Catholicism vs Protestantism

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,371
113
The link you gave doesn't say Peter was in Rome from 32 AD. It says he was Pope from 32 AD.
My brother, if Peter was pope from 32, where he at?

You mean he was Pope some where and move to Rome in AD 42?

Nothing in the Bible
 
Aug 14, 2019
1,374
307
83
Ok brother, my question is why bible writer not write how Peter die?

If that is urgent don't you think Holy Spirit not ask Bible writer to write it?
Well Jackson, the focus of scripture is Jesus. Peter is one of the authors and when he was martyr he told them to turn his cross upside down feeling unworthy for his death to look like Christ's.

To sum up, the scriptures are about Christ not Paul or Peter.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
(y)(y):rolleyes:(y)
:rolleyes::rolleyes:(y)(y):sneaky:(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y):rolleyes::sneaky::sneaky::rolleyes::sneaky::sneaky:(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y):sneaky::sneaky:(y):sneaky::sneaky:(y):sneaky:(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)(y)

Did that expression of the Word end on earth?

At least not under the Sun. No.

I would say the living word still abides in mankind .But God is no longer bringing new prophecies. The witness of his word is complete .There are no loving laws missing by which we could know Him more adequately. We have the perfect (face to face)

The effects are innumerable multiplying . By it we try the spirits to see if of men seen(oral traditions) or of God not seen .If any man later that John on the island of Patmos say "Lo is Christ" we are commanded not to believe. He warned us before the closing of new prophecy

The easy way yoked with Christ to separate. false prophets as false apostles .

Just use the year of the last revelation of prophecy .Within a fifty year period

No Jehovah witnesses, no Mormons, no Mohamed's, no eastern religions etc/. One true prophet the living abiding word of God.
 
B

Bede

Guest
I believe Christian historian Luke who wrote tha book of act
Act 28 when Oaul in Rome he invite Jews and preach there for 2 years

Rome 15
20 Yea, so have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man's foundation:

He don't want preach to Rome church if Peter start that church

You change the word preach into build the church.

And letter of Rome is a preaching
I didn't change anything. Paul says he has preached the gospel
"from Jerusalem and as far round as Illyricum I have fully preached the gospel of Christ, thus making it my ambition to preach the gospel, not where Christ has already been named, lest I build on another man’s foundation"
It his ambition not an utterly fixed rule.
Then he goes onto explain "This is the reason why I have so often been hindered from coming to you." In other words he has been stopped from coming because then he would have been building on another man's foundation. Thus it proves that another apostle (i.e Peter) was there first. And then he says "But now, since I no longer have any room for work in these regions, and since I have longed for many years to come to you, I hope to see you in passing as I go to Spain, and to be sped on my journey there by you, once I have enjoyed your company for a little." In other words he is not intending to preach the gospel to them but just pop in for a social visit on his way to Spain.


Act 28

30 And Paul dwelt two whole years in his own hired house, and received all that came in unto him,
31 Preaching the kingdom of God, and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ, with all confidence, no man forbidding him.

Paul preaching 2 years in Rome, it prove he/Paul start that church

Let build deductive logic

Paul not preach to the church build by other

Paul preach In Rome for 2 years

Therefore Church of Rome start by Paul, not Peter
No it wasn't started by Paul. It was started long before Paul got there as I have shown you..
Paul finally preached the gospel in Rome because he was under house arrest for 2 years. He wasn't going to sit around twiddling his thumbs for 2 years doing nothing.
 
B

Bede

Guest
I see what you're saying.

at the same time, if
Roman Church isn't a negative term, and
Catholic Church isn't a negative term,
then it doesn't seem to me like
Roman Catholic Church
should be a negative term, although it might demonstrate a misunderstanding of Catholic teaching.
Apples and Pears

Roman Church is referring to a particular church (congregation) in Rome.
Catholic Church is referring to the whole worldwide Church that includes not only Latin (Roman) rite Catholics but Syro-Malabar, Syriac. Maronite Catholics plus the other 20 rites.

Why cannot you just call the Catholic Church by the name that the Catholic Church calls itself.
It is both correct and respectful.
 
B

Bede

Guest
right! people weren't reading the Bible for themselves, and they might not have been able to understand Latin.

so the idea of God revealing his truth to individual people as they read the Bible for themselves wasn't really possible until the printing press and most people learning how to read.
A few points.

1. For affordable mass produced Bibles you need not only the printing press but cheap mass produced paper. The first commercially successful paper mill in England was built by John Spilman in Dartford in 1588.

2. It is true that until relatively recently the Mass prayers said by the priest were un Latin, the readings from the Bible were given in English (or whatever the local language was).

3. It is a myth that the Catholic Church kept the Bible from people by only allowing it in Latin. Venacular versions were available from very early. And don't forget in the first few centuries Latin was a common language in the West, just as Greek was in the East.
 
B

Bede

Guest
My brother, if Peter was pope from 32, where he at?

You mean he was Pope some where and move to Rome in AD 42?

Nothing in the Bible
Nothing in the Bible about Peter?
You have a lot missing in your Bible.
Get a full one.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
They not truly worshiping the Lord.
exactly!
I don't think that as a group Samaritans, Jews, or Muslims are truly worshipping God.

19“Sir,” the woman said, “you must be a prophet. 20So tell me, why is it that you Jews insist that Jerusalem is the only place of worship, while we Samaritans claim it is here at Mount Gerizim,c where our ancestors worshiped?”

