Loss of salvation???

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,006
666
113
Or is the salvation of your souls the process of becoming more Christlike as out mind is renewed and the body is brought into submission to the renewing mind enlightened by the Soirit.? Maybe this is the salvation we are in the process of receiving as we patiently bear suffering for His sake.
My question would be whether this is different than eternal salvation and associated eternal security or part of it. IOW, is salvation of souls optional because I think that's what some are saying it is.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,006
666
113
And generally, the sects that have the most unbiblical theories write the most voluminously, because they have a lot of work to do post hoc rationalising how the scriptures need to be complexly interpreted to fit their theories into them.
If AI were to remain objective it would have to identify that there are voluminous writings both for and against God and Scripture. At the moment it looks to me that how the query is structured will determine what volume is mainly drawn from. So, I asked Copilot the simple question: "does God exist"? Here's the answer:

The existence of God is one of the most debated questions in philosophy, science, and theology. There are arguments both for and against the idea.​
Some arguments for God's existence include:​
  • The Cosmological Argument: Everything that exists must have a cause, and the universe itself must have been caused by something—often argued to be God.
  • The Fine-Tuning Argument: The universe appears to be precisely calibrated for life, suggesting an intelligent designer.
  • The Moral Argument: The existence of objective moral values implies a higher moral authority.
On the other hand, arguments against God's existence include:​
  • The Problem of Evil: If an all-powerful, all-loving God exists, why does suffering and evil persist in the world?
  • Scientific Explanations: Many natural phenomena once attributed to divine intervention now have scientific explanations.
  • Philosophical Skepticism: Some philosophers argue that belief in God is based on faith rather than evidence.
Ultimately, belief in God is a deeply personal matter, shaped by faith, experience, and reasoning. What are your thoughts on the subject?​
Not very helpful IMO.

If we took all that computing power and developed a directive to deal with all of the combinations of translation issues to ultimately harmonize them into a completely reasoned completion, then we might have something.
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,557
331
83
THIS IS ONE SALVATION THAT A BELIEVER CAN LOSE..... AND MANY DO LOSE.


1 Peter 1:6-9

In all this you greatly rejoice, though now for a little while you may have had to suffer grief
in all kinds of trials. These have come so that the proven genuineness of your faith—of greater
worth than gold, which perishes even though refined by fire—may result in praise, glory and
honor when Jesus Christ is revealed. Though you have not seen him, you love him; and even
though you do not see him now, you believe in him and are filled with an inexpressible and
glorious joy, for you are receiving the goal of your faith, the salvation of your souls.



The only way they can secure this salvation?
2 Peter 3:18 - is to be continuously growing in grace and knowledge of sound doctrine.


Jesus warned....... few find it.
The problem with applying that to us today is that Peter wasn't the apostle to the Gentiles. Loss of salvation isn't possible under the Gospel of Grace that was revealed to the Gentile world through Paul. Any expenditure of effort on our part nullifies God's grace for salvation, therefore even discussing loss of salvation is nothing more than fear-mongering and doubt. We should not at all be entertaining this notion at all since it isn't at all a possibility.

MM
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
4,521
778
113
Thanks, I read it. I wanted you to explain what you think it means, which you've now done.

No comment for now on agreement or disagreement of its meaning or extent of its meaning.

Thanks again.
Does that mean you need more time to find a way to contradict what I said? :)
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
4,574
624
113
My question would be whether this is different than eternal salvation and associated eternal security or part of it. IOW, is salvation of souls optional because I think that's what some are saying it is.
I would question whether a being who is immortal even needs to be concerned about what will be the case in the future. The primary concern of such a being IMO would be, "What is the case right now?" If I am not saved, or being saved, in the present, of what value is it to believe I will one day be saved in the future?

