Why God the Father considered this fruit as forbidden?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Could I politely suggest that you try reading your posts before clicking on "Post reply"? That way, you might avoid sentences that don't make sense, like this one: "I believe in Lord Jesus that only those whose the recognition to Jesus is a revelation from God the Father will only reveal to them." If English isn't your first language, then I apologise, but if it is, you do need to check your posts, otherwise the rest of us can have no idea what you mean.

I'm sorry if this is only the best of English that I learned.
Let me rephrase with the best I can.

In the New Testament, the Jews basis of salvation was the word of God. And they claimed that their God is God the Father (John 8:41)
Since their recognition to Jesus is not a revelation from God the Father. So the truth never revealed to them by Jesus.

The Disciples of Jesus. Their recognition to Jesus is by means of revelation from God the Father (Matthew 16:15-17)
So Jesus revealed the truth to his disciples alone (MARK 4:34)

I believed in Lord Jesus that what he did in New Testament is what he is doing today.

You may ask what you don't understand. Please elaborate it.
 
In man's standard for good & evil.
Saul of Tarsus is evil. Because he his a murderer of Jesus Christ followers.
For the Disciples of Christ, Saul of Tarsus should not be forgiven.

In God's Standard for good & evil.
But in the eyes of God, Saul of Tarsus can be forgiven.
He was elected by Jesus Christ as a replacement of Judas Iscariot.
And he became Paul.
Actually, God’s word is the standard we use for both. He defines murder, though the Scripture does not tell us of a murder committed by Saul. God’s word is also the standard telling us to forgive.
 
I'm sorry if this is only the best of English that I learned.
Let me rephrase with the best I can.

In the New Testament, the Jews basis of salvation was the word of God. And they claimed that their God is God the Father (John 8:41)
Since their recognition to Jesus is not a revelation from God the Father. So the truth never revealed to them by Jesus.

The Disciples of Jesus. Their recognition to Jesus is by means of revelation from God the Father (Matthew 16:15-17)
So Jesus revealed the truth to his disciples alone (MARK 4:34)

I believed in Lord Jesus that what he did in New Testament is what he is doing today.

You may ask what you don't understand. Please elaborate it.
Thank you. That is clearer. Let me say that your English is much better than my ability in any language of the Philippines. :)
 
Several things seem wrong in your post. First, regarding forgiveness, Jesus taught the disciples to pray:

“And forgive us our sins, For we also forgive everyone who is indebted to us. And do not lead us into temptation, But deliver us from the evil one.”” (Lu 11:4 NKJV)

So it is wrong to say Saul/Paul should not be forgiven.

Second, he was not elected by Jesus Christ as a replacement of Judas Iscariot. The replacement for Judas was Matthias:

“And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples (altogether the number of names was about a hundred and twenty), and said, “Men and brethren, this Scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit spoke before by the mouth of David concerning Judas, who became a guide to those who arrested Jesus; “for he was numbered with us and obtained a part in this ministry.” (Now this man purchased a field with the wages of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst open in the middle and all his entrails gushed out. And it became known to all those dwelling in Jerusalem; so that field is called in their own language, Akel Dama, that is, Field of Blood.) “For it is written in the book of Psalms: ‘Let his dwelling place be desolate, And let no one live in it’; and, ‘Let another take his office.’ “Therefore, of these men who have accompanied us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, “beginning from the baptism of John to that day when He was taken up from us, one of these must become a witness with us of His resurrection.” And they proposed two: Joseph called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias. And they prayed and said, “You, O Lord, who know the hearts of all, show which of these two You have chosen “to take part in this ministry and apostleship from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.” And they cast their lots, and the lot fell on Matthias. And he was numbered with the eleven apostles.” (Ac 1:15-26 NKJV)

Thirdly, Saul did not become Paul. Unlike Simon being called Peter, or Jacob being called Israel, Saul/Paul didn't have his name changed by God. Saul was his Hebrew name, and Paul was the Roman equivalent.

Thirdly, Saul did not become Paul. Unlike Simon being called Peter, or Jacob being called Israel, Saul/Paul didn't have his name changed by God. Saul was his Hebrew name, and Paul was the Roman equivalent.

This is what I read.
When he was a Pharisee his name is Saul of Tarsus. When he became a chosen of God they called him Paul.
 
