Charlie Kirk - so what now ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Doll said:
"They're going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza..."

Who are, " they" ?
/
Click to expand...

Charlie mentioned the Hamas attack. In context it seems to me that he is saying there was a false flag attack.
Minutes prior he said that everyone was idf. We see that in their draft and normal immediate response times.
It seems to everyone that the 6-9 hours that was a stand down of idf, was staged in order to get the 10 s of thousands scheduled to protest Netanyahu off his back. He suspended elections and has been a dictator in spite of those Israelis against him. The war redirected their attention from him as enemy of the people to Hamas. That gives that party unlimited power and the entire Gaza strip. Many billions of Americans dollars enriched the few who received it in Israel. It's a win for Netanyahu and his fellow $ recipients.

Who had the biggest motive is the second question when the attack happened. Who stands to gain?
The first one was, How do they expect us to believe that there was no armed response to the paragliders???
They think we are stupid?
No, they don't care.
Why?
They own American federal representatives. Senate and much of the house represent the Zionist billionaires and make big money by the legislation and allocation of American $.
You and I.....do we influence them?
Do they represent us?

These are questions I try to answer to gain my point of view.
 
I don't think too much more can be said for this topic so I will delist it from my watch list, but I suppose a fitting last cap to it is President Trump has posthumously awarded Charlie Kirk the Medal of Freedom and Erika Kirk accepted it on his behalf official. The Medal of Freedom is the highest civillian medal for exceptional citizens of the USA. Very befitting in my opinion and indeed Charlie Kirk was and still is worthy of the accolade. Though little side stories pertaining to the political and cultural climate and of course conspiracy theories will go on, I think this a most fitting conclusion to the main arch of the story pertaining to Charlie Kirk directly. A well earned legacy and though he was unjustly killed he will be justly remembered. Until the day of the Resurrection may he rest in peace, praise Jesus.

 
Has anyone else noticed that you've never even heard of this guy before the fake-church propaganda machine said worship him or else ?
 
I'm having trouble finding outcry about Paul Pelosi being beaten almost to death with a hammer, and thousands of people losing their jobs for simply expressing their opinions of it, can someone help?
 
  • Like
Reactions: seed_time_harvest
Let the people of God focus on the things of the Spirit.

Worthy is the Lamb
 
posthuman said:
Has anyone else noticed that you've never even heard of this guy before the fake-church propaganda machine said worship him or else ?
Click to expand...
I heard of him before he was assassinated.

I also agree that he was a Christian martyr, meaning he was assassinated because of his testimony for Christ.

That said I have noticed the "fake-church propaganda machine" attacking anyone who dares to question the official narrative as being "evil". But Jesus told us that the Fake church propaganda machine would decorate the tombs of the martyrs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charlesiii
posthuman said:
I'm having trouble finding outcry about Paul Pelosi being beaten almost to death with a hammer, and thousands of people losing their jobs for simply expressing their opinions of it, can someone help?
Click to expand...
Paul Pelosi was not a senator, nor was he killed. There was a deeply disturbed homosexual vagabond in his house, something that seems to be impossible considering the security on his house and neighborhood. This guy didn't drive into the neighborhood, there was no car. It seems he couldn't have possibly just walked in. The evidence was very compelling that Paul Pelosi actually brought him into the house and the evidence appeared to be that the entire story was censored so that all the reasonable questions were never answered. I feel very confident that if this were a failure of security then we would have heard a lot about that. Instead it was treated as a private matter.

Comparing these two events is apples to oranges. If you sneak a deranged man into your house who then attacks you with a hammer, and then when people ask questions there is a complete news blackout, sorry, that is not the same thing as a man being assassinated for speaking the word of God.
 
Doll said:
If you were there you saw the bullet strike Charlie in the side of the neck.
He was dead,instantly. He never knew what hit him.

Heaven you shot a rifle with .30-06 rounds?
Yes,that bullet should have blown through his neck and into those few people closest to his right side of the stage.
But it didn't.

Conspiracy theorists will project years after that horrible day and put forth their myths.

After all,there are those who think Tupac is still alive after having faked his death. When the butterfly filet of his thorax tissue iwas on the Net.

People would rather believe in conspiracies rather than an act of God.
Click to expand...
This is a logically weak argument, unless you believe in a limited God - i.e. a god who was not strong enough to stop the bullet from killing Charlie Kirk, but strong enough to miraculously stop the bullet from going through the other side of his neck? Just a laughable excuse by those preying on the emotions and faith of Christians to prevent this evil deed from being properly investigated. Perhaps the god of those who killed Charlie is limited in his abilities, but not the true God.

Imagine if police took this attitude with all murder investigations. "Well, we can't explain how the victim was murdered with the weapon we can't link to the scene, but we believe the unlinked weapon must have been the murder weapon, so once again, another act of God". Just a stupid argument for anyone who isn't superstitious.

Doll said:
And Owens is putting forth her own conspiracy theories. She's not refuting with facts and hard evidence. She's projecting because she can't deal with the facts.
Click to expand...
This statement shows me you haven't taken the time to watch her podcasts.
 
[QUOTE="Charlesiii, post: 5600583, member: 343

This statement shows me you haven't taken the time to watch her podcasts.[/QUOTE]


They aren't worth a watch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back