I believe God wants us to focus on the experience of being saved in practice now, rather than theories about being saved technically in the future. I think theories about being lost or saved in the future are red herrings that distract us from the important matter of being saved right now.
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
4,521
778
113
The problem with applying that to us today is that Peter wasn't the apostle to the Gentiles. Loss of salvation isn't possible under the Gospel of Grace that was revealed to the Gentile world through Paul. Any expenditure of effort on our part nullifies God's grace for salvation, therefore even discussing loss of salvation is nothing more than fear-mongering and doubt. We should not at all be entertaining this notion at all since it isn't at all a possibility.

MM
Not a loss of THE salvation.
For we who believed in Christ will all be in heaven.

But a loss of a great benefit that is available to all who are regenerated.
Called... Salvation of the soul.
It requires passing tests that will be there to try to stop us from reaching full maturity in Christ.

The salvation of the soul that Peter tells us about pertains to a unique state of peace that God gives
a believer who remains faithful to keep taking in the needed sound doctrine and walk in the Spirit
as the means to overcoming what comes against God's desired way for us to be living.
Becoming an "overcomer" inwardly towards the evils that come our way.

It is not complex.

Here again...


1 Peter 1:6-9

In all this you greatly rejoice, though now for a little while you may have had to suffer grief
in all kinds of trials. These have come so that the proven genuineness of your faith—of greater
worth than gold, which perishes even though refined by fire—may result in praise, glory and
honor when Jesus Christ is revealed. Though you have not seen him, you love him; and even
though you do not see him now, you believe in him and are filled with an inexpressible and
glorious joy, for you are receiving the goal of your faith, the salvation of your souls. .
Faith is what we choose to believe. Tests must come to try to rattle our faith to see if our faith in fact is genuine.
(not false doctrinal thinking).

Those who fight with truth for more truth and find it, will gain a great peace within them as they live out their time on earth.


Though you have not seen him, you love him; and even though you do not see him now,
you believe in him and are filled with an inexpressible and glorious joy, for you are receiving
the goal of your faith, the salvation of your souls. .

.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,006
666
113
Does that mean you need more time to find a way to contradict what I said? :)
It just means I don't want to debate the meaning right now. As usual it doesn't mean the same thing to everybody.

It looks like you have a couple others who are responding to it.
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
4,521
778
113
It just means I don't want to debate the meaning right now. As usual it doesn't mean the same thing to everybody.

It looks like you have a couple others who are responding to it.

Does anything ever reach your core and satisfy?
 
Oct 19, 2024
4,718
1,041
113
USA-TX
I didn't. Quote from the post where you allege I did.
"There is no unforgivable blasphemy. There is a blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, a sin unto death, which is not pre-emptively covered by the cross and which will not be forgiven while it is being practised." [#2,154]
 

Jimbone

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2014
3,280
1,150
113
45
Right. That agony was the beginning of the wrath of God being poured out upon Him in my understanding.
With all due respect, I don't think so. I think this was just the anticipation of facing Gods wrath. This was Jesus getting ready, Jesus wasn't forsaken until He was on the cross. He was praying in the garden, not cut off. He couldn't be "under wrath" and still connected to and speaking with the Father. The garden was just Him coming to terms with exactly what was about to happen, and I don't believe it was the physical part He feared at all either, not at all. He knew the price He was going to pay way before He laid His life down. I don't want to act like I disagree with your understanding here; it wasn't a picnic here either, but I can't agree He was under Gods wrath when He was in direct communication with Him still.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
21,990
7,562
113
63
With all due respect, I don't think so. I think this was just the anticipation of facing Gods wrath. This was Jesus getting ready, Jesus wasn't forsaken until He was on the cross. He was praying in the garden, not cut off. He couldn't be "under wrath" and still connected to and speaking with the Father. The garden was just Him coming to terms with exactly what was about to happen, and I don't believe it was the physical part He feared at all either, not at all. He knew the price He was going to pay way before He laid His life down. I don't want to act like I disagree with your understanding here; it wasn't a picnic here either, but I can't agree He was under Gods wrath when He was in direct communication with Him still.
If you keep reading, I did some research and adjusted my understanding. But thanks for sharing.