I do (think/know) it to be impossible that all three (Gen 17-19) are/were God.
I don't feel comfortable constraining God within humanly known time, space or matter.
I do (think/know) it to be impossible that all three (Gen 17-19) are/were God.
confused by this postI don't feel comfortable constraining God within humanly known time, space or matter.
Gabriel was specified by "the voice of a man calling from between the banks of the Ulai," and Daniel specified of Gabriel in chapter 9, "the man I had seen in the earlier vision (v.21). There is no referral for the one speaking in chapter 10 except to the man with the eyes like flaming fire. Is there any biblical instance where these eyes are attributed to anyone other than the Son of God as in Revelation 2:18?Daniel already knew who the "he" (Gabriel) was since Dan. 7-9. See also vs 16,19. If you do a word comparison between chapters 7-10, you will see it is Gabriel speaking, having been sent by the Son of God.
With God, I mean, I can't "know" that what, or if, anything is "impossible," considering He can exist paradoxically both within the infinite the finite, as demonstrated by the Son.confused by this post
while Michael/Jesus (Son of God) deals with the devil
That is what I said.Gabriel & Michael are seperate beings.
You mock at what you clearly do not understand.my, this seemingly innocent statement brings up some interesting questions!
how long does it take God to 'deal with the devil' ?
is that an hard problem for God?
Jesus is my Savior! NOWHERE in the Bible does it say Michael is the Savior. You can't find even one Scripture that says CLEARLY that Michael is the Savior!!!Mic 7:18: "Who is a God like unto thee, that pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of his heritage? he retaineth not his anger for ever, because he delighteth in mercy."
Can't find Michael as Savior? That's because he isn't.Notice the words carefully. "Jesus" is the name of the Son "under heaven" "given among men". Michael is the name originally from Heaven amongst the hosts therein:
Rev 12:7: "And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,".
Did you read, "Michael", "in heaven", "his angels"? , So what about that do you think contradicts the verse you gave or is somehow not in harmony or agreement with it?
This (verse) is the most compelling evidence against Michael being Jesus and so not God, that is if the 'me' in this verse is Jesus. Backing up to verse 5, "I lifted up my eyes and behold there was a certain man dressed in linen...body was like beryl, face like the brilliance of lightning, his eyes like flaming torches...voice like the sound of a multitude" whom Daniel saw, later in chapter 12, two others appear and one ask of him, "How long...?" which suggests that this "man" has exclusive insight the others do not. However, he does speak well in reference to Michael.
Only Satan's children believe Michael is their Savior!Yes, but by leaving out vs 7 and it's "maketh" it alters the meaning of which "angels" are being spoken about, iow the created, not the uncreated angel of vs 2-3, the very "fellow" of the other lesser messengers. I continually have asked you questions, but your practice even until now is to not address them directly.
You mock at what you clearly do not understand.
Daniel was mourning and fasting in Daniel 10 for 3 weeks in the 1st Month of the 3rd year of Cyrus II. Do you know why? (I do) If you understand this, you will understand why Jesus/Michael was needed against the devil, and why satan was not instantly destroyed and why Cyrus II needed encouraging by Jesus/Michael against the devil's insinuations. Read Daniel 9, 2 Chronicles 36 to help your study so that you may no longer appear foolish and ignorant of these things.
Look again, lest you have the Son of God (clothed linen) being less knowledgeable in prophecy than others.Gabriel was specified by "the voice of a man calling from between the banks of the Ulai," and Daniel specified of Gabriel in chapter 9, "the man I had seen in the earlier vision (v.21). There is no referral for the one speaking in chapter 10 except to the man with the eyes like flaming fire. Is there any biblical instance where these eyes are attributed to anyone other than the Son of God as in Revelation 2:18?
You seem to be monologuing off topic to yourself. I'm going to continue with what I am doing with engaging in discussion of the topic with those that reciprocate in answering questions.hmm i certainly do not think that praising the power of the Almighty God
Look again, lest you have the Son of God (clothed linen) being less knowledgeable in prophecy than others.
Y
the And" beginning chapter 11 indicates a continuation from chapter 10
I am sure Michael is disgusted with the people who try to make him into their Savior. Just like Mary is disgusted with those who make her into the Queen of Heaven. And Peter must be disgusted with those who claim that the papacy originated with him.Only Satan's children believe Michael is their Savior!
Thanks all, I wonder why no SDA is responding?