If you reply, be sure to answer each of these questions by putting your answers in writing so we can both clearly see what a biased contridictory remark and accusation you have just made:
1. What is the title and topic of this thread?
2. Which post did @mustaphadrink quote?
3. What remarks did @mustaphadrink make about "KJV devotees"?
4. What was the theme of @mustaphadrink 's post?
My response: Of course it was an attack on the King James Bible with a slur against Christians that uphold and defend the King James Bible as the inerrant and infallible written Word of God.
1. What is the title and topic of this thread?
2. Which post did @mustaphadrink quote?
3. What remarks did @mustaphadrink make about "KJV devotees"?
4. What was the theme of @mustaphadrink 's post?
My response: Of course it was an attack on the King James Bible with a slur against Christians that uphold and defend the King James Bible as the inerrant and infallible written Word of God.
Yelling isn't going to get you what you want. You come across as though you're about twelve years old; adept enough to form a coherent flow of thought, but demonstrating far too much emotion. Your questions are silly. People can read for themselves what he wrote. I carefully re-read Mustapha's post; nothing in there is an attack on the KJV.
I have concluded a most thorough and extensive research, without relying upon James White's brainwashing book, and have the proof evidence to back up my statements. Far more than you obviously have. My remarks in defense of Gail Riplinger are solid. She is a godly Christian woman that has been grossly slandered by willingly ignorant deceivers. There is a passage in 2Timothy about slanderers that masquerade as Christians. Those are the type of people that have slandered both Jack Chick and Gail Riplinger.
It's rather pathetic that you call a book you clearly haven't read, "brainwashing". Such behaviour doesn't say anything good about your character.
Yes, it is a damnable heresy to defame The Holy Bible that God gave to mankind, only to reproduce others where they have added to and taken away from the written words to adversly affect and change entire doctrines. If you did more research, rather than rely on what some man wrote in some book, you would understand that.
Yawn. Get a real argument. The Bible is what God gave to mankind; the KJV is a product of the Anglican Church.
Did you select that quote because you thought that I wouldn't have the proof to back up what I stated? You are in no postition to say my remarks are irrelevant. You are only parroting what you have heard or read in some book.
Says the guy parroting what he may have heard or read in some book.
I can post links to multiple threads of other boards where other people, that are proven heretics, do the very same thing, citing the same sources that you do, including James White's book.. Like I said, this ain't my frist rodeo. If you think that you are in a position to say that my remarks are irrelevant, then you should back up your accusations with evidence to prove me wrong
First demonstrate that the statement I called "irrelevant" was actually relevant to Mustapha's post, to which you were replying.
but not with copy and paste from Jame's White's book. Unlike you, I can prove my position, as I declared the intentions of in the post that you selectively quoted from.
Again, you sound like you're about twelve.
Did you bother to even have a look at the evidence that I had already posted on the linked thread? There's a lot more that goes with that.