Debating this point is like debating the colour of the sky.They aren't worth a watch.
Proverbs 18:13 He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.
Debating this point is like debating the colour of the sky.They aren't worth a watch.
Debating this point is like debating the colour of the sky.
Proverbs 18:13 He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.
Debating this point is like debating the colour of the sky.
Proverbs 18:13 He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.
True, maybe it's a stress reliever for both sides.Debating this point is like debating the colour of the sky.
Proverbs 18:13 He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.
[QUOTE="Charlesiii, post: 5600583, member: 343
This statement shows me you haven't taken the time to watch her podcasts.
That is fine, I also haven't watched her shows, but since I haven't watched them I also don't comment on them. This comment was made to someone who said she is not refuting with facts and hard evidence. It is deceitful that someone would make that claim if they had not watched the show.[/QUOTE]They aren't worth a watch.
You do not have to watch her shows. The facts of Owens are all over the internet. However, if you do watch a show, you start to wonder what is wrong with her. I know I did.
That is fine, I also haven't watched her shows, but since I haven't watched them I also don't comment on them. This comment was made to someone who said she is not refuting with facts and hard evidence. It is deceitful that someone would make that claim if they had not watched the show.[/QUOTE]They aren't worth a watch.
Well, I've heard enough of what she has recently said on several subjects and if I were a friend of hers I'd be getting help for her. She's fallen so far down the rabbit hole she may never get back.
I'm having trouble finding outcry about Paul Pelosi being beaten almost to death with a hammer, and thousands of people losing their jobs for simply expressing their opinions of it, can someone help?
Well I have seen a number of stories about people who were considered crazy conspiracy theorists who went off the deep end only to later be proven correct and I have also seen many of deep state attempts to sow confusion and doubt by spreading wild stories loosely based on facts to realize I am not in a position to determine what is going on with her. She could be a mouthpiece for the deep state, or she could have seen something that has caused her to become unhinged. Whatever it is, I'll let the Lord deal with it.
If I were to make an educated guess I would say that the assassination of Charlie Kirk was more horrifying if you know the whole story than if you don't. Just an educated guess. It is possible she is horrified because she knows more of the story or it could be the DS is trying to paint anyone who questions the official narrative as looney tunes.
You're the example of why it is never good to allow skeptics,unbelievers,into a Christian community.This is a logically weak argument, unless you believe in a limited God - i.e. a god who was not strong enough to stop the bullet from killing Charlie Kirk, but strong enough to miraculously stop the bullet from going through the other side of his neck? Just a laughable excuse by those preying on the emotions and faith of Christians to prevent this evil deed from being properly investigated. Perhaps the god of those who killed Charlie is limited in his abilities, but not the true God.
Imagine if police took this attitude with all murder investigations. "Well, we can't explain how the victim was murdered with the weapon we can't link to the scene, but we believe the unlinked weapon must have been the murder weapon, so once again, another act of God". Just a stupid argument for anyone who isn't superstitious.
No it doesn't.This statement shows me you haven't taken the time to watch her podcasts.
What hypocrisy to claim Charlie Kirk was a saint on one hand and on the other to be saying that unbelievers and skeptics should not be allowed to ask questions on a Christian forum.You're the example of why it is never good to allow skeptics,unbelievers,into a Christian community.
I used to see memes about him every now and then on Facebook but I never really paid any attention to himHas anyone else noticed that you've never even heard of this guy before the fake-church propaganda machine said worship him or else ?
Watch his memorial service and it becomes very clear all the politicians knew about him.I used to see memes about him every now and then on Facebook but I never really paid any attention to him
I used to see memes about him every now and then on Facebook but I never really paid any attention to him
Has anyone else noticed that you've never even heard of this guy before the fake-church propaganda machine said worship him or else ?
Watch his memorial service and it becomes very clear all the politicians knew about him.
It is very scary when the most powerful people in the world decorate the tomb of a martyr, and demand you worship him and if you question the official narrative you are labeled as an evil heretic.
No one demanded worship of Kirk. Actually, Kirk didn't even start the idea, a man named Steven Crowder did. The whole "change my mind" was his idea. He also has two children, he is 38 yrs old. People would feel the exact same way if they saw him murdered in cold blood in front of a college crowd he was speaking to. You could literally change the men and it would be the exact same story except for the fact he is divorced. But he said his ex-wife asked him not to go back to doing colleges but he felt that responsibility more than anyone else because he started it in the first place. He indeed is back on the road with high security and a bullet proof vest.