The sin of refusing sex
- Thread starter presidente
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
It does make sense in the passage, but it was hardly the blueprint for a godly marriage.
I Corinthians chapter 7
[1] Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.
[2] Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
[3] Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.
[4] The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.
[5] Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
[6] But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment.
[7] For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.
[8] I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I.
[9] But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.
For starters, Paul was apparently answering a question that the Corinthians had written to him.
His initial response to that question was that it is good for a man not to touch a woman.
He then gave a stipulation for those who could not contain in that they apparently burned with sexual passion so that they might avoid fornication or avoid sexual relations outside of the confines of marriage.
That stipulation was that it is better to marry than to possibly fall into fornication due to their seemingly unbridled passions.
Does anyone reading this honestly believe that this was Paul's/Christ's ultimate desire for Christians and the ordinance of marriage?
Again, marriage is supposed to be a natural reflection of the spiritual union between Christ and his church.
Does Christ lust after the church with unbridled passion?
If you (collectively or individually) think that he does, then you're (ditto) greatly deceived.
Isn't one of the fruits of the Spirit temperance or self-control?
Shouldn't those who belong to Christ crucify their flesh with the affections and lusts thereof?
Galatians chapter 5
[22] But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
[23] Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.
[24] And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.
I mean, come on.
Let's not forget that Paul addressed these same Christians as being "carnal" while rebuking them for such things as allowing a man to have his father's wife and for behaving like gluttons and drunkards at the communion table. In other words, they were hardly the blueprint for Christianity themselves.
Again, some of the stipulations that Paul gave to these Corinthians was hardly God's best or true desire for his people, so let's not take a stipulation and make it the rule, okay?
Anyhow, before I got married, I was celibate for approximately 15 years, and I've been celibate now for a few years since my divorce.
It might surprise you to hear that I don't walk around with my tongue hanging out of my mouth while lusting after every woman that walks by.
Seriously, are there any Christians who have the fruit of temperance actively working in their lives?
Are there any Christians who see PEOPLE as PEOPLE, and NOT just as objects of selfish sexual pleasures?
Maybe I'm from another planet or something, but I actually look for godly qualities in a woman, and that's what truly "turns me on".
Anyhow, I should be sleeping right now, so good night.
I Corinthians chapter 7
[1] Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.
[2] Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
[3] Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.
[4] The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.
[5] Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
[6] But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment.
[7] For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.
[8] I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I.
[9] But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.
For starters, Paul was apparently answering a question that the Corinthians had written to him.
His initial response to that question was that it is good for a man not to touch a woman.
He then gave a stipulation for those who could not contain in that they apparently burned with sexual passion so that they might avoid fornication or avoid sexual relations outside of the confines of marriage.
That stipulation was that it is better to marry than to possibly fall into fornication due to their seemingly unbridled passions.
Does anyone reading this honestly believe that this was Paul's/Christ's ultimate desire for Christians and the ordinance of marriage?
Again, marriage is supposed to be a natural reflection of the spiritual union between Christ and his church.
Does Christ lust after the church with unbridled passion?
If you (collectively or individually) think that he does, then you're (ditto) greatly deceived.
Isn't one of the fruits of the Spirit temperance or self-control?
Shouldn't those who belong to Christ crucify their flesh with the affections and lusts thereof?
Galatians chapter 5
[22] But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
[23] Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.
[24] And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.
I mean, come on.
Let's not forget that Paul addressed these same Christians as being "carnal" while rebuking them for such things as allowing a man to have his father's wife and for behaving like gluttons and drunkards at the communion table. In other words, they were hardly the blueprint for Christianity themselves.
Again, some of the stipulations that Paul gave to these Corinthians was hardly God's best or true desire for his people, so let's not take a stipulation and make it the rule, okay?
Anyhow, before I got married, I was celibate for approximately 15 years, and I've been celibate now for a few years since my divorce.
It might surprise you to hear that I don't walk around with my tongue hanging out of my mouth while lusting after every woman that walks by.
