What does that have to do with anything?i submit that the epistle to the Romans was written by Paul, not Peter.
so, that's 433 verses.
What does that have to do with anything?i submit that the epistle to the Romans was written by Paul, not Peter.
so, that's 433 verses.
More baseless opinions from you.LOL. More contradictions from you.
I just went back to around page 30 and found plenty of proof that you are a liar.That's just your opinion, and you provided no evidence to support it. Wrong as usual. All opinions and never any proof.
You have NO IDEA what you're talking about. Go back and re-read. I made it clear that some people call themselves atheist, but still have a tiny bit of faith.I just went back to around page 30 and found plenty of proof that you are a liar.
Telling us atheists believe in God and hope He is good and will save them. How laughable!
Yes, you said you believed young but called yourself an atheist most of your life which made you a liar.You have NO IDEA what you're talking about. Go back and re-read. I made it clear that some people call themselves atheist, but still have a tiny bit of faith.
And nice try derailing from the argument to make your opinions look more valid. Good day!
i submit that the epistle to the Romans was written by Paul, not Peter.
so, that's 433 verses.
Yes, people lie to themselves, just like you're lying to yourself when you think you're not an ungodly rebel.Yes, you said you believed young but called yourself an atheist most of your life which made you a liar.
That is proof for my claim which you said I had none for, so it is not a derail, just another lie from you.
When did I say I think I'm not an ungodly rebel? More assumptions and lies from you.Yes, people lie to themselves, just like you're lying to yourself when you think you're not an ungodly rebel.
i submit further that Ignatius wrote to the church in Rome in the first century and mentioned no bishop, and he, being from Antioch, spoke to them with authority, not in obeaience to them
The premeninence of the Roman church is a myth. the first person called pope was from. Alexandria in the 4th century. Roman bishops created the idea of being in charge of all. of the churches in the Roman empire completely out of their imagination a few hundred years after the Roman empire itself.oved.to Constantinople. it is a purely cultural and political machination born in the socual vacuum created by the empire moving its seat east towards its center.
Augistine Himself argues that the keys of the kingdom belong to everyone that confesses Christ is LORD, not to Peter peculiarly.
Well...that's your story and you're sticking to it.More work never means more authority, that's ridiculous. Paul did rebuke Peter, and Peter was humble, not like the current pope, who thinks he is infallible. I never claimed Peter was infallible either, so no Paul did not overstep.
In Mathew 28 all disciples had authority to go out and make other disciples, but Peter was still chief, as evident in the verse I provided. Peter was generally first to speak and to punish and excommunicate people, so yes, he spoke with authority.
I don't see what being difficult to understand has anything to do with having authority.
Mathew 16:19 in light of Isiah 22 is what proves the line of succession - a king (Jesus) gave keys to the kingdom (heaven) to his chief stewart (Peter) that has the power to open and shut (bind and loose) and is passed down to his posterity (bishops).
I'm the one who actually quotes from and relies on the word of God here, not you. You haven't quoted a single Bible verse to back up any of your erroneous opinions. I haven't assumed anything about you unless you ignored questions multiple times or danced around it, then it's a safe bet to assume you have something to hide or you are stuck in your hard-headed opinions. Stop rebelling against God (Romans 13:1-2).When did I say I think I'm not an ungodly rebel? More assumptions and lies from you.
But you like passing off your opinions as if they were facts even when they go directly
against the express Word of God, and then you want others to follow your lead.
You're talking about centuries? Peter was dead by the time the church arrived in Rome.
I provided dozens of Bible verses proving Peter was chief among disciples, you haven't addressed any.
Orthodox church separated themselves in the 11th century, and their line of succession does not come from Peter.
No, that's from the Bible. You don't get to dismiss biblical proof without refuting it first.Well...that's your story and you're sticking to it.
Got you, you lying narcissist! You keep quoting me out of context because you don't actually read anything before replaying with blind ignorance! That's not what I said. I said...More of your lies.
More of your lies. Ho hum.Got you, you lying narcissist! You keep quoting me out of context because you don't actually read anything before replaying with blind ignorance! That's not what I said. I said...
I haven't assumed anything about you unless you ignored questions multiple times or danced around it, then it's a safe bet to assume you have something to hide or you are stuck in your hard-headed opinions.
Where does he say that?
What does that have to do with anything?
You haven't quoted a single Bible verse to back up any of your erroneous opinions.
Jesus Christ is the Truth, and the way to the Father
![]()
John 10:27-28
![]()
everyone knows there is a God. They simply suppress the Truth.
And they are without excuse.
You want to say atheists are good people when God calls them fools.
Everything has been disputed. You just don't like what you are hearing. But that won't change. So...grace and peace.No, that's from the Bible. You don't get to dismiss biblical proof without refuting it first.