Acts 2:38 Comparison: Evangelical vs. Oneness / Baptismal-Regeneration View

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Acts 10:43 -To Him all the prophets witness that, through His name, whoever believes in Him receives remission of sins.

Acts 13:38 - Therefore let it be known to you, brethren, that through this Man is preached to you the forgiveness of sins; 39 and by Him everyone who believes is justified from all things from which you could not be justified by the law of Moses.

Acts 26:18 - to open their eyes, in order to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who are sanctified by faith in Me.

That's when. The moment we believe in/place faith in Jesus Christ for salvation.
You are not addressing the "when" you are addressing the "what".

Faith is "what" saves us but it is not the "when".

Your three verses are rather general in nature and does not express the specific path that the Bible gives to us for the remission of sins.

Peter believed and trusted that there would be a coin in the mouth of the fish but the path to getting the coin was a physical action.

This is what pushers of Faith Alone Regeneration Theology cannot grasp.

Regardless of how sincere the trust of the virgins in the coming of the Bridegroom, it was the physical lack of oil that kept them out of the banquet.

Did they believe? Yes.
Were they waiting for the right Person? Yes.
Were they waiting in the right place? Yes.

Why were they denied entry? They were missing the required oil. Their sincere faith could not replace the need for the physical oil.

A symbol (water baptism) is not the reality but is a picture of the reality.
Jesus states:

"Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned."

This is no symbol!!!

It's the moment that we believe in/place faith in Jesus Christ for salvation.
A moment of belief, regardless of how sincere is not the occasion of the remission of sins.

The Apostle Peter states:

“Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ so that your sins may be forgiven; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."

Peter states this to sincere believers.

No general verse about the need for faith can negate the need for water baptism.
You must read your pet verse "Acts 2:38" alongside verses like (Luke 24:47; Acts 3:19; 5:31; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 13:38-39; 15:7-9; 16:31; 26:18) where forgiveness is explicitly tied to repentance/belief/faith and not the ritual itself. Water baptism is a sign of that reality but not the source of it.
Instead of harmonizing the verses you are following the Faith Alone Regeneration Theology handbook of negating verses such as Acts 2:38, Mark 16:16, 1st Peter 3:21, Acts 22:16, Romans 6:3-7, Matthew 28:19, Eph. 4:5, Mark 1:4, John 3:5 in order to protect your pet theology.

The only logical and Biblical conclusion when properly harmonizing scripture with scripture is that faith in Jesus Christ "implied in repentance" (rather than water baptism) brings the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit. (Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 5:31; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 13:38-39; 15:7-9; 16:31; 26:18) *Perfect Harmony*
You can "only" see this conclusion because you are neck deep into this theology.

You fail to properly harmonize scripture with scripture before reaching your conclusion on doctrine. Apart from becoming a child of God through belief/faith (John 1:12; Galatians 3:26) leaves one without a wedding garment.
You feel the need to harmonize these verses, I believe they are clearly already in harmony. No need to negate or down grade any of them. The King called the guest "friend" and the guest was invited and showed up on time but he lacked something physical, something simple, free and easy to acquire.
 
You are not addressing the "when" you are addressing the "what".

Faith is "what" saves us but it is not the "when".
Faith is the "what" and the "when." We are saved the very moment that we place our faith in Jesus Christ for salvation. Ephesians 2:8 - For by grace you have been saved through faith, (not faith and baptism) and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, 9 not of works, lest anyone should boast.

Romans 5:1 - Therefore, having been justified by faith, (not faith and baptism) we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, 2 through whom also we have access by faith into this grace in which we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.

Your three verses are rather general in nature and does not express the specific path that the Bible gives to us for the remission of sins.
Acts 10:43, 13:38-39; 26:18 are all clear that remission of sins happens the moment we believe/placed faith in Jesus Christ for salvation. Those verses only sound general to those who try to "shoehorn" works "into" salvation through faith.