Seriously, are there any Christians who have the fruit of temperance actively working in their lives?
Are there any Christians who see PEOPLE as PEOPLE, and NOT just as objects of selfish sexual pleasures?
Maybe I'm from another planet or something, but I actually look for godly qualities in a woman, and that's what truly "turns me on".
Anyhow, I should be sleeping right now, so good night.
-
1
- Show all
K
Several posts back I asked if we were in agreement. So, for the rat's tail's sake, lets start again. From here, what have I misunderstood?
But we're not discussing all aspects of marriage. We were discussing the thread title. There's reams of things that can be discussed on marriage, but that's not what the thread is talking about.
Umm, I posted the Bible verses.
I think the verses are direct and clear. What broader view do you feel I am missing?
I don't know what you think is being missed in those verses. Again, share what you think I missed.
But we're not discussing all aspects of marriage. We were discussing the thread title. There's reams of things that can be discussed on marriage, but that's not what the thread is talking about.
Umm, I posted the Bible verses.
I think the verses are direct and clear. What broader view do you feel I am missing?
I don't know what you think is being missed in those verses. Again, share what you think I missed.
Your the one using the language 'lust... with unbridled passion.' The Greek word translated 'lust' is along lines of 'covet' in the 10 commandments. Compare with wording with the LXX of the ten commandments to see what I mean. Paul also wrote, as the KJV translates it, "I had not known lust if the law had not said Thou shalt not covet."
Coveting is something that can be done over other people's stuff. The Ten Commandment warns against coveting your neighbor's house, wife, donkey, etc. You don't covet your own wife, donkey, house, etc. because they are yours already.
How do you know that marriage is supposed to be the union of Christ and the church? Paul... who wrote I Corinthians 7... wrote about this. He even writes in Ephesians 5 that two shall be one flesh speaks about the mystery of Christ and the church. Paul writes about the concept of two becoming one in I Corinthians 6 in arguing against having sex with a prostitute, so two becoming one flesh has a sexual meaning to it.
So you might want to reconsider your opposition to the idea of Christ passionately desiring the church. I'm sanitizing it from the terminology you used with the word 'lust' which has some negative connotations.
Having a desire to have a sexual relationship might rightly be a deciding factor when considering to choose a life of celibacy or marriage. But more consideration should be given about ___who__ to marry than just finding a sex partner.
Paul wrote that it is better to marry than to burn. Some translations throw 'with passion' to that. The Greek word is used elsewhere when Paul asks who sins and he does not burn. It has to do with emotion. The word is apparently not specifically a word for burning with sexual passion. That's how some translators take it in that passage.
There may be some emotional aspects to us that could make us susceptible to fornication. Some girls may fall into sexual sin through a desire for romantic attention from a man, even if it isn't all about sexual fantasies or what have you. I think we should consider that someone might 'burn' with a desire to have children and a family, and the the idea of life-long celibacy may be difficult for that reason also.
So do you think this means married Christians should ration sex to their partners? 'Lust' is often used to refer to _inappropriate_ desires in scripture rather than appropriate ones. There may be some exceptions.
Do you think the word 'temperance' there has to do with rationing the husband or wife down to once a month or something like that?
Btw, I don't think anyone is endorsing marriage to one's father's wife in here. Regarding food, I don't recall Paul mentioning gluttony at the Lord's table. He said one man is hungry and another is drunken. He told them to wait for one another. Maybe those with food ate it up before the poor slaves who had no food were able to get away and arrive late. Anyway, Paul said if any man is hungry, let him eat at home. If you eat two or three times a day except for an occasional fast, is that a 'temperate' lifestyle?
My wife and I were virgins when we got married, but I really did want a wife and various benefits that came with that.
Accepting what Paul teaches in I Corinthians does not mean one does not see people as people. I see my wife as a person.
I was picky as a single man, not just about looks, but about values, beliefs, and character.
