I find it difficult to have a discussion with you because from my vantage point you deflect from actually answering my questions. You broaden the discussion, and when I ask about something you add, you continue the same pattern.
My questions weren't rhetorical. I would like to know what commandment you have kept in your own endeavor. I would like to know when you have actually loved God with all your mind, heart, and strength. I would like to know what you believe the commandment requires of an individual for it to be completely and perfectly kept.
If man is collaborating with God in salvation, salvation is not then of grace.
Salvation is always by grace through faith. Every part of it. But this does not preclude Christian collaboration with God. It explains how the Christian can collaborate with God.
Faith is essentially if not actually never separate from obedience though faith and obedience can be separate from work. If I unknowingly or knowingly obey a command of God to believe what God tells me, then what work have I done? What wages does He owe me?
He is called to respond to this grace and does with obedience. But not until has drawn him, made known what Christ has done for him, and the Spirit circumcises his heart. Before such time, man is at enmity with God and a slave to sin.
You're putting forth the traditional come to faith then obey God concept. It's not wrong IMO but it's only partially correct.
I'm going to respond to narrative with narrative until if and when you'd care to look at or put forth Scripture and just one or two at a time and not in the typical proof-texting way.
I see Paul and Hebrews at minimum making the case that faith is so vitally connected to obedience that it's used interchangeably.
I see God commanding men to believe in His Son Jesus Christ. So believing in Jesus Christ is [known or unknown] obedience to God.
In this light, I see in the Text that unbelieving men are not only to believe the Gospel but to obey the Gospel.
All of this is simply how the Text speaks. It doesn't accommodate our one level thinking but requires us to think more dimensionally and comparatively.
God's drawing is explained in context in John 6 as His teaching unbelieving men about His Son. And all Jesus says after referencing OC Scripture is that men who hear and learn from the Father will come to Him which in context is to believe in Him.
I see the enmity Paul speaks of as being specifically that of man under sin not being able to obey God's Law. This is not the God-Hating wanting to know nothing about God concept I'm reading in this thread. Nor is this saying unbelieving man has no ability nor desire to know about God who he has heard of or who He has understood from God's Creation and God making His existence clear to all men.
Any part of this or anything else you'd like to look at in Scripture, I may be agreeable to do. I have no idea how anyone here thinks they're making any case whatsoever apart from looking intently at Scripture together.