Christ is God
- Thread starter posthuman
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
1. Catholics admit that this part was inserted circa 130-140 AD. As the matter of fact, Peter says to be baptized in the name of Jesus. All clear baptisms on record are in the name of Jesus Christr.
Let me point you to the scholars:
"The disputed part is found in no uncial Greek manuscripts and in only four rather recent cursives - one of the fifteenth and three of the sixteenth century. No Greek epistolary manuscript contains the passage".
Well, we know about the third wave of reformation taking pace and Catholics had to "produce" proof of their nonbiblical theology.
You are aware about Ac 2:22, aren't you Nehemiah6 ?
So God did His work through/by Jesus. God manifested His love, power and authority through/by Jesus.
Please show an OT verse stating that Jesus is the Word. How many times I have to repeat that John had referred to the prophets like Isa 55:11, Ps 33:6+9 and specifically to 2Sam 7:12?
Let me point you to the scholars:
"The disputed part is found in no uncial Greek manuscripts and in only four rather recent cursives - one of the fifteenth and three of the sixteenth century. No Greek epistolary manuscript contains the passage".
Well, we know about the third wave of reformation taking pace and Catholics had to "produce" proof of their nonbiblical theology.
You are aware about Ac 2:22, aren't you Nehemiah6 ?
So God did His work through/by Jesus. God manifested His love, power and authority through/by Jesus.
Please show an OT verse stating that Jesus is the Word. How many times I have to repeat that John had referred to the prophets like Isa 55:11, Ps 33:6+9 and specifically to 2Sam 7:12?
Are you just trying to muddy the waters, or are you simply confused?
So let's keep it simple:
QUESTION: IS JESUS OF NAZARETH TRULY AND FULLY GOD?
ANSWER FROM BIBLE-BELIEVING CHRISTIANS: ABSOLUTELY
ANSWER FROM CULTISTS AND FALSE RELIGIONISTS: ABSOLUTELY NOT
So where do you stand? There is no middle ground.
So let's keep it simple:
QUESTION: IS JESUS OF NAZARETH TRULY AND FULLY GOD?
ANSWER FROM BIBLE-BELIEVING CHRISTIANS: ABSOLUTELY
ANSWER FROM CULTISTS AND FALSE RELIGIONISTS: ABSOLUTELY NOT
So where do you stand? There is no middle ground.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
I have heard (in public forums here) that BL was a professing satanist, someone wrote that in her thread. I did not have time or energy to check this, and brother had no reason to lie. Anyway, if this is true, I've seen satanists do it before, pose as many different persons to troll Christians. Of course they love to pose as Christians and infiltrate. I had a very bad experience myself being stalked on YouTube about a decade ago. Many channels that posed as Christians were actually one satanist and her husband and they admitted to it on FB; this was back when YouTube had friends lists. I was a babe in Christ and much more naive. I don't know what's up with all these newcomers piling up out of nowhere just to deny that Christ is God, but it's definitely a possibility. Be careful everyone.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Your very clear verses?
So could you, please explain why your "clear" verses contradict hundreds of never disputed clear verses?
Shouldn't we begin from such verses instead of trying to support man-made theologies (clearly documented even by those whose earlier authorities omitted the crimes) by manipulated/added/ explained verses?
So could you, please explain why your "clear" verses contradict hundreds of never disputed clear verses?
Shouldn't we begin from such verses instead of trying to support man-made theologies (clearly documented even by those whose earlier authorities omitted the crimes) by manipulated/added/ explained verses?
1 John 1 -
1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our own eyes, which we have gazed upon and touched with our own hands [G5584--same word as in Luke 24:39 "handle Me and see"]—this is the Word of life. 2 And this is the life that was revealed; we have seen it and testified to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life that was with the Father and was revealed to us.
1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our own eyes, which we have gazed upon and touched with our own hands [G5584--same word as in Luke 24:39 "handle Me and see"]—this is the Word of life. 2 And this is the life that was revealed; we have seen it and testified to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life that was with the Father and was revealed to us.
Jesus (as well as the NT writers) also said that the Father is the only true God like in Jn 17:3, 20:17, 1Cor 8:6 and hundreds more.
Did they lie?
No,neither Jesus nor the NT writers lied.
Were those statements revoked?
No, they weren't.
So we know from Jn 12:47-50 what rejecting Jesus' word really means, don't we?
Did they lie?
No,neither Jesus nor the NT writers lied.
Were those statements revoked?
No, they weren't.
So we know from Jn 12:47-50 what rejecting Jesus' word really means, don't we?