In man's standard for good & evil.
Saul of Tarsus is evil. Because he his a murderer of Jesus Christ followers.
For the Disciples of Christ, Saul of Tarsus should not be forgiven.

In God's Standard for good & evil.
But in the eyes of God, Saul of Tarsus can be forgiven.
He was elected by Jesus Christ as a replacement of Judas Iscariot.
And he became Paul.

In this example it is the reverse.
To a Man it is Good. But to God it is Evil and should not be forgiven.

In man's standard for good & evil Sodom & Gomorrah should be forgiven.
So Abraham tried to make an appeal to the Lord because of man standard.
GENESIS 18: 20-23
20 And the Lord said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous;
21 I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know.
22 And the men turned their faces from thence, and went toward Sodom: but Abraham stood yet before the Lord.
23 And Abraham drew near, and said, Wilt thou also destroy the righteous with the wicked?
24 Peradventure there be fifty righteous within the city: wilt thou also destroy and not spare the place for the fifty righteous that are therein?
25 That be far from thee to do after this manner, to slay the righteous with the wicked: and that the righteous should be as the wicked, that be far from thee: Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?
26 And the Lord said, If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes.
27 And Abraham answered and said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, which am but dust and ashes:
28 Peradventure there shall lack five of the fifty righteous: wilt thou destroy all the city for lack of five? And he said, If I find there forty and five, I will not destroy it.
29 And he spake unto him yet again, and said, Peradventure there shall be forty found there. And he said, I will not do it for forty's sake.
30 And he said unto him, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak: Peradventure there shall thirty be found there. And he said, I will not do it, if I find thirty there.
31 And he said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord: Peradventure there shall be twenty found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for twenty's sake.
32 And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for ten's sake.
33 And the Lord went his way, as soon as he had left communing with Abraham: and Abraham returned unto his place.

In God Standard for Good & Evil. Sodom & Gomorrah should not be forgiven.
GENESIS 19:24-25
24 Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven;
25 And he overthrew those cities, and all the plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground.
 
Thirdly, Saul did not become Paul. Unlike Simon being called Peter, or Jacob being called Israel, Saul/Paul didn't have his name changed by God. Saul was his Hebrew name, and Paul was the Roman equivalent.

This is what I read.
When he was a Pharisee his name is Saul of Tarsus. When he became a chosen of God they called him Paul.
Not so. He was still called Saul for a time after He was converted on the Road to Damascus. He is first called Paul in Acts 13, while dealing with Elymas the sorcerer:

“Then Saul, who also is called Paul, filled with the Holy Spirit, looked intently at him” (Ac 13:9 NKJV)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dino246
In this example it is the reverse.
To a Man it is Good. But to God it is Evil and should not be forgiven.

In man's standard for good & evil Sodom & Gomorrah should be forgiven.
So Abraham tried to make an appeal to the Lord because of man standard.
Abraham did not ask for Sodom and Gomorrah to be forgiven. He asked that they be spared destruction. They are not the same thing.

Further, nowhere in Scripture is "man's standard" for forgiveness explained. You're making things up. It's careless to assert that Scripture teaches something which it doesn't teach; claiming that it does demonstrates that you have a low regard for the word of God.
 
Thirdly, Saul did not become Paul. Unlike Simon being called Peter, or Jacob being called Israel, Saul/Paul didn't have his name changed by God. Saul was his Hebrew name, and Paul was the Roman equivalent.

This is what I read.
When he was a Pharisee his name is Saul of Tarsus. When he became a chosen of God they called him Paul.
Btw, you gave me still no answer! You claimed
God is always telling the Truth.
If we just humble ourselves he will answer our questions in his way and not in man's way.
2 CHRONICLES 7:17
14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

Yes, God gave me the answer for the reason why the fruit is forbidden to eat.

You still not gave the answer from what you claimed!
 
Thirdly, Saul did not become Paul. Unlike Simon being called Peter, or Jacob being called Israel, Saul/Paul didn't have his name changed by God. Saul was his Hebrew name, and Paul was the Roman equivalent.