Peter believed and trusted that there would be a coin in the mouth of the fish but the path to getting the coin was a physical action.
Salvation is through faith, not faith + physical actions/works. (Romans 4:4-6)

This is what pushers of Faith Alone Regeneration Theology cannot grasp.
I can grasp and accept that Jesus Christ saves us through faith based on the merits of His finished work of redemption alone and not based on the merits of our works. (Romans 3:24-26; Titus 3:5; 2 Timothy 1:9) ✝️

That salvation is by grace through faith and is not by works is not hard to understand. It's just hard for works-salvationists to accept. It is through faith "in Jesus Christ alone" (and not based on the merits of our works) that we are justified on account of Christ (Romans 4:5-6; 5:1; 5:9); yet the faith that justifies does not remain alone (unfruitful, barren) if it is genuine. (James 2:14-24) *Perfect Harmony* This is what pushers of baptismal regeneration theology cannot grasp.

Regardless of how sincere the trust of the virgins in the coming of the Bridegroom, it was the physical lack of oil that kept them out of the banquet.

Did they believe? Yes.
Were they waiting for the right Person? Yes.
Were they waiting in the right place? Yes.
The wording of the five foolish virgins is all too familiar to the reader of Matthew’s Gospel: Matthew 25:11 - "Later, the other virgins came too, saying, ‘Lord, lord! Let us in!’ 12 But he replied, ‘I tell you the truth, I do not know you!" Matthew 7:21 - "Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the kingdom of heaven" but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven - (See John 6:40). 22 On that day, many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, didn’t we prophesy in your name, and in your name cast out demons and do many powerful works?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’ (Matthew 7:22-23) That is a misplaced trust. Lord, Lord, didn't "WE." Works salvation is no salvation at all.

The difference between the foolish virgins and the wise virgins is that the wise virgins had oil for their lamps, while the foolish virgins did not. The wise virgins had the opportunity to obtain oil and did so. The foolish virgins had plenty of opportunity to get oil but did not. It's possible to be in close contact with Christ, and with Christians, and yet not be saved. I am reminded of a similar passage in the Gospel of Luke:

Luke 13:23 - Someone asked him, "Lord, will only a few be saved?" So, he said to them, 24 "Exert every effort to enter through the narrow door, because many, I tell you, will try to enter and will not be able to. 25 Once the head of the house gets up and shuts the door, then you will stand outside and start to knock on the door and beg him, ‘Lord, let us in!’ But he will answer you, ‘I don’t know where you come from.’ 26 Then you will begin to say, ‘We ate and drank in your presence, and you taught in our streets.’ 27 But he will reply, ‘I don’t know where you come from! Go away from me, all you evildoers!’ 28 There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth when you see Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and all the prophets in the kingdom of God but you yourselves thrown out. 29 Then people will come from east and west, and from north and south, and take their places at the banquet table in the kingdom of God. 30 But indeed, some are last who will be first, and some are first who will be last."

Jesus may indeed be warning us in this parable that there will be a number of people who look like Christians, who associate with Christians, and who even think they are Christians, who will be shocked to learn that they are not saved at the return of our Lord and Christ never knew them. What a sobering thought!

Why were they denied entry? They were missing the required oil. Their sincere faith could not replace the need for the physical oil.
They did not have sincere faith but superficial faith that lacked substance.

Jesus states:

"Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned."

This is no symbol!!!
Mark 16:16 - He who believes and is baptized will be saved (general cases without making a qualification for the unusual case of someone who believes but is not baptized) but he who does not believe will be condemned. The omission of baptized with "does not believe" shows that Jesus does not make baptism absolutely necessary for salvation. Condemnation rests on unbelief and not on a lack of baptism. *NOWHERE does the Bible say, "baptized or condemned." Baptism is the picture of the new life but not the means of securing it.

If water baptism was absolutely required for salvation, then we would expect Jesus to mention it in the following verses. (3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26) Yet what is the ONE requirement that Jesus mentions NINE different times in each of these complete statements *BELIEVES. *What happened to baptism *Hermeneutics. If he wo believes shall be saved then he who believes and is baptized shall be saved as well.

John 3:18 - He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO) does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO) because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

A moment of belief, regardless of how sincere is not the occasion of the remission of sins.
Saving belief in Christ continues (Matthew 13:23) and is not some shallow, momentary belief that has no root, produces no fruit and withers away.

CONTINUED..
 
