I follow my desires. Before I was born again, my desires were for myself. After being born again, my desire was for God.What do you think you use to make those choices?
I follow my desires. Before I was born again, my desires were for myself. After being born again, my desire was for God.What do you think you use to make those choices?
Reads like salvation can be lost to me?![]()
I follow my desires. Before I was born again, my desires were for myself. After being born again, my desire was for God.
No not really.Posting a bunch of verses without you saying what you think they mean does nothing. None of these verses negates what I said.
Reads like salvation can be lost to me?![]()
You are manipulating the whole meaning of the parable in your desperate attempt to force Scripture to state something never intended by the Author.
A lawyer who wanted to justify himself asked Jesus "who is my neighbor". Jesus then told the parable of the good Samaritan and asked the lawyer "Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves? " (Luke 10:36).
The lawyer answered "He that shewed mercy on him." (Luke 10:37).
Jesus answered "Go, and do thou likewise." (Luke 10:37).
Jesus did not correct the lawyer ... the lawyer answered correctly.
The parable is not a parable to use in explaining how a person believes unto salvation ... there is no mention of the gospel having been preached to the half dead man ... also, under your system, isn't natural man considered to be "dead" ... not just "half dead" as the injured man in the parable?
Why do you attribute sin to the injured man when it is wholly obvious from the parable that the perpetrators of sin were the "thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead." (Luke 10:30).
God's punishment for the sin inflicted on the half dead man is not explained in the parable ... because that is not the intent of the parable ... get a clue, man.
What is "evil, wicked, unjust, unfair, unrighteous" is you comparing God to the priest and the levite, both of whom looked upon the fallen man, and crossed the other side (Luke 10:31-32).
.
I follow my desires. Before I was born again, my desires were for myself. After being born again, my desire was for God.
Our salvation from death cannot be lost. If God has made you alive and given you to Christ (which, He does if you believe), then He will not undo it and nothing in all creation can undo it, including oneself. Rom.8:31:39 God is not mocked, He does not give His Son gifts that do not believe in Him. Keep in mind, it was sin that caused death in the first place and now Christ has dealt with sin, that is no longer the issue. The issue now is our response to Christ, He is the Word. How one handles the word of God after salvation from death will be evaluated at the judgement seat of Christ.
What can be lost are rewards in both time and eternity. The rewards of time is the contentment that comes from learning how to face all things through Christ. Phil.4:11 What Christ described as the abundant life. Jn.10:10 Most Christians today fall apart when things go wrong. They struggle with fear, guilt, all forms of anxiety, all of which are anti-faith.
You are being guided and set up to become what appears to be an expert for those already thinking in apostasy.
There is a 'market' for your dogma.
But, the wages of sin are going to be death.
Nice shiny ring you got there!
Reads like salvation can be lost to me?![]()
You have either entirely removed grace from being the cause and reason for salvation or your communication skills are so lacking that no one can understand what you are saying..Am I really that hard to understand? I thought I explained it fairly well.
God foreknowing people is Him seeing Himself in a relationship with believers. He is knowing them as opposed to not knowing them Matt.7:23 It is relational knowing like "I know my spouse". Omniscience and foreknowledge are two different "branches" of God's knowing. God knows who are believers and who are unbelievers from His omniscience. Election etc is predicated on His foreknowledge ergo, only believers are elected etc. Election is God choosing what to do with believers, it is not Him determining who will be a believer.
You have either entirely removed grace from being the cause and reason for salvation or your communication skills are so lacking that no one can understand what you are saying..
The fact that I believed was a result of regeneration and the Spirit working in me....The reason for saving you is your choice to believe.
Sound doctrine is demanded of God to be able to grant us that kind of happiness that not all will find while on earth.
the fact that the road was not safe to travel does not mean that going to Jericho was sinful in and of itself. In fact, Jesus travelled to Jericho and healed two blind men sitting at the side of the road as He was leaving and they followed Him (Matt 20:29-34); blind Bartimaeus received sight and followed Him (Mark 10:46-52; Luke 18:35-43); salvation came to the house of Zacchaeus in Jericho (Luke 19:1-10).Actually, the man was in fact on the "wrong path" going the "wrong way" so to speak.
[Luk 10:30 NKJV]
Then Jesus answered and said: "A certain [man] went DOWN from Jerusalem ***to*** Jericho, and fell among thieves, who stripped him of his clothing, wounded [him], and departed, leaving [him] half dead.
yes, the priest and the levite were not "good neighbors" under the parable Jesus gave in answer to the question "who is my neighbor".cv5 said:The man, who was on the "road to ruin" SHOULD have been ministered to by the priest and the Levite so that he would LEARN God's way and repent of his foolish gambit. That was their mandate. But they failed to do their duty.
were pharisees present? ... the verses just before the discussion with the lawyer indicate Jesus was with His disciples when the 70 returned. The lawyer stood up and asked the question (Luke 10:25).cv5 said:That is the ONE of the main points of the parable. Jesus is upbraiding the pharisees and lawyers for their hardness of heart to sinners and gentiles.
there is no indication the beaten man came to salvation because that is not the point of the parable ... however, it appears you are in agreement with Rufus in your understanding of the parable ...cv5 said:The other main point? That it is JESUS Who is the "GOOD" Samaritan. He is willing and able to succor and help the sinner, any sinner.
You have either entirely removed grace from being the cause and reason for salvation or your communication skills are so lacking that no one can understand what you are saying..
The fact that I believed was a result of regeneration and the Spirit working in me....
here is what you said, Rufus:I can explain it to ya, but it's above my pay grade to make you understand it. You can't even understand my post! I never attributed sin to crime victim. Learn to read! Take night courses.
Likewise, man comes into this world spiritually dead due to our Federal Head Adam. God did not make/force/coerce or compel Adam to sin.
again ... not the point of the parable, Rufus. Read the verses again:Rufus said:The parallel between God and the Good Samaritan is there for those whose eyes God has not blinded!
the half dead man wasn't "sinned against" ???Rufus said:And you parade more of your ignorance shamelessly with what I bolded in red. Logic certainly is not your strong suit, is it!? Where your stupid analogy fails is that the priest and Levite were not sinned against -- whereas God was!
here is what you said, Rufus:Rufus said:Therefore, God has no moral duty to save anyone! My post didn't even remotely imply what you wrote.
the nonsense you wrote.
God's holy, righteous, good nature requires Him to punish sin; for justice and righteousness are the foundation to God's throne (Ps 97:2), , so if God chooses to leave people in their fallen, dead state and punish rather than forgive how does this make God evil, wicked, unjust, unfair, unrighteous, etc.?
First ... Rufus ... you really need to learn to control your emotional outbursts. Discussion in an online forum through typed text is not as clear as sitting face to face having discussion. So knock off the sniping rants and state your point ... quit going off track due to your inability to keep your emotions in check..
So you believe everyone knows about Jesus?I will ask....
2000 years ago? Before the Great Commission went into the world?
Did cultures outside of Israel know anything about Jesus dying on a Cross?
No, it was unknown everywhere else in the world except Israel.
That ignorance was what the Great Commission was to put an end to.
Now that we have become partakers of what the Great Commission succeeded in establishing?
Today we have this!
![]()