This is what I read.
When he was a Pharisee his name is Saul of Tarsus. When he became a chosen of God they called him Paul.

that's an interesting point that we don't have an equivalent record of God telling him his name was changed - - tho absence of evidence, is not evidence of absence.

i am not convinced Paul is a latin equivalent of Saul - - the latin P is not pronounced like Hebrew S, in fact, Latin has a perfectly good S sound, even tho in Hebrew the S is more of a 'sch' - - - point being inter-language equivalents are typically phonetic approximates with different spellings.

so, tho Paul is latin, meaning small, it may have been a choice by Saul/Paul himself to go by this once he learned that he must take the gospel to the Greeks and the Romans. it is a humble name, and he went with meekness.

Latin in that period didn't have a sch sound - - tho later it was adopted and spelled ti - - perhaps it was simply hard for them to properly say his name, so he adopted Paul?
 
Btw, you gave me still no answer! You claimed


You still not gave the answer from what you claimed!

We are in the process of identifying the Tree #1 & #2.
Without knowing them, we could not understand the reason why God the Father was not allowing Adam & Eve to eat the fruit of Tree #3.

I hope you are following how God the Father identified the Tree #1 & #2.
 
Abraham did not ask for Sodom and Gomorrah to be forgiven. He asked that they be spared destruction. They are not the same thing.

Further, nowhere in Scripture is "man's standard" for forgiveness explained. You're making things up. It's careless to assert that Scripture teaches something which it doesn't teach; claiming that it does demonstrates that you have a low regard for the word of God.

You don't understand that the point here is what is good & evil to God. What is good & evil to man.
God the Father has the Standard for good & evil.
Man has the Standard for good & evil which is opposite to God Standard.
 
In this example it is the reverse.
To a Man it is Good. But to God it is Evil and should not be forgiven.

In man's standard for good & evil Sodom & Gomorrah should be forgiven.
So Abraham tried to make an appeal to the Lord because of man standard.
GENESIS 18: 20-23
20 And the Lord said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous;
21 I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know.
22 And the men turned their faces from thence, and went toward Sodom: but Abraham stood yet before the Lord.
23 And Abraham drew near, and said, Wilt thou also destroy the righteous with the wicked?
24 Peradventure there be fifty righteous within the city: wilt thou also destroy and not spare the place for the fifty righteous that are therein?
25 That be far from thee to do after this manner, to slay the righteous with the wicked: and that the righteous should be as the wicked, that be far from thee: Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?
26 And the Lord said, If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes.
27 And Abraham answered and said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, which am but dust and ashes:
28 Peradventure there shall lack five of the fifty righteous: wilt thou destroy all the city for lack of five? And he said, If I find there forty and five, I will not destroy it.
29 And he spake unto him yet again, and said, Peradventure there shall be forty found there. And he said, I will not do it for forty's sake.
30 And he said unto him, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak: Peradventure there shall thirty be found there. And he said, I will not do it, if I find thirty there.
31 And he said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord: Peradventure there shall be twenty found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for twenty's sake.
32 And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for ten's sake.
33 And the Lord went his way, as soon as he had left communing with Abraham: and Abraham returned unto his place.

In God Standard for Good & Evil. Sodom & Gomorrah should not be forgiven.
GENESIS 19:24-25
24 Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven;
25 And he overthrew those cities, and all the plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground.



I don't know who will understand what God the Father told about Isaac, Jacob & Esau.