The Apostle Peter states:

“Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ so that your sins may be forgiven; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."

Peter states this to sincere believers.
In Acts 2:37, their "belief" at this point was "mental assent" that Jesus was the Messiah, and they were guilty of crucifying Him. *That is not saving belief yet. They still needed to repent change their mind further and believe in Jesus unto salvation as we see in (Acts 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:7-9; 20:21).

In Acts 2:38, "for the remission of sins" does not refer back to both clauses, "you all repent" and "each one of you be baptized," but refers only to the first. Peter is saying "repent unto the remission of your sins," the same as in Acts 3:19. The clause "each one of you be baptized" is parenthetical. This is exactly what Acts 3:19 teaches except that Peter omits the parenthesis.

*Also compare the fact that these Gentiles in Acts 10:45 received the gift of the Holy Spirit (compare with Acts 2:38 - the gift of the Holy Spirit) and this was BEFORE water baptism. (Acts 10:47)

In Acts 10:43 we read ..whoever believes in Him receives remission of sins. Again, these Gentiles received the gift of the Holy Spirit - Acts 10:45 - when they believed on the Lord Jesus Christ - Acts 11:17 - (compare with Acts 16:31 - Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved) BEFORE water baptism - Acts 10:47. This is referred to as repentance unto life - Acts 11:18.

*So, the only Biblical conclusion when properly harmonizing scripture with scripture is that faith in Jesus Christ "implied in genuine repentance" (rather than water baptism) brings the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit (Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 5:31; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 13:38-39; 15:7-9; 16:31; 26:18). *Perfect Harmony*

No general verse about the need for faith can negate the need for water baptism.
No verse on water baptism can negate the fact that man is saved through belief/faith "apart from additions or modifications." (Luke 7:50; 8:12; John 1:12; 3:15,16,18,36; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26; Acts 4:4; 10:4; 10:43; 13:38,39; 15:7-9; 16:31; 26:18; Romans 1:16; 3:24-28; 4:5-6, 9: 5:1; 10:4; 1 Corinthians 1:21; Galatians 2:16; 3:6-14, 26; Ephesians 1:13; 2:8,9; Philippians 3:9; 2 Timothy 3:15; Hebrews 10:39; 1 John 5:4, 13 etc..)

Instead of harmonizing the verses you are following the Faith Alone Regeneration Theology handbook of negating verses such as Acts 2:38, Mark 16:16, 1st Peter 3:21, Acts 22:16, Romans 6:3-7, Matthew 28:19, Eph. 4:5, Mark 1:4, John 3:5 in order to protect your pet theology.
Harmonizing scripture with scripture before reaching my conclusion on doctrine is not negating your pet verses. It's just putting them in their proper place. The remission of sins has three applications: 1. Literally, by the blood of Christ -Matthew 26:28 2. Experientially, by faith in Christ - Acts 26:18 3. Figuratively, by water baptism - Acts 22:16.

You can "only" see this conclusion because you are neck deep into this theology.
You can only see your conclusion because you are neck deep into your theology. It's the same with Roman Catholics, Mormons, Oneness Pentecostals and Campbellites who all teach salvation by water baptism (salvation by works).

You feel the need to harmonize these verses, I believe they are clearly already in harmony. No need to negate or down grade any of them.
Scripture MUST harmonize with scripture or else you end up with contradictions, as demonstrated by you. By downgrading salvation through faith to salvation by works you are downgrading Christ's finished work of redemption to IN-sufficient.

The King called the guest "friend" and the guest was invited and showed up on time but he lacked something physical, something simple, free and easy to acquire.
Jesus called Judas Iscariot "friend" (Matthew 26:50) and He also called him a devil! (John 6:70-71) Judas turned out to be an unbelieving, unclean devil who betrayed Jesus. (John 6:64-71; 13:10-11) The guest lacked a robe of righteousness/imputed righteousness that is only received through faith (Romans 4:5-6) and instead remained dressed in his own filthy rags of righteousness. (Isaiah 64:6) That was the heart of the issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlyingDove
Acts 10:43 -To Him all the prophets witness that, through His name, whoever believes in Him receives remission of sins.