Coveting is something that can be done over other people's stuff. The Ten Commandment warns against coveting your neighbor's house, wife, donkey, etc. You don't covet your own wife, donkey, house, etc. because they are yours already.
How do you know that marriage is supposed to be the union of Christ and the church? Paul... who wrote I Corinthians 7... wrote about this. He even writes in Ephesians 5 that two shall be one flesh speaks about the mystery of Christ and the church. Paul writes about the concept of two becoming one in I Corinthians 6 in arguing against having sex with a prostitute, so two becoming one flesh has a sexual meaning to it.
So you might want to reconsider your opposition to the idea of Christ passionately desiring the church. I'm sanitizing it from the terminology you used with the word 'lust' which has some negative connotations.
Having a desire to have a sexual relationship might rightly be a deciding factor when considering to choose a life of celibacy or marriage. But more consideration should be given about ___who__ to marry than just finding a sex partner.
Paul wrote that it is better to marry than to burn. Some translations throw 'with passion' to that. The Greek word is used elsewhere when Paul asks who sins and he does not burn. It has to do with emotion. The word is apparently not specifically a word for burning with sexual passion. That's how some translators take it in that passage.
There may be some emotional aspects to us that could make us susceptible to fornication. Some girls may fall into sexual sin through a desire for romantic attention from a man, even if it isn't all about sexual fantasies or what have you. I think we should consider that someone might 'burn' with a desire to have children and a family, and the the idea of life-long celibacy may be difficult for that reason also.
So do you think this means married Christians should ration sex to their partners? 'Lust' is often used to refer to _inappropriate_ desires in scripture rather than appropriate ones. There may be some exceptions.
Do you think the word 'temperance' there has to do with rationing the husband or wife down to once a month or something like that?
Btw, I don't think anyone is endorsing marriage to one's father's wife in here. Regarding food, I don't recall Paul mentioning gluttony at the Lord's table. He said one man is hungry and another is drunken. He told them to wait for one another. Maybe those with food ate it up before the poor slaves who had no food were able to get away and arrive late. Anyway, Paul said if any man is hungry, let him eat at home. If you eat two or three times a day except for an occasional fast, is that a 'temperate' lifestyle?
My wife and I were virgins when we got married, but I really did want a wife and various benefits that came with that.
Accepting what Paul teaches in I Corinthians does not mean one does not see people as people. I see my wife as a person.
I was picky as a single man, not just about looks, but about values, beliefs, and character.
-
1
- Show all
K
No one has attacked anyone's understanding of Scripture. The verses were posted, and are clear. If we all just have our own sentiment of the Word or understanding then pray tell, how do we have unity? Now here are the verses again. You tell me how they are unclear or how there can be a different understanding.
3 Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.
4 The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.
5 Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
Where can this be misunderstood or taken another way? What am I missing?
On second thought, I think trying to read through all this (100+ posts since I left off) will be a fruitless waste of time. Somehow I get the feeling that attempting to comment on almost anything here is just going to leave me running in circles like a dog chasing its own tail.
Once upon a time I married an amazing godly man, we had sex (
did she just say that!!!??? ), and the result was a housefull of youngsters that keep my days blessed, long, and busy. Trying to read through all these, and who said what, and what did they really mean, etc. etc. is somehow MORE tiring than my kids have ever made me feel.
Good luck Kala.
-
1
- Show all
Dolly Parton. He posted lyrics from one of her songs.
I must have missed the post with lyrics
Or maybe I saw them but did not realize it was a Dolly song -
1
- Show all
Well, since you asked, you're seemingly missing the part about the husband rendering unto the wife due BENEVOLENCE and likewise also the wife rendering the same unto the husband in verse 3 which precedes what Paul said about their bodies in verse 4.
The underlying Greek word which is here translated as "benevolence" is "eunoia"...
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g2133/kjv/tr/0-1/
...and it only appears here and one other place in the entire New Testament.