In Man's Standard for good & evil what Jacob and Rebekah did is unacceptable (evil) because they deceived Isaac.
It's a long story to read but I will post the verses in case there is anybody who want to read it.
GENESIS 27:1-35
27 When Isaac was old and his eyes were so weak that he could no longer see, he called for Esau his older son and said to him, “My son.”
“Here I am,” he answered.
2 Isaac said, “I am now an old man and don’t know the day of my death. 3 Now then, get your equipment—your quiver and bow—and go out to the open country to hunt some wild game for me. 4 Prepare me the kind of tasty food I like and bring it to me to eat, so that I may give you my blessing before I die.”
5 Now Rebekah was listening as Isaac spoke to his son Esau. When Esau left for the open country to hunt game and bring it back, 6 Rebekah said to her son Jacob, “Look, I overheard your father say to your brother Esau, 7 ‘Bring me some game and prepare me some tasty food to eat, so that I may give you my blessing in the presence of the Lord before I die.’ 8 Now, my son, listen carefully and do what I tell you: 9 Go out to the flock and bring me two choice young goats, so I can prepare some tasty food for your father, just the way he likes it. 10 Then take it to your father to eat, so that he may give you his blessing before he dies.”
11 Jacob said to Rebekah his mother, “But my brother Esau is a hairy man while I have smooth skin. 12 What if my father touches me? I would appear to be tricking him and would bring down a curse on myself rather than a blessing.”
13 His mother said to him, “My son, let the curse fall on me. Just do what I say; go and get them for me.”
14 So he went and got them and brought them to his mother, and she prepared some tasty food, just the way his father liked it. 15 Then Rebekah took the best clothes of Esau her older son, which she had in the house, and put them on her younger son Jacob. 16 She also covered his hands and the smooth part of his neck with the goatskins. 17 Then she handed to her son Jacob the tasty food and the bread she had made.
18 He went to his father and said, “My father.”
“Yes, my son,” he answered. “Who is it?”
19 Jacob said to his father, “I am Esau your firstborn. I have done as you told me. Please sit up and eat some of my game, so that you may give me your blessing.”
20 Isaac asked his son, “How did you find it so quickly, my son?”
“The Lord your God gave me success,” he replied.
21 Then Isaac said to Jacob, “Come near so I can touch you, my son, to know whether you really are my son Esau or not.”
22 Jacob went close to his father Isaac, who touched him and said, “The voice is the voice of Jacob, but the hands are the hands of Esau.” 23 He did not recognize him, for his hands were hairy like those of his brother Esau; so he proceeded to bless him. 24 “Are you really my son Esau?” he asked.
“I am,” he replied.
25 Then he said, “My son, bring me some of your game to eat, so that I may give you my blessing.”
Jacob brought it to him and he ate; and he brought some wine and he drank. 26 Then his father Isaac said to him, “Come here, my son, and kiss me.”
27 So he went to him and kissed him. When Isaac caught the smell of his clothes, he blessed him and said,
“Ah, the smell of my son
is like the smell of a field
that the Lord has blessed.
28 May God give you heaven’s dew
and earth’s richness—
an abundance of grain and new wine.
29 May nations serve you
and peoples bow down to you.
Be lord over your brothers,
and may the sons of your mother bow down to you.
May those who curse you be cursed
and those who bless you be blessed.”
30 After Isaac finished blessing him, and Jacob had scarcely left his father’s presence, his brother Esau came in from hunting. 31 He too prepared some tasty food and brought it to his father. Then he said to him, “My father, please sit up and eat some of my game, so that you may give me your blessing.”
32 His father Isaac asked him, “Who are you?”
“I am your son,” he answered, “your firstborn, Esau.”
33 Isaac trembled violently and said, “Who was it, then, that hunted game and brought it to me? I ate it just before you came and I blessed him—and indeed he will be blessed!”
34 When Esau heard his father’s words, he burst out with a loud and bitter cry and said to his father, “Bless me—me too, my father!”
35 But he said, “Your brother came deceitfully and took your blessing.”

In God's Standard for good & evil it is acceptable (good) because Jacob gained the blessing of his father Isaac. The blessing is irrevocable.
So the birthright has been passed to Jacob.
GENESIS 27:35
35 But he said, “Your brother came deceitfully and took your blessing.”
 
You don't understand that the point here is what is good & evil to God. What is good & evil to man.
God the Father has the Standard for good & evil.
Man has the Standard for good & evil which is opposite to God Standard.
I do understand what God said. That is why I point out the errors in your posts.

Maybe stop claiming Scripture says things that it doesn’t say and you will get less negative feedback from me. You whine about me constantly criticizing you; learn how to interpret Scripture correctly and I won’t need to.

There are times when men have standards in direct opposition to God’s, but not always. Your examples have not made this matter clear because you have forced your ideas into the text.
 
In Man's Standard for good & evil what Jacob and Rebekah did is unacceptable (evil) because they deceived Isaac.

In God's Standard for good & evil it is acceptable (good) because Jacob gained the blessing of his father Isaac. The blessing is irrevocable.
You call good evil and evil good. Consider who else in Scripture does that.
 
I do understand what God said. That is why I point out the errors in your posts.

