No. I'm finishing the argument to its logical conclusion. If the logic wasn't working, crickets wouldn't have been the result.Are you shifting because your logic isn't working?
No. I'm finishing the argument to its logical conclusion. If the logic wasn't working, crickets wouldn't have been the result.Are you shifting because your logic isn't working?
Where is that recorded in the passage?When they are standing before the man thier actions that day do convicted them.
Where is that recorded in the passage?
I believe God has included everything he needs to include, which includes nothing being hidden from us.You'll have to ask the Author ... who (or what) God has included in Scripture is who (or what) God has included in Scripture.
can you at least agree that who/what God has included in Scripture is who/what God wanted to include in Scripture?
yes it is the Lord's righteousness that is imputed to those who believe.
God clothes the born again one with the garments of salvation and covers the born again one with the robe of righteousness:
Isaiah 61:10 I will greatly rejoice in the LORD, my soul shall be joyful in my God; for he hath clothed me with the garments of salvation, he hath covered me with the robe of righteousness, as a bridegroom decketh himself with ornaments, and as a bride adorneth herself with her jewels.
.
No. I'm finishing the argument to its logical conclusion. If the logic wasn't working, crickets wouldn't have been the result.
Getting back to actual reality (and departing from @Cameron143 'sIf the power was inherent, it would necessarily be experienced by all. The truth is that when God's word goes forth, it always accomplishes what it is sent forth to accomplish. This being the case, when someone is saved as a result of sending forth the word, this was God's purpose. When it doesn't, God's purpose couldn't have been salvation.
So in the first case, the power of God was indeed exercised because the outcome is belief. In the second case, are you suggesting God exercised His power so the individual wouldn't believe?
Around here, most times not answering @Cameron143 "questions" (if you want to call them that, as this appellation is in his case mostly faulty) is by far the best use of your time. Same goes for several other posters.Sometimes not awnsering a question is the smartest approach to the argument lol
One of those people that day in Acts 7 listening to Stephen preach the Gospel and watch him be stoned to death ended up writing 2\3 of the New Testament. We know him as Paul but that day he was called Saul. So ultimately at least ONE PERSON if not several others were later on convicted and saved.You do have the ability to apply discernment from scripture. You do it i do it. You have a differnt doctrine then me and vise versa. If no one ever applied thier own thinking to what scripture did or didnt mean there would be no differnt denominations. I mean heck the 10k post here and the 10k before it and the 10k before it are proof that is not the case. We all get slightly differnt meanings when we read and think about what is written. But you think and reason about scripture and then come up with ideas and opinions that are not directly stated in the passage just as I do. Its not a bad thing unless it's bat crap looney and you are trying to teach it haha.
Its not a bad thing unless it's bat crap looney and you are trying to teach it haha.You do have the ability to apply discernment from scripture. You do it i do it. You have a differnt doctrine then me and vise versa. If no one ever applied thier own thinking to what scripture did or didnt mean there would be no differnt denominations. I mean heck the 10k post here and the 10k before it and the 10k before it are proof that is not the case. We all get slightly differnt meanings when we read and think about what is written. But you think and reason about scripture and then come up with ideas and opinions that are not directly stated in the passage just as I do. Its not a bad thing unless it's bat crap looney and you are trying to teach it haha.
Around here, most times not answering @Cameron143 "questions" (if you want to call them that, as this appellation is in his case mostly faulty) is by far the best use of your time. Same goes for several other posters.
Why bother sowing seed on hard ground? Every kernel will be devoured by the birds as you well know.
No one has said man doesn't have volition; only that it isn't free. One is either a slave to sin or righteousness, and one's nature inevitably impacts one's choices. How then is the will free?Getting back to actual reality (and departing from @Cameron143 'sendless
hypothetical fantasies), we recognize that @studier is correct in stating that indeed, God's power to save is inherent in the gospel, needing no other preconditions.
But, what @Cameron143 fails to address (in order that he might become rooted in actual reality) is the following (not to mention vast swaths of other Biblical precepts as well):
That God bequeaths men with objective free will, whereby and wherewith God may be justified in the end.
In other words, the volition of man cannot be removed from the justification equation.
[Act 6:10 KJV]
And they were not able to resist the wisdom and the spirit by which he spake.
[Act 6:11 KJV]
Then they suborned men, which said, We have heard him speak blasphemous words against Moses, and [against] God.
[Act 7:51 KJV]
Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers [did], so [do] ye.
[Rom 13:2 KJV]
Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
[2Ti 3:8 KJV]
Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith.
***************************************************************************************************
[Psa 51:4 KJV]
Against thee, thee only, have I sinned, and done [this] evil in thy sight: that thou mightest be justified when thou speakest, [and] be clear when thou judgest.
[Isa 43:9 KJV]
Let all the nations be gathered together, and let the people be assembled: who among them can declare this, and shew us former things? let them bring forth their witnesses, that they may be justified: or let them hear, and say, [It is] truth.
[Luk 7:29 KJV]
And all the people that heard [him], and the publicans, justified God, being baptized with the baptism of John.
[Luk 18:14 KJV]
I tell you, this man went down to his house justified [rather] than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.
[Rom 3:4 KJV]
God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.
[Rom 3:24 KJV]
Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
[1Co 4:4 KJV]
For I know nothing by myself; yet am I not hereby justified: but he that judgeth me is the Lord.
[Gal 2:17 KJV]
But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, [is] therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid.
There are a ton of warnings about this both OT and NT.Yes, agree not a good use of time at all.
Hard ground >>> the result of suppressing the truth.
They (the FWer) calls being taken captive to do the will of the devil, "free will." They have the man who isNo one has said man doesn't have volition; only that it isn't free. One is either a slave to sin or righteousness, and one's nature inevitably impacts one's choices. How then is the will free?
If your arguments could stand alone you wouldn't feel the need to impugn my character. I wonder what is impacting your choice to do so.
More of your dishonesty. Does it ever end? Christ makes us alive while we are dead. You FWers deny thisSo effectively ion this Reformed system, you get life apart from Christ,
The inherent power of the gospel breaks the power of Satan in all cases.They (the FWer) calls being taken captive to do the will of the devil, "free will." They have the man who is
blinded by the god of this age, seeing before he can receive or comprehend the things to which he is
inherently opposed as a God-hater, and deciding to come into the light when Scripture says he refuses.
You also changed the meaning by employing the word toward instead of unto. Unto has the connotation of fulfillment, which maintains the actual meaning of the verse. The power of God is exercised and the result is belief.
No. I'm finishing the argument to its logical conclusion. If the logic wasn't working, crickets wouldn't have been the result.
Supposed "crickets" are the result of you "answering questions" that you, and you alone have the answers to.No. I'm finishing the argument to its logical conclusion. If the logic wasn't working, crickets wouldn't have been the result.