In 1 Corinthians 14 Paul is not encouraging the use of tongues but correcting the misuse of it say that people are zealous of spiritual gifts, seek that ye may excel to the edifying of the church.” . Tongues is not for edifying the church and is the least of the supernatural gifts. Yet they are the modern most wished for and mistaught. 1 Corinthians does not say they will continue but for you to seek more profitable gifts. This chapter is for correcting the wrong desire not encouraging it
Faith alone should result into actions. A person will become what they read. They will separate themselves from the world in appearance, in the way they conduct themselves and speak.Regardless of how sincerely a person believes that faith alone theology will save them, it will not.
There are no verses, not one that supports faith alone theology. Those who advance this doctrine will point to verses that reference the need for faith but are unable to explain the obvious lack of any verbiage that would cause the reader to assume the verse is all-encompassing.
This is the hole in their logic.
This is the problem that they refuse to address.
This is what they are blind to.
There is no allegorizing in his comment.well, that is a great example of Allegorizing scripture which is improper Biblical Interpretation.
Regardless of how sincerely a person believes that faith alone theology will save them, it will not.
There are no verses, not one that supports faith alone theology. Those who advance this doctrine will point to verses that reference the need for faith but are unable to explain the obvious lack of any verbiage that would cause the reader to assume the verse is all-encompassing.
This is the hole in their logic.
This is the problem that they refuse to address.
This is what they are blind to.
that is your opinion.There is no allegorizing in his comment.
The irony is that the only allegorizing is your silly attempt of using the "Jesus the Bread of Life" comment for manna.
Also, the following:
The gift of manna ceased without a proclamation.
The gift of tongues ceased without a proclamation.
is not interpretation, it is simply the actuality that we live in.
If you believe we are living in an age of the miraculous as during the New Testament then you are delusional as well as ignorant.
Nothing personal but you seem rather uneducated as well.
There is no allegorizing in his comment.
The irony is that the only allegorizing is your silly attempt of using the "Jesus the Bread of Life" comment for manna.
Also, the following:
The gift of manna ceased without a proclamation.
The gift of tongues ceased without a proclamation.
is not interpretation, it is simply the actuality that we live in.
If you believe we are living in an age of the miraculous as during the New Testament then you are delusional as well as ignorant.
Nothing personal but you seem rather uneducated as well.
Are you really asking me to present a verse that "the gift of tongues ceased with out a proclamation"?"The gift of tongues ceased without a proclamation."
Only if you could prove that with the word of GOD.
If you think that the gift of manna from heaven to the Israelites ceasing is an opinion then you are a dunce.that is your opinion.
yes if you can LOL.Are you really asking me to present a verse that "the gift of tongues ceased with out a proclamation"?
I want you to go lay down and think about what you just wrote. Again, this is not personal but you are not an educated person.
You can name call all you like just provide Bible ok most cowards name call when the person is not in front of them. Just provide the biblical support ok. Please read what I said. I never said gift of manna from heaven to the Israelites ceasing is an opinion. I said everyone has their opinion. No need to get person just deal with John chapter 6 and Provide the text that states Tongues have stopped and are not for today. simple.If you think that the gift of manna from heaven to the Israelites ceasing is an opinion then you are a dunce.
Regardless of your allegory about Jesus being the Bread of Life, the manna ceased!
Did you finish high school?
you can make any comment you like just provide chapter and verse. What you say means nothing without Chapter and verse.Are you really asking me to present a verse that "the gift of tongues ceased with out a proclamation"?
I want you to go lay down and think about what you just wrote. Again, this is not personal but you are not an educated person.
Did you not lie down and think about what you wrote?you can make any comment you like just provide chapter and verse. What you say means nothing without Chapter and verse.
If you don't see what Jesus said about Manna in John chapter 6 then that is your issue not mine.
are you ok show me where I said proclamation in any one of my post. I think you have been up late. it was not I who used that term. Were done ok. I will leave you to yourself and your understanding we will not agree and that ok. Have nice day.Did you not lie down and think about what you wrote?
Okay, how about this.
Show me the chapter and verse that states the gifts of manna and tongues must have a Biblical proclamation before ceasing.
While we are at it, show me the chapter and verse that states what is being called tongues today is the same as New Testament tongues.
Whoever you have reading these comments to you is not paying attention.If you don't see what Jesus said about Manna in John chapter 6 then that is your issue not mine.
again you can eat the red herringWhoever you have reading these comments to you is not paying attention.
I have answered this already in post #2349.
Again, whatever Jesus said in John 6 about Him being the Bread of Life does not change the fact that the gift of manna ceased without a proclamation.
You are just presenting this as a red herring.
Those who become filled with Holy Spirit and speak in tongues do so through an act of faith. The experience doesn't occur before a willingness to believe. We are to believe what God has revealed concerning any topic in order for the associated reality to come to pass. That's called Faith.See now we have a modern day delima. We have scripture that clearly teach that the gifts of witness will cease when there purpose is fulfilled. Then some cling to personal experience over recorded word. here is a study on recorded word.Did Tongues Serve a Temporary Purpose?
A Biblical Teaching Outline
I. Define the Question Biblically (Not Experientially)
Key issue:
Not “Do people claim tongues today?”
But “What does the New Testament teach about their purpose and duration?”
2 Corinthians 5:7 — “For we walk by faith, not by sight.”
Doctrine must rest on revelation, not experience.
II. What the Bible Clearly Says Tongues Are
A. Tongues are a sign, not a norm
1 Corinthians 14:22
“Tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not.”
Audience: Unbelievers
Function: Witness / confirmation
Source: Isaiah 28:11–12 (judgment sign to unbelieving Israel)
B. Tongues confirm the spoken word
Mark 16:20
“Confirming the word with signs following”
Hebrews 2:3–4
“God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders…”
Tongues are tied to:
Oral proclamation
Foundational revelation
Divine authentication
III. Where Tongues Appear in the Biblical Record
A. Directly given by the Spirit (no hands)
Acts 2:1–4 — Jews
Acts 10:44–46; 11:15 — Gentiles
B. Given through apostolic hands
Acts 8:17 — Samaritans
Acts 19:6 — Disciples of John
Observation:
Tongues appear only at key redemptive transitions:
Jew
Samaritan
Gentile
No repeated pattern beyond this foundational period.
IV. What the Epistles Do With Tongues
A. Regulation, not expansion
1 Corinthians 12–14 correct misuse
Tongues ranked lower than:
prophecy
understanding
edification
1 Corinthians 14:19
“Five words… than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue.”
B. Paul explicitly says tongues will cease
1 Corinthians 13:8
“Whether there be tongues, they shall cease.”
The question is when, not if.
V. When Do Tongues Cease According to the Text?
A. When their purpose is fulfilled
Signs confirm revelation
Revelation becomes recorded Scripture
Jude 3 — “The faith… once for all delivered”
John 20:31 — “These are written, that ye might believe”
B. When faith shifts from signs to Scripture
Luke 16:31
“If they hear not Moses and the prophets…”
2 Timothy 3:16–17
Scripture makes the man of God complete
No verse says:
tongues continue to confirm Scripture
signs are needed after the record is complete
VI. The Narrative Trajectory of the New Testament
Acts — Signs appear, spread, authenticate
Early Epistles — Gifts regulated and restrained
Later Epistles — Tongues not mentioned
No text records tongues after apostolic foundation
Silence is not proof — but it points in a direction.
VII. What the Bible Does Not Say (Important)
The Bible never says:
Tongues continue until the end of the church age
Tongues are the normal evidence for all believers
Tongues are needed to sustain faith
Continuation requires inference; cessation fits textual flow.
VIII. Final Biblical Conclusion
Tongues were a sign for unbelievers
Tongues confirmed spoken revelation
Revelation has been fully delivered and recorded
Faith now rests in what is written
The text leans toward tongues having served their purpose
Continuation today relies more on experience than explicit Scripture
1 Corinthians 13:13
“Now abideth faith, hope, charity… but the greatest of these is charity.”
Brother This dude is stuck on Oral proclamation he says :Those who become filled with Holy Spirit and speak in tongues do so through an act of faith. The experience doesn't occur before a willingness to believe. We are to believe what God has revealed concerning any topic in order for the associated reality to come to pass. That's called Faith.
1 Corinthians 13:8-10 states that tongues will cease when "the perfect" comes. There is nothing more perfect than Jesus and the age He will usher in. It is at that point that gifts will no longer be necessary because they will be replaced by direct knowledge.
The Bible reveals that speaking in tongues is a sign used to draw unbelievers and for edification of believers. The idea that these needs no longer exist couldn't be further from the truth.
Note: Believers expect to speak in tongues upon being filled with the Holy Ghost. Scripture records the absence of evidence revealed the infilling of the Holy Ghost had not taken place and the assistance of others was necessary. (Acts 8:12-18, 19:1-7)
Clearly we disagree.No one here is debating that tongues is evidence of the Holy Spirit. The Bible is clear on this issue.
But this is a strawman and I will not bite.
The question remains the same.
Is modern day glossolalia the same as the physical supernatural manifestations of tongues recorded in the New Testament?
The reality is no.
Well the comment is correct, but misses the point that there purpose has not yet fulfilled: The Bible reveals that speaking in tongues is the sign God uses to draw unbelievers and for edification of believers. And as I said, the idea that these needs no longer exist couldn't be further from the truth.Brother This dude is stuck on Oral proclamation he says :
"We have scripture that clearly teach that the gifts of witness will cease when there purpose is fulfilled."
Yet he did not provide one verse that said just that. No one he went on a incoherent biblical rant. One would get a neck injury with all the jumping around to Manipulate scripture to support a false Narrative. Don't cast your Peals. he is deranged.