Acts 13:38 - Therefore let it be known to you, brethren, that through this Man is preached to you the forgiveness of sins; 39 and by Him everyone who believes is justified from all things from which you could not be justified by the law of Moses.

Acts 26:18 - to open their eyes, in order to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who are sanctified by faith in Me.

That's when. The moment we believe in/place faith in Jesus Christ for salvation.

A symbol (water baptism) is not the reality but is a picture of the reality.

It's the moment that we believe in/place faith in Jesus Christ for salvation. ✝️

You must read your pet verse "Acts 2:38" alongside verses like (Luke 24:47; Acts 3:19; 5:31; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 13:38-39; 15:7-9; 16:31; 26:18) where forgiveness is explicitly tied to repentance/belief/faith and not the ritual itself. Water baptism is a sign of that reality but not the source of it.

The only logical and Biblical conclusion when properly harmonizing scripture with scripture is that faith in Jesus Christ "implied in repentance" (rather than water baptism) brings the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit. (Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 5:31; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 13:38-39; 15:7-9; 16:31; 26:18) *Perfect Harmony*

You fail to properly harmonize scripture with scripture before reaching your conclusion on doctrine. Apart from becoming a child of God through belief/faith (John 1:12; Galatians 3:26) leaves one without a wedding garment.
Regardless of how sincerely a person believes that faith alone theology will save them, it will not.

There are no verses, not one that supports faith alone theology. Those who advance this doctrine will point to verses that reference the need for faith but are unable to explain the obvious lack of any verbiage that would cause the reader to assume the verse is all-encompassing.

This is the hole in their logic.

This is the problem that they refuse to address.

This is what they are blind to.
 
Regardless of how sincerely a person believes that faith alone theology will save them, it will not.
Faith that trusts in Jesus Christ "alone" for salvation saves. (Romans 3:24-26; 4:5-6; 5:1; Ephesians 2:8,9 etc..). ✝️

are no verses, not one that supports faith alone theology. Those who advance this doctrine will point to verses that reference the need for faith but are unable to explain the obvious lack of any verbiage that would cause the reader to assume the verse is all-encompassing.
Romans 5:1 - Therefore, having been justified by faith, (apart from editions or modifications, hence faith alone) we have peace with God through are Lord Jesus Christ.

Ephesians 2:8 - For by grace you have been saved through faith, (apart from editions or modifications, hence faith alone) and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, 9 not of works, lest anyone should boast.

*So much for salvation by works.*

This is the hole in their logic.
Salvation by grace, through faith, not works is logical (except for the natural man - 1 Corinthians 2:14) and Biblical.

This is the problem that they refuse to address.
I have addressed your problem and your flawed logic that culminates in salvation by works on numerous occasions.

[/QUOTE] This is what they are blind to.[/QUOTE] Those who are blind teach salvation by works (Romans 4:6; 11:6; Titus 3:5; 2 Timothy 1:9) and refuse to believe the gospel. (2 Corinthians 4:3,4)
 
Noah in faith built an ark that saved his life and the life of his son, whose seed became the savior of the world who saved Noah.

Was Noah saved by faith alone?
Noah was already spiritually saved by faith alone prior to building the ark. Noah had already found grace in the eyes of the Lord and was a just man who walked with God (Genesis 6:8,9) before he built the ark. Building the ark was a demonstration of his faith which saved Noah and his family physically from drowning.
 
Noah was already spiritually saved by faith alone prior to building the ark. Noah had already found grace in the eyes of the Lord and was a just man who walked with God (Genesis 6:8,9) before he built the ark. Building the ark was a demonstration of his faith which saved Noah and his family physically from drowning.

Total dodge. The reality is that Noah would not have been saved apart from his work
 
Genesis 6:8, 9 wouldn't have saved Noah alone. His salvation required his work
Noah's faith alone would not have built the Ark. His building the Ark was not a work of merit but a necessary act.

If Noah in sincere faith, had decided that actually building the Ark was a work of salvation and so not built it, God would have found someone else to do it. Noah would have drowned holding on to his "faith alone" mentality.