Maybe stop claiming Scripture says things that it doesn’t say and you will get less negative feedback from me. You whine about me constantly criticizing you; learn how to interpret Scripture correctly and I won’t need to.

There are times when men have standards in direct opposition to God’s, but not always. Your examples have not made this matter clear because you have forced your ideas into the text.

As I said before. It is not me. It is Lord Jesus who exposed you because you failed the test.
With your method (hermeneutical method) so far I know that you will always say negative opinion..

In fact I'm here not to get positive opinion to anybody. I prefer to hear negative opinion as long as they are seeking the truth.
In that case I could share the truth.
But in your case right now, you are not seeking the truth. I'm leaving to Lord Jesus if you still have the chance because Lord Jesus has the foreknowledge.
I know that your understanding in this verse is a literal physical fig tree. Because you don't believe that Lord Jesus Christ is Speaking in Parables (Mark 4:34). Lord Jesus said there is no chance for the fig tree to bear fruit anymore.
MATTHEW 21:18-19
18 Now in the morning as he returned into the city, he hungered.
19 And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away.

I'm just answering your post for the other readers who have the same negative opinion like you but they are seeking the truth like Nicodemus
JOHN 3:3-4
3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
 
I don't know who will understand what God the Father told about Isaac, Jacob & Esau.

In Man's Standard for good & evil what Jacob and Rebekah did is unacceptable (evil) because they deceived Isaac.
It's a long story to read but I will post the verses in case there is anybody who want to read it.
GENESIS 27:1-35
27 When Isaac was old and his eyes were so weak that he could no longer see, he called for Esau his older son and said to him, “My son.”
“Here I am,” he answered.
2 Isaac said, “I am now an old man and don’t know the day of my death. 3 Now then, get your equipment—your quiver and bow—and go out to the open country to hunt some wild game for me. 4 Prepare me the kind of tasty food I like and bring it to me to eat, so that I may give you my blessing before I die.”
5 Now Rebekah was listening as Isaac spoke to his son Esau. When Esau left for the open country to hunt game and bring it back, 6 Rebekah said to her son Jacob, “Look, I overheard your father say to your brother Esau, 7 ‘Bring me some game and prepare me some tasty food to eat, so that I may give you my blessing in the presence of the Lord before I die.’ 8 Now, my son, listen carefully and do what I tell you: 9 Go out to the flock and bring me two choice young goats, so I can prepare some tasty food for your father, just the way he likes it. 10 Then take it to your father to eat, so that he may give you his blessing before he dies.”
11 Jacob said to Rebekah his mother, “But my brother Esau is a hairy man while I have smooth skin. 12 What if my father touches me? I would appear to be tricking him and would bring down a curse on myself rather than a blessing.”
13 His mother said to him, “My son, let the curse fall on me. Just do what I say; go and get them for me.”
14 So he went and got them and brought them to his mother, and she prepared some tasty food, just the way his father liked it. 15 Then Rebekah took the best clothes of Esau her older son, which she had in the house, and put them on her younger son Jacob. 16 She also covered his hands and the smooth part of his neck with the goatskins. 17 Then she handed to her son Jacob the tasty food and the bread she had made.
18 He went to his father and said, “My father.”
“Yes, my son,” he answered. “Who is it?”
19 Jacob said to his father, “I am Esau your firstborn. I have done as you told me. Please sit up and eat some of my game, so that you may give me your blessing.”
20 Isaac asked his son, “How did you find it so quickly, my son?”
“The Lord your God gave me success,” he replied.
21 Then Isaac said to Jacob, “Come near so I can touch you, my son, to know whether you really are my son Esau or not.”
22 Jacob went close to his father Isaac, who touched him and said, “The voice is the voice of Jacob, but the hands are the hands of Esau.” 23 He did not recognize him, for his hands were hairy like those of his brother Esau; so he proceeded to bless him. 24 “Are you really my son Esau?” he asked.
“I am,” he replied.
25 Then he said, “My son, bring me some of your game to eat, so that I may give you my blessing.”
Jacob brought it to him and he ate; and he brought some wine and he drank. 26 Then his father Isaac said to him, “Come here, my son, and kiss me.”
27 So he went to him and kissed him. When Isaac caught the smell of his clothes, he blessed him and said,
“Ah, the smell of my son
is like the smell of a field
that the Lord has blessed.
28 May God give you heaven’s dew
and earth’s richness—
an abundance of grain and new wine.
29 May nations serve you
and peoples bow down to you.
Be lord over your brothers,
and may the sons of your mother bow down to you.
May those who curse you be cursed
and those who bless you be blessed.”
30 After Isaac finished blessing him, and Jacob had scarcely left his father’s presence, his brother Esau came in from hunting. 31 He too prepared some tasty food and brought it to his father. Then he said to him, “My father, please sit up and eat some of my game, so that you may give me your blessing.”
32 His father Isaac asked him, “Who are you?”
“I am your son,” he answered, “your firstborn, Esau.”
33 Isaac trembled violently and said, “Who was it, then, that hunted game and brought it to me? I ate it just before you came and I blessed him—and indeed he will be blessed!”
34 When Esau heard his father’s words, he burst out with a loud and bitter cry and said to his father, “Bless me—me too, my father!”
35 But he said, “Your brother came deceitfully and took your blessing.”

