That statement is not a hypothesis, but a axiom.

Just for shizzle and giggles, since you don't believe what is written the OT about heavenly things then do believe what is written in the NT about earthly things? For example Luke 4:5?