Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
And for good reason. The justified are viewed as righteous as Christ is. Yet, this still doesn't change the fact that Christians still sin. Christians don't practically attain to perfection until the resurrection.
I seldom answer folks who cannot be bothered to post what the actual verse(s) are saying...you will note in my posts that it would be very rare for me to not post the verse(s) rather than just the reference
Further, I also entail why the verses are in the post.....I address meaning etc
Maybe you should be courteous and do the same. There is a certain arrogance in the way you responded to me. Who taught you to address people that way and believers in particular?
As it is, I cannot understand, not because I am ignorant of the scripture you posted, why you would think there is any bearing on what I posted? If anyone here has posted about our guilt and Jesus taking our place, that person would be me....although I am certainly not alone.
Many things come into view as any particular topic is being discussed, but at the time that I responded, what was said of Jacob and Esau before they were born had been brought up, and that is what I addressed. In fact, Jacob and Esau are often brought up while election is being discussed, so I'm not sure exactly what your objection is, or why you are objecting at all.
Many things come into view as any particular topic is being discussed, but at the time that I responded, what was said of Jacob and Esau before they were born had been brought up, and that is what I addressed. In fact, Jacob and Esau are often brought up while election is being discussed, so I'm not sure exactly what your objection is, or why you are objecting at all.
I believe @FollowerofShiloh didn't realize that God espoused his love and hatred before birth. He gave a reason that God hated Esau because Esau despised his birthright. I pointed out that God said He hated him before he was born.
From there it devolved into a discussion of whether Paul's writing was merely his opinion or the word of God.
I believe @FollowerofShiloh didn't realize that God espoused his love and hatred before birth. He gave a reason that God hated Esau because Esau despised his birthright. I pointed out that God said He hated him before he was born.
From there it devolved into a discussion of whether Paul's writing was merely his opinion or the word of God.
Actually, I pointed out what Esau did. And I also pointed out that Malachi never said what Paul did. And I pointed out that Paul said it based upon his explanation of Election.
Since Paul is the only one who mentioned before birth, which the Prophets never did, I suggested that Paul is using it for his reasoning in the explanation of Election. Since it does not align with what the Prophets said about Jacob/Esau, I suggested that was Paul's opinion.
I believe @FollowerofShiloh didn't realize that God espoused his love and hatred before birth. He gave a reason that God hated Esau because Esau despised his birthright. I pointed out that God said He hated him before he was born.
From there it devolved into a discussion of whether Paul's writing was merely his opinion or the word of God.
So I am aware... none of that changes the fact that the twins were identified as two different nations. One of those nations is representative of God's chosen people; the other nation is God's enemies.
Romans 5:8
But God proves His love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.
Romans 5:10
For if, when we were enemies of God, we were reconciled to Him through the death of
His Son, how much more, having been reconciled, shall we be saved through His life!
Hebrews 2:17
For this reason He had to be made like His brothers in every way, so that He might become a merciful and faithful high priest in service to God, in order to make atonement for the sins of the people.
And who are the "us" in Rom 5:8? If you say the elect, then in eternity God viewed "us" as being in Christ, and since in Christ then were as justified by divine decree. Of course, in time and space, God sent his Son to die for ungodly sinners who are his enemies because that is how we enter into this world being in Adam. It was in time and space at the Cross of Christ that God actually demonstrated his eternal love for his chosen ones. In other words, God in Christ, walked [in temporal reality] his [eternal] talk.
So I am aware... none of that changes the fact that the twins were identified as two different nations. One of those nations is representative of God's chosen people; the other nation is God's enemies.
Because what he said about Jacob/Esau "does not align" with what God instructed the Prophets to say about the matter.
And Scripture must "ALWAYS FLOW" in harmony.
I seldom answer folks who cannot be bothered to post what the actual verse(s) are saying...you will note in my posts that it would be very rare for me to not post the verse(s) rather than just the reference
Further, I also entail why the verses are in the post.....I address meaning etc
Maybe you should be courteous and do the same. There is a certain arrogance in the way you responded to me. Who taught you to address people that way and believers in particular?
As it is, I cannot understand, not because I am ignorant of the scripture you posted, why you would think there is any bearing on what I posted? If anyone here has posted about our guilt and Jesus taking our place, that person would be me....although I am certainly not alone.
And if you can't be bothered to get your bible and look up the passages, should I feel guilty for what you choose to not do?
And you should be the last one here to talk about someone else's arrogance or discourteousness (real or perceived!). Remove the beam from your own eye before pointing to any speck in mine.
Because what he said about Jacob/Esau "does not align" with what God instructed the Prophets to say about the matter.
And Scripture must "ALWAYS FLOW" in harmony.
And it does! The prophets did not talk about Jacob and Esau in the CONTEXT in election. They spoke of the twins from a horizontal/eartly perspective; whereas Paul spoke of them from a vertical/eternal perspective.
And it does! The prophets did not talk about Jacob and Esau in the CONTEXT in election. They spoke of the twins from a horizontal/eartly perspective; whereas Paul spoke of them from a vertical/eternal perspective.
Actually, I pointed out what Esau did. And I also pointed out that Malachi never said what Paul did. And I pointed out that Paul said it based upon his explanation of Election.
Since Paul is the only one who mentioned before birth, which the Prophets never did, I suggested that Paul is using it for his reasoning in the explanation of Election. Since it does not align with what the Prophets said about Jacob/Esau, I suggested that was Paul's opinion.
And I replied by saying that this logic is flawed for 2 reasons:
1. God gives fuller understanding over time throughout history. So one should expect later writings in scripture to inform earlier writings.
2. All scripture is given by inspiration of God. Whether or not a writer believed he was giving his own opinion, the fact that it is in scripture means it is the word of God and is as authoritative as if Jesus Himself had said it.
The elect are never referred to as sinners but as saints. They were saints in eternity and sinners in time. But it was in eternity that God loved his elect. He didn't just decided to love them in space and time when they were still sinners. Furthermore, your understanding of the passage would contradict more than a few passages that speak of God's hate toward sinners.