In God's Standard for good & evil it is acceptable (good) because Jacob gained the blessing of his father Isaac. The blessing is irrevocable.
So the birthright has been passed to Jacob.
GENESIS 27:35
35 But he said, “Your brother came deceitfully and took your blessing.”

I just want to remind that our point here is that God & Man have the different standard for good & evil.

With our previous examples as a demonstrations by Lord Jesus.
What is good for God is evil to man.
And what is evil to God is good to man.

Another example is the malefactor at the right hand of Lord Jesus when they crucified.
At first the two thieves ridicules Jesus.
MATTHEW 27:40-44
40 And saying, Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days, save thyself. If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross.
41 Likewise also the chief priests mocking him, with the scribes and elders, said,
42 He saved others; himself he cannot save. If he be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.
43 He trusted in God; let him deliver him now, if he will have him: for he said, I am the Son of God.
44 The thieves also, which were crucified with him, cast the same in his teeth.

The malefactor at the right hand of Lord Jesus was inveterate thief.
So in man's standard for good & evil he is evil.


But in God's standard for good & evil he is good and he saved by Jesus.
LUKE 23:42-43
42 And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom.
43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt thou be with me in paradise.

I'm not saying that being a thief is good. That is horrible.
What we are pointing out is the good & evil between God's standard and man's standard.
 
I'm not saying that being a thief is good. That is horrible.
What we are pointing out is the good & evil between God's standard and man's standard.
You aren’t a “we”; you are an “I”.

God didn’t interfere with the execution of the thief; he died for his crimes. He didn’t say that man’s standard was wrong. You keep using weak examples to bolster an argument that doesn’t need to be made.
 
You aren’t a “we”; you are an “I”.

God didn’t interfere with the execution of the thief; he died for his crimes. He didn’t say that man’s standard was wrong. . You keep using weak examples to bolster an argument that doesn’t need to be made.


He didn’t say that man’s standard was wrong.
No wonder why you can't understand what God the Father said in this verse. It is only God the Father who is giving the understanding. Without knowing who God the Father is, you will not receive understanding from him (Proverbs 2:6)
ISAIAH 55:8
8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord.

How far the understanding of God to the understanding of man?
The distance is heaven & earth.
ISAIAH 55:9
9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.
 
I do understand what God said. That is why I point out the errors in your posts.

Maybe stop claiming Scripture says things that it doesn’t say and you will get less negative feedback from me. You whine about me constantly criticizing you; learn how to interpret Scripture correctly and I won’t need to.

There are times when men have standards in direct opposition to God’s, but not always. Your examples have not made this matter clear because you have forced your ideas into the text.


you will get less negative feedback from me
I'm leaving it to Lord Jesus.
If he allows your negative feedback in every truth I share then so be it. You can make negative feedback as many as you can.

Remember the TARES in this Parable?
At first, the owner allow the tares to grow with the wheat.
But on the harvest day they burn them.
MATTHEW 13:27-30
27 So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?
28 He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
29 But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

Remember Cain? At first he was protected by God the Father. But at the last day Cain will be condemned.
GENESIS 4:15
15 And the Lord said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the Lord set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.

God said, there is a time for everything.