The other place is in Ephesians 6:7 where it is translated as "good will":
"With good will doing service, as to the Lord, and not to men:" (Eph. 6:7)
Here is how I Corinthians 7:3 reads in some other Bible translations:
"Let the husband render to his wife the affection due her, and likewise also the wife to her husband." - NKJV
"The husband must fulfill his [marital] duty to his wife [with good will and kindness], and likewise the wife to her husband." - Amplified Bible
"Let a man bestow to his wife the love that is owed; in this way also, the woman to her husband." - Aramaic Bible in Plain English
"Let the husband render to his wife the affection owed her, and likewise also the wife to her husband." - World English Bible
Seeing how Paul plainly addressed this DUE BENEVOLENCE FIRST, why such an outrage here towards those like Polar and myself who basically are asking "Where is the love?"
To listen to some of you, and you in particular, you make it sound as if a woman just needs to roll over because "Hubby's home, and it's time for him to plow the field".
Anyhow, that's the impression that I've gotten from reading some of your comments here.
I have to get ready for work now.
I'll address the other posts/comments which were addressed towards me later today.
The underlying Greek word which is here translated as "benevolence" is "eunoia"...
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g2133/kjv/tr/0-1/
...and it only appears here and one other place in the entire New Testament.
The other place is in Ephesians 6:7 where it is translated as "good will":
"With good will doing service, as to the Lord, and not to men:" (Eph. 6:7)
Here is how I Corinthians 7:3 reads in some other Bible translations:
"Let the husband render to his wife the affection due her, and likewise also the wife to her husband." - NKJV
"The husband must fulfill his [marital] duty to his wife [with good will and kindness], and likewise the wife to her husband." - Amplified Bible
"Let a man bestow to his wife the love that is owed; in this way also, the woman to her husband." - Aramaic Bible in Plain English
"Let the husband render to his wife the affection owed her, and likewise also the wife to her husband." - World English Bible
Seeing how Paul plainly addressed this DUE BENEVOLENCE FIRST, why such an outrage here towards those like Polar and myself who basically are asking "Where is the love?"
To listen to some of you, and you in particular, you make it sound as if a woman just needs to roll over because "Hubby's home, and it's time for him to plow the field".
Anyhow, that's the impression that I've gotten from reading some of your comments here.
I have to get ready for work now.
I'll address the other posts/comments which were addressed towards me later today.
-
1
- Show all
P
Well we don't really do planned marriages here and they did in Israel so that is not a comparison really, but yes the husband should still love his wife. I think in India they still do that but they do not consult the Bible. Sex is glamorized here and porn is a giant problem as well.
I am not sure of your reference to 'robot', Did I mention that somewhere? I don't remember at this point.
I am not sure of your reference to 'robot', Did I mention that somewhere? I don't remember at this point.
K
But I didn't miss that part. I posted the entire verses. I believe more than once. This is a long thread and I have responded since the beginning. So you would have to go back and read all I have said on the subject. But it hasn't been that many posts back that I gave the entire verses.
Again, the subject was made clear before either of you came to the thread, and I repeated, that we had said we were talking about a healthy Christian marriage. People from the first of the thread brought up health issues, or past trauma, but we weren't discussing that, and that was made clear.
Well, to be fair, maybe it's because you stopped listening to what I was saying and decided Polar was correct in all they were saying. I specifically spoke about "meeting each others needs" I specifically spoke about my sisters issue in her abusive marriage. And since you don't know me, or have read many of my posts you have made assumptions because you decided to take sides. I have spoken at length about abusive marriages in threads that I or others have started. I'm not trying to be mean, but you really haven't been here long enough to make the judgement call you are making.
Second point, why do you and Polar seem to think that it's about the woman rolling over to "perform" for sex. You both do understand that there are men with no sex drive? There are wives that live in sexless marriages. And you both said there is a broader POV yet both of you never brought that point up. Again, you're both making assumptions and drawing conclusions that are hardly fair. You're new here, so I can give you the benefit of not reading my posts on these subjects. Polar has never spoken to me before this that I know of, so maybe she also hasn't read my posts on this. But if you had, neither of you would be making the judgement call you are. That's sad.
