This all started in another thread because you did not include your source, so saying it is a crime
to discuss outside sources with me is very dishonest of you when I was the first to ask you for
your source. Your whole post is more misrepresentations from you. That is what you should not
bother with. Try being honest for a change. Or is that asking for too much? Is there a Scripture
verse that says the Lord says a believer can receive a thorn in his side? No, but you claim there
is just because Paul had one. Don't blame me because you dislike being held accountable.
to discuss outside sources with me is very dishonest of you when I was the first to ask you for
your source. Your whole post is more misrepresentations from you. That is what you should not
bother with. Try being honest for a change. Or is that asking for too much? Is there a Scripture
verse that says the Lord says a believer can receive a thorn in his side? No, but you claim there
is just because Paul had one. Don't blame me because you dislike being held accountable.
I told you from the begining my source I have studied for 12 months.
Are you that naive that you cant the word source means outside information.
So why then would you reply are you saying you have wrote this.
Because you knew source means out side information.
See your also refusing to see because Paul a christian reçieved a thorn in his fles no one else can.
So the scripture that says a person can be tested in fire must be false for you specifically to you then,
Or your so perfect you could never reçieve a thorn in your flesh, but then wait are you going to say your more perfect than Paul