PaulThomson said:
Those who are setting their minds on their flesh are "in the flesh". They may be either unregenerate or regenerate.
1Cor.3:1 And I,
brethren, could not speak unto
you as unto spiritual, but
as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.
2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.
3
For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions,
are ye not carnal, and walk as men?
4 For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; a
re ye not carnal?
Those who are setting their mind on their spirit and are cooperating with the Holy Spirit in them are "not in the flesh" but are "in the spirit".
9
But ye are not in the flesh, but
in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God is dwelling in you
You are conflating terms. "If the Spirit is
dwelling in you, you
are not in the flesh", does not infer that if the Spirit is not
dwelling in you, you
must be in the flesh. To claim so would be the negative inference fallacy.
For example, "If you
are dwelling in a palace, you
are not in a slum", does not infer that "if you are not dwelling in a palace, you must be in a slum". The carnal Christians
had the Holy Spirit, otherwise they would not belong to Christ; but He was not
dwelling in them while they were behaving in a carnal way and being carnal, in the flesh. So clearly there is a difference between a person "
having the Holy Spirit" but yet "
being in the flesh", and the "Holy Spirit
dwelling in a person", and that person therefore
being in the Spirit.
You are, for some inexplicable reason, equating someone being unregenerate with them being unable to use their unregenerate spirit to hear and to desire to please God. You seem to be factoring in that biblically unfounded presupposition into texts that do not say anything like that.