GOD DOES NOT MAKE MISTAKES!!!
HE MADE NO MISTAKES IN THE OLD TESTAMENT NOR IN THE NEW TESTAMENT
right
what conclusion do we draw from that?
Lots. God did not cancel the old covenants because He had made an error. Some things are obsolete, but God didn't cancel anything He did. When God told people not to mix things, it was no mistake. When the blood of animals was used as a symbol of the blood of Christ for the atonement of sins, it was no mistake. When scripture says angels married Hebrew women, that is what it means. When scripture suggests that it would be good to celebrate God's plan with feasts and celebrations, it is no mistaken idea or meant as a burden, but as fun. We can rely on the holiness and truth of the Lord.right
what conclusion do we draw from that?
Lots. God did not cancel the old covenants because He had made an error. Some things are obsolete, but God didn't cancel anything He did. When God told people not to mix things, it was no mistake. When the blood of animals was used as a symbol of the blood of Christ for the atonement of sins, it was no mistake. When scripture says angels married Hebrew women, that is what it means. When scripture suggests that it would be good to celebrate God's plan with feasts and celebrations, it is no mistaken idea or meant as a burden, but as fun. We can rely on the holiness and truth of the Lord.
The argument is much, much deeper than what day to go to church. It is about believing the old testament as it tells of creation. Did the Lord work six days, rest on the last day of the week and give us this day to rest on? Did the new covenant change that? Did Mary change the day, did she find Christ rose on Sunday or did she discover that Christ had risen already on Sunday? If Christ rose on Sunday, did that change what we learn in Genesis? Being a Christian means we accept what Christ did for us, does determining the Sabbath really matter?why argue over what day we worship on.......we should worship everyday
That is a fancy way of saying you don't believe the old testament. If Christ wasn't explaining the law but He was making new laws, then we have to determine which is God, the Son or the Father. That doesn't make sense.i'm new here so i'm not sure if your being sarcastic????
the only laws we can bring over into the New Testament are the ones Jesus taught and brought over.
why argue over what day we worship on.......we should worship everyday
The argument is much, much deeper than what day to go to church. It is about believing the old testament as it tells of creation. Did the Lord work six days, rest on the last day of the week and give us this day to rest on? Did the new covenant change that? Did Mary change the day, did she find Christ rose on Sunday or did she discover that Christ had risen already on Sunday? If Christ rose on Sunday, did that change what we learn in Genesis? Being a Christian means we accept what Christ did for us, does determining the Sabbath really matter?
Do you think the new covenant (new commandment) is telling us to go to church on Sunday?you're right that the 'argument' ((the basis, the analysis and the justification)) are much, much deeper than is being discussed.
a new commandment I give you(John 13:34)in the saying 'new,' He hath made the first old (Hebrews 8:13)
Again, you have paraphrased someone's words and completely misrepresented them. Why do you keep doing this?That is a fancy way of saying you don't believe the old testament. If Christ wasn't explaining the law but He was making new laws, then we have to determine which is God, the Son or the Father. That doesn't make sense.
That is a fancy way of saying you don't believe the old testament. If Christ wasn't explaining the law but He was making new laws, then we have to determine which is God, the Son or the Father. That doesn't make sense.
I get what you mean about worshiping every day. But if you think about it worship can only be called worship if it is in Truth of the word. Meaning you should have biblical meaning for what you worship. Example Cane and Able both worshiped God by giving their gift to God but only one did it in truth.that God had a reason for the laws and feast days etc in the Old Testament.....he certainly didn't make a mistake.
Jesus is the fulfillment of the Old Testament
why argue over what day we worship on.......we should worship everyday
Actually, you did. He just paraphrased your words. If you don't like it when others do it to you, don't do it to others.You changed what I wrote completely with your "pagans kept their own version". I said nothing of the kind.
Christ said "you have been told" and then Christ stated a law. Then Christ said "but I tell you". Some say, as you have, that a law must be repeated by Christ to be accepted. However, that was spoken to a large group of Jews who had absolute faith in the law. What was new was that Christ explained the laws, giving them in the spirit of the Lord instead of by hard and fast rules.i believe the old testament....i'm just not sure what your question is?
you said "If Christ wasn't explaining the law but He was making new laws, then we have to determine which is God, the Son or the Father. That doesn't make sense."????? huh
i think your wanting to talk about Saturday & Sunday????
which one of these days are you a Christian on?
Since you disagreed with my assessment of your paraphrase of AlmondJoy's statement, how about you step up and explain how you got "That's a fancy way of saying you don't believe the old testament" out of "the only laws we can bring over into the New Testament are the ones Jesus taught and brought over."That is a fancy way of saying you don't believe the old testament. If Christ wasn't explaining the law but He was making new laws, then we have to determine which is God, the Son or the Father. That doesn't make sense.
Wow... you really seem stuck in black-and-white thinking. It's like you can't see anything between radical extremes.Christ said "you have been told" and then Christ stated a law. Then Christ said "but I tell you". Some say, as you have, that a law must be repeated by Christ to be accepted. However, that was spoken to a large group of Jews who had absolute faith in the law. What was new was that Christ explained the laws, giving them in the spirit of the Lord instead of by hard and fast rules.
If you say the Christ cancelled the old rules and gave new ones, then you are saying that Christ has taken away the power of the old God and is a new God for us. I do not think that is so. Christ told us He and the Father were one. Christ always was in complete agreement with the Father. We must conclude that Christ was explaining the law, not taking over from from the Father.
OK he literally calls it "the day called that of the sun" in Greek. No bones about it, he is talking about sunday, the day after the sabbath of the Jews.
200 years before Constantine the church fathers were without controversy saying that Christian tradition was to meet in the 8th day / 1st day and also adamantly affirming that this was the day Christ rose. This is one generation from the apostles themselves, people who sat at the feet of the apostles.
'blah blah Constantine changed the day Christians met' is rubbish. These people were being killed just for believing in Christ, you think they would go along with being forced to worship on a different day? Nope.
All that said, sunday is not sabbath. Christians don't meet on sabbath, that was never a command given to us - were not observing sabbath when we meet; that's not the purpose.
and anyone calling the 8th day 'Christian sabbath' is every bit as confused as the SDA.
so you would rather follow tradition rather than God? Paul says follow me as I follow Christ it was Christ’s custom to keep the Sabbath it was Paul’s custom so should it be ours. Regardless of who changed it, it was changed only in ignorance. And what I mean by changed is he set the decree. Anyways man cannot change God‘s laws.OK he literally calls it "the day called that of the sun" in Greek. No bones about it, he is talking about sunday, the day after the sabbath of the Jews.
200 years before Constantine the church fathers were without controversy saying that Christian tradition was to meet in the 8th day / 1st day and also adamantly affirming that this was the day Christ rose. This is one generation from the apostles themselves, people who sat at the feet of the apostles.
'blah blah Constantine changed the day Christians met' is rubbish. These people were being killed just for believing in Christ, you think they would go along with being forced to worship on a different day? Nope.
All that said, sunday is not sabbath. Christians don't meet on sabbath, that was never a command given to us - were not observing sabbath when we meet; that's not the purpose.
and anyone calling the 8th day 'Christian sabbath' is every bit as confused as the SDA.