Yes, some, and do you think you've made a fair assessment based on a handful of comments to one person? Because you seem like a fair minded and balanced person to me. Now that you have read this post, where do you stand?
Again, the subject was made clear before either of you came to the thread, and I repeated, that we had said we were talking about a healthy Christian marriage. People from the first of the thread brought up health issues, or past trauma, but we weren't discussing that, and that was made clear.
Well, to be fair, maybe it's because you stopped listening to what I was saying and decided Polar was correct in all they were saying. I specifically spoke about "meeting each others needs" I specifically spoke about my sisters issue in her abusive marriage. And since you don't know me, or have read many of my posts you have made assumptions because you decided to take sides. I have spoken at length about abusive marriages in threads that I or others have started. I'm not trying to be mean, but you really haven't been here long enough to make the judgement call you are making.
Second point, why do you and Polar seem to think that it's about the woman rolling over to "perform" for sex. You both do understand that there are men with no sex drive? There are wives that live in sexless marriages. And you both said there is a broader POV yet both of you never brought that point up. Again, you're both making assumptions and drawing conclusions that are hardly fair. You're new here, so I can give you the benefit of not reading my posts on these subjects. Polar has never spoken to me before this that I know of, so maybe she also hasn't read my posts on this. But if you had, neither of you would be making the judgement call you are. That's sad.
Yes, some, and do you think you've made a fair assessment based on a handful of comments to one person? Because you seem like a fair minded and balanced person to me. Now that you have read this post, where do you stand?
I don't think that everyone understands what a healthy, happy, and whole life and marriage is.
They are accustomed to being sick, manipulative, and deceitful their whole lives....they can't live any other way and yet believe that they are well. That's the real issue. They don't want to be well. They are extremely comfortable living the narcissistic lifestyle and know of nothing else.
Jesus asked the crippled man in John 5 that very strange question, "Do you want to be well? ".
For some people the truthful answer is "NO".
They are accustomed to being sick, manipulative, and deceitful their whole lives....they can't live any other way and yet believe that they are well. That's the real issue. They don't want to be well. They are extremely comfortable living the narcissistic lifestyle and know of nothing else.
Jesus asked the crippled man in John 5 that very strange question, "Do you want to be well? ".
For some people the truthful answer is "NO".
-
1
- Show all
P
You surly are tenacious. I'll give you that.
Tell you what, Live4Him3 is doing a much better job of explaining it than I did and you seem to not address him with telling him but but this thread is just about refusing sex is a sin. (actually insisting and insisting might be considered one too. Some husbands, yes so called Christian husbands, force themselves on their wife. That is not kind or loving.)
I did bring up the fact that marriage is compared to Christ's relationship with us yesterday and he did too. I have also said quite a few times that marriage is far more than rendering sex.
Seriously? Show me one thread in this forum or any other, that does not, sooner or later, veer off and sometimes even turn into another thread. Frankly I don't think it makes much sense to discuss sex. Yes yes I know. Christian marriage and all that which actually should not leave out the spiritual aspect since sex is not just a physical act.
1 Corinthians 6:16-19 New American Standard Bible - NASB 1995 (NASB1995)
Or do you not know that the one who joins himself to a prostitute is one body with her? For He says, “THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH.” But the one who joins himself to the Lord is one spirit with Him. Flee immorality. Every other sin that a man commits is outside the body, but the immoral man sins against his own body. Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God, and that you are not your own?
Why does it seem to bother you so much to address the bigger equation? I quite honestly think it somewhat ridiculous to look at the one verse or 2 and say 'we cannot look at anything else'. Even the op is looking at other scripture so if that is how you really feel, that is that we should only discuss not rendering sex is a sin, then kindly move on. I had enough yesterday to last to the end of the month and I don't need more of it.
- Status