I agree that he was probably suffering from PTSD and that he should have been given time with a counselor before returning to active duty, but if's and but's are just fairy dust.The ICE shooting is a textbook example of how important it is to deprogram personnel before returning them to active duty. I’m aware that we have to let the investigation proceed before reaching conclusions, but the knowledge that the ICE agent probably was suffering from PTSD shows that government agencies have a long way to go when it comes to taking care of their employees.
I have analyzed the videos from the incident the best way I know how, and as of now, the most likely scenario is that the driver of the car did not pose a threat to the agent. On the other side, a person suffering from PTSD, is experiencing a situation differently from what is considered normal.
What I’m saying is that this is not really on the victim nor the shooter, but on a failed system that doesn’t care about the psychological damage caused by the service, regardless of branch.
However, I listened to a lawyer go through the law on this and seems very straight forward that the car was an imminent threat that justified the use of lethal action. After pulling out the gun she did turn away from him, but prior to that she gunned it with him standing in front of the car and there is no way for anyone at that moment to know if she would run him over or not.