Much like with Esther, God would have found someone else willing to act and not simply believe. (Esther 4:14)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wansvic
Faith that trusts in Jesus Christ "alone" for salvation saves. (Romans 3:24-26; 4:5-6; 5:1; Ephesians 2:8,9 etc..).
Typical Faith Alone Regeneration Theology, shoehorn a definitive into the verse and so change the passage into an all-encompassing statement. A clearly desperate attempt to defend a bogus narrative.
Romans 5:1 - Therefore, having been justified by faith, (apart from editions or modifications, hence faith alone) we have peace with God through are Lord Jesus Christ.

Ephesians 2:8 - For by grace you have been saved through faith, (apart from editions or modifications, hence faith alone) and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, 9 not of works, lest anyone should boast.

*So much for salvation by works.*



Acts 2:38
Peter said to them, “Change your hearts and lives and be baptized, each one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ. Then God will forgive your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.


1 Peter 3:21
and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also—not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a clear conscience toward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ,

James 2:24
You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.

*So much for salvation by faith alone*


Salvation by grace, through faith, not works is logical (except for the natural man - 1 Corinthians 2:14) and Biblical.
You are quoting a man who was water baptized in order to wash away his sins. Acts 22:16
 
  • Like
Reactions: hornetguy
Typical Faith Alone Regeneration Theology, shoehorn a definitive into the verse and so change the passage into an all-encompassing statement. A clearly desperate attempt to defend a bogus narrative.
So, your faith is clearly not exclusively in Jesus Christ for salvation but is in water baptism for salvation. To say that faith in Jesus Christ alone for salvation is IN-sufficient to save is to say that the OBJECT of our faith (Jesus Christ and His finished work of redemption) is the IN-sufficient means of our salvation. Adding works to salvation through faith, not works is your idea of all encompassing. Your bogus narrative culminates in trying to "shoehorn" works "into" salvation through faith, not works

Acts 2:38
Peter said to them, “Change your hearts and lives and be baptized, each one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ. Then God will forgive your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
I already thoroughly covered Acts 2:38 in post #2,044.

https://christianchat.com/bible-dis...egeneration-view.220967/page-103#post-5656562

1 Peter 3:21
and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also—not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a clear conscience toward God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ,
Peter tells us that baptism now saves you, yet when Peter uses this phrase, he continues in the same sentence to explain exactly what he means by it. He said that baptism now saves you-not the removal of dirt from the flesh (that is, not as an outward, physical act which washes dirt from the body--that is not what saves you), "but an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ" (that is, as an inward, spiritual transaction between God and the individual, a transaction that is symbolized by/signified in the outward ceremony of water baptism).

*Just as the eight people in the ark were "saved THROUGH water" as they were IN THE ARK. They were not literally saved "by" the water. Hebrews 11:7 is clear on this point (..built an ARK for the SAVING of his household--which is a type of Christ). *The context reveals that only the righteous (Noah and his family) were dry and therefore safe. In contrast, only the wicked in Noah's day came in contract with the water and they all perished.

James 2:24
You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.
James is not using the term "justified" in James 2:24 to mean "accounted as righteous" but is shown to be righteous. James is discussing the evidence of faith (says-claims to have faith but has no works/I will show you my faith by my works - James 2:14-18) and not the initial act of being accounted as righteous with God. (Romans 4:2-3)

*So much for salvation by faith alone*
It is through faith "in Jesus Christ alone" (and not based on the merits of our works) that we are justified on account of Christ (Romans 4:5-6; 5:1; 5:9); yet the faith that justifies does not remain alone (unfruitful, barren) if it is genuine. (James 2:14-24) *Perfect Harmony*

You are quoting a man who was water baptized in order to wash away his sins. Acts 22:16
His sins were washed away as he called on the name of the Lord and not literally by water baptism. The water is symbolic; the appeal to Christ’s name is the saving act. Romans 10:13 - For whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.

The remission of sins has three applications: 1. Literally, by the blood of Christ - Matthew 26:28 2. Experientially, by faith in Christ - Acts 26:18 3. Figuratively, by water baptism - Acts 22:16

Excellent article on Acts 22:16 - WHAT IS TRUTH: Acts 22:16--Baptism Essential for Salvation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlyingDove