Today’s church’s misunderstandings

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

AlmondJoy

Active member
Oct 31, 2020
245
71
28
GOD DOES NOT MAKE MISTAKES!!!

HE MADE NO MISTAKES IN THE OLD TESTAMENT NOR IN THE NEW TESTAMENT
 

AlmondJoy

Active member
Oct 31, 2020
245
71
28
right

what conclusion do we draw from that?
that God had a reason for the laws and feast days etc in the Old Testament.....he certainly didn't make a mistake.

Jesus is the fulfillment of the Old Testament

why argue over what day we worship on.......we should worship everyday
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
right

what conclusion do we draw from that?
Lots. God did not cancel the old covenants because He had made an error. Some things are obsolete, but God didn't cancel anything He did. When God told people not to mix things, it was no mistake. When the blood of animals was used as a symbol of the blood of Christ for the atonement of sins, it was no mistake. When scripture says angels married Hebrew women, that is what it means. When scripture suggests that it would be good to celebrate God's plan with feasts and celebrations, it is no mistaken idea or meant as a burden, but as fun. We can rely on the holiness and truth of the Lord.
 

AlmondJoy

Active member
Oct 31, 2020
245
71
28
Lots. God did not cancel the old covenants because He had made an error. Some things are obsolete, but God didn't cancel anything He did. When God told people not to mix things, it was no mistake. When the blood of animals was used as a symbol of the blood of Christ for the atonement of sins, it was no mistake. When scripture says angels married Hebrew women, that is what it means. When scripture suggests that it would be good to celebrate God's plan with feasts and celebrations, it is no mistaken idea or meant as a burden, but as fun. We can rely on the holiness and truth of the Lord.
i'm new here so i'm not sure if your being sarcastic????

the only laws we can bring over into the New Testament are the ones Jesus taught and brought over.
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
why argue over what day we worship on.......we should worship everyday
The argument is much, much deeper than what day to go to church. It is about believing the old testament as it tells of creation. Did the Lord work six days, rest on the last day of the week and give us this day to rest on? Did the new covenant change that? Did Mary change the day, did she find Christ rose on Sunday or did she discover that Christ had risen already on Sunday? If Christ rose on Sunday, did that change what we learn in Genesis? Being a Christian means we accept what Christ did for us, does determining the Sabbath really matter?
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
i'm new here so i'm not sure if your being sarcastic????

the only laws we can bring over into the New Testament are the ones Jesus taught and brought over.
That is a fancy way of saying you don't believe the old testament. If Christ wasn't explaining the law but He was making new laws, then we have to determine which is God, the Son or the Father. That doesn't make sense.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,954
13,615
113
The argument is much, much deeper than what day to go to church. It is about believing the old testament as it tells of creation. Did the Lord work six days, rest on the last day of the week and give us this day to rest on? Did the new covenant change that? Did Mary change the day, did she find Christ rose on Sunday or did she discover that Christ had risen already on Sunday? If Christ rose on Sunday, did that change what we learn in Genesis? Being a Christian means we accept what Christ did for us, does determining the Sabbath really matter?
you're right that the 'argument' ((the basis, the analysis and the justification)) are much, much deeper than is being discussed.
a new commandment I give you
(John 13:34)
in the saying 'new,' He hath made the first old
(Hebrews 8:13)
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
you're right that the 'argument' ((the basis, the analysis and the justification)) are much, much deeper than is being discussed.
a new commandment I give you
(John 13:34)
in the saying 'new,' He hath made the first old
(Hebrews 8:13)
Do you think the new covenant (new commandment) is telling us to go to church on Sunday?
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,602
13,861
113
That is a fancy way of saying you don't believe the old testament. If Christ wasn't explaining the law but He was making new laws, then we have to determine which is God, the Son or the Father. That doesn't make sense.
Again, you have paraphrased someone's words and completely misrepresented them. Why do you keep doing this?
 

AlmondJoy

Active member
Oct 31, 2020
245
71
28
That is a fancy way of saying you don't believe the old testament. If Christ wasn't explaining the law but He was making new laws, then we have to determine which is God, the Son or the Father. That doesn't make sense.
i believe the old testament....i'm just not sure what your question is?

you said "If Christ wasn't explaining the law but He was making new laws, then we have to determine which is God, the Son or the Father. That doesn't make sense."????? huh

i think your wanting to talk about Saturday & Sunday????

which one of these days are you a Christian on?
 

laymen

Senior Member
Apr 6, 2014
680
102
43
faithlife.com
that God had a reason for the laws and feast days etc in the Old Testament.....he certainly didn't make a mistake.

Jesus is the fulfillment of the Old Testament

why argue over what day we worship on.......we should worship everyday
I get what you mean about worshiping every day. But if you think about it worship can only be called worship if it is in Truth of the word. Meaning you should have biblical meaning for what you worship. Example Cane and Able both worshiped God by giving their gift to God but only one did it in truth.
 

AlmondJoy

Active member
Oct 31, 2020
245
71
28
i totally agree that we must worship in spirit and in truth. A lot of people are trying to worship like Cain did. He knew the sacrifice required blood. yet he brought the fruit of the ground. all while he had hatred and sin in his heart

Genesis 4:6-7 (KJV)
6 And the LORD said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?
7 If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,602
13,861
113
You changed what I wrote completely with your "pagans kept their own version". I said nothing of the kind.
Actually, you did. He just paraphrased your words. If you don't like it when others do it to you, don't do it to others.
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
i believe the old testament....i'm just not sure what your question is?

you said "If Christ wasn't explaining the law but He was making new laws, then we have to determine which is God, the Son or the Father. That doesn't make sense."????? huh

i think your wanting to talk about Saturday & Sunday????

which one of these days are you a Christian on?
Christ said "you have been told" and then Christ stated a law. Then Christ said "but I tell you". Some say, as you have, that a law must be repeated by Christ to be accepted. However, that was spoken to a large group of Jews who had absolute faith in the law. What was new was that Christ explained the laws, giving them in the spirit of the Lord instead of by hard and fast rules.
If you say the Christ cancelled the old rules and gave new ones, then you are saying that Christ has taken away the power of the old God and is a new God for us. I do not think that is so. Christ told us He and the Father were one. Christ always was in complete agreement with the Father. We must conclude that Christ was explaining the law, not taking over from from the Father.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,602
13,861
113
That is a fancy way of saying you don't believe the old testament. If Christ wasn't explaining the law but He was making new laws, then we have to determine which is God, the Son or the Father. That doesn't make sense.
Since you disagreed with my assessment of your paraphrase of AlmondJoy's statement, how about you step up and explain how you got "That's a fancy way of saying you don't believe the old testament" out of "the only laws we can bring over into the New Testament are the ones Jesus taught and brought over."

Do you consider it impossible to believe the OT while simultaneously recognizing that it doesn't apply to us in the same way it applied to ancient Israel?
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,602
13,861
113
Christ said "you have been told" and then Christ stated a law. Then Christ said "but I tell you". Some say, as you have, that a law must be repeated by Christ to be accepted. However, that was spoken to a large group of Jews who had absolute faith in the law. What was new was that Christ explained the laws, giving them in the spirit of the Lord instead of by hard and fast rules.
If you say the Christ cancelled the old rules and gave new ones, then you are saying that Christ has taken away the power of the old God and is a new God for us. I do not think that is so. Christ told us He and the Father were one. Christ always was in complete agreement with the Father. We must conclude that Christ was explaining the law, not taking over from from the Father.
Wow... you really seem stuck in black-and-white thinking. It's like you can't see anything between radical extremes.
 

mustaphadrink

Senior Member
Dec 13, 2013
1,987
372
83
OK he literally calls it "the day called that of the sun" in Greek. No bones about it, he is talking about sunday, the day after the sabbath of the Jews.

200 years before Constantine the church fathers were without controversy saying that Christian tradition was to meet in the 8th day / 1st day and also adamantly affirming that this was the day Christ rose. This is one generation from the apostles themselves, people who sat at the feet of the apostles.

'blah blah Constantine changed the day Christians met' is rubbish. These people were being killed just for believing in Christ, you think they would go along with being forced to worship on a different day? Nope.

All that said, sunday is not sabbath. Christians don't meet on sabbath, that was never a command given to us - were not observing sabbath when we meet; that's not the purpose.
and anyone calling the 8th day 'Christian sabbath' is every bit as confused as the SDA.
Having done an extensive study of the the New Testament Church, I must need go by the evidence. The Way, as the NTC was known as was mainy composed of jews who still followed the Jewish custom and feasts. One of them was to meet on the Sabbath. it was unknown to meet on Sunday. In addition they met daily in homes to share meals together, for the appostles teaching, for prayer and fellowship. At no time did they meet together for the eucharist/lord's table/communion. There were no christians in the NTC.

No instruction was needed abut the day of meeting because they autmatically being Jews met on the Sabbath (Saturday) when all the other Jews met.
 

laymen

Senior Member
Apr 6, 2014
680
102
43
faithlife.com
OK he literally calls it "the day called that of the sun" in Greek. No bones about it, he is talking about sunday, the day after the sabbath of the Jews.

200 years before Constantine the church fathers were without controversy saying that Christian tradition was to meet in the 8th day / 1st day and also adamantly affirming that this was the day Christ rose. This is one generation from the apostles themselves, people who sat at the feet of the apostles.

'blah blah Constantine changed the day Christians met' is rubbish. These people were being killed just for believing in Christ, you think they would go along with being forced to worship on a different day? Nope.

All that said, sunday is not sabbath. Christians don't meet on sabbath, that was never a command given to us - were not observing sabbath when we meet; that's not the purpose.
and anyone calling the 8th day 'Christian sabbath' is every bit as confused as the SDA.
so you would rather follow tradition rather than God? Paul says follow me as I follow Christ it was Christ’s custom to keep the Sabbath it was Paul’s custom so should it be ours. Regardless of who changed it, it was changed only in ignorance. And what I mean by changed is he set the decree. Anyways man cannot change God‘s laws.