21Jesus replied, “Believe me, dear woman, the time is coming when it will no longer matter whether you worship the Father on this mountain or in Jerusalem. 22You Samaritans know very little about the one you worship, while we Jews know all about him, for salvation comes through the Jews. 23But the time is coming—indeed it’s here now—when true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth. The Father is looking for those who will worship him that way. 24For God is Spirit, so those who worship him must worship in spirit and in truth.”
https://biblehub.com/nlt/john/4.htm

it all falls into place.
unless, a person has to engage in black and white, all-or-nothing thinking.

if a person does wish to engage in all-or-nothing thinking, I believe they will have difficulty with certain Bible passages, for example 2nd Kings 17.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
Well Jackson, the focus of scripture is Jesus. Peter is one of the authors and when he was martyr he told them to turn his cross upside down feeling unworthy for his death to look like Christ's.

To sum up, the scriptures are about Christ not Paul or Peter.
I like how John the Baptist puts it

John 3:30 He must increase, but I must decrease.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
We have the perfect (face to face)
do you believe this has already been fulfilled?
1 Corinthians 13:12 For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part, but then I will know fully, even as I was also fully known.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
Apples and Pears

Roman Church is referring to a particular church (congregation) in Rome.
Catholic Church is referring to the whole worldwide Church that includes not only Latin (Roman) rite Catholics but Syro-Malabar, Syriac. Maronite Catholics plus the other 20 rites.

Why cannot you just call the Catholic Church by the name that the Catholic Church calls itself.
It is both correct and respectful.
I'm fine with using the name "Catholic Church".
at the same time, since the Catholic church is headquartered in Rome, I don't see that it is a negative thing to add Roman in front of Catholic Church.

I did an image search for "Roman Catholic Church sign".
found loads of examples, like
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3717054/posts
And

http://www.cityofmiramarflorida.com/2010/06/blessed-john-xxiii-roman-catholic.html?m=1

I don't think Roman is in itself a negative term, though I'm sure it has been used with that intent.
Mexican is not a negative term in itself, though I definitely have heard it used that way.
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,371
113
Why would you think Peter would have a problem giving Paul freedom to do as He pleases? That Paul had something to add there I have no doubt.
Paul not Peter that say, he don't want to preach to the church founded by other.
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,371
113
Well Jackson, the focus of scripture is Jesus. Peter is one of the authors and when he was martyr he told them to turn his cross upside down feeling unworthy for his death to look like Christ's.

To sum up, the scriptures are about Christ not Paul or Peter.
That according to catholic history but I don't believe it.

Read this link brother

http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/peters-jerusalem-tomb.htm

Peter tomb in jerusalem
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
Apples and Pears

Roman Church is referring to a particular church (congregation) in Rome.
Catholic Church is referring to the whole worldwide Church that includes not only Latin (Roman) rite Catholics but Syro-Malabar, Syriac. Maronite Catholics plus the other 20 rites.

Why cannot you just call the Catholic Church by the name that the Catholic Church calls itself.
It is both correct and respectful.
did some research that might be of interest

found this page
https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=1357

it seems to be an article from
The Catholic University of America Press

"The second way in which the basic teaching that the Roman Catholic Church is the one and only kingdom of God on earth according to the dispensation of the New Testament has been denied in our era has been through the tactic of implying that, in one way or another, the Roman Catholic Church was not exactly identical with the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ, or with the Communion of Saints, or with the Kingdom or the City of God."

this publication seems to be intended for scholars, and that is one long sentence!
but if I'm reading it right, the article in general and that sentence in particular relates to things we've been talking about.
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,371
113
if a person does wish to engage in all-or-nothing thinking, I believe they will have difficulty with certain Bible passages, for example 2nd Kings 17.
To my knowledge all or nothing thinking is the way depress person think, what this way of thinking have to do with interprate the Bible?
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,371
113
Then he goes onto explain "This is the reason why I have so often been hindered from coming to you." In other words he has been stopped from coming because then he would have been building on another man's foundation. Thus it proves that another apostle (i.e Peter) w
You add Peter here brother
No it wasn't started by Paul.
And you believe it start by Peter, Peter is the apostle president, why act 28 not mention about Peter make welcoming party when Paul arrived there, while you read in Paul,journey to Rome every time he arrived to a town where there is Christian, they welcomm him, they love each other.
 

maryjohanna

Active member
May 24, 2020
106
75
28
hi maryjohanna!

I hear what you're saying.

there are some Catholic practices that I find troubling, though in some cases things I previously thought unbiblical I now see as not as clear-cut as before.

the Nicene Creed is often recited during Mass.

"I/We believe...
in one Lord, Jesus Christ...
On the third day he rose again..."

of course, if a person doesn't honestly believe those things, they shouldn't say that they do!
Thank you for your reply. When I would go to mass when I was younger because of family, I would always feel weird about the Nicene Creed. I am just sharing what my heart's instinct is, and someone may feel completely different which is okay. But, I always felt like the Nicene Creed and other prayers said during mass just sounded so empty and almost lifeless. It always seemed like people were saying it just to say it; they weren't saying it because they believed what it was saying in their hearts. The statement "we believe in one holy catholic and apostolic church" always bothered me; we aren't called to follow a church, we are called to follow Jesus. Plain and simple.

I worry because I think a LOT of people say the Creed, go to mass, and list off a set of prayers as a part of the Catholic "tradition" and think that is enough for them and it is not. I ALWAYS think of what Christ told us in the Gospels regarding those who are will make it into the Kingdom:

"Not everyone who says to me 'Lord, Lord' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many might works in your name'? And then I will declare to them, 'I never KNEW you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness." [Matthew 7:21-23]

WOW! This passage has always stuck with me. It has the fear of God infused in it. I am not trying to categorize a group of people, but this [to me] applies to the situation I am talking about. People think they can just say what is "required" and "put in place" by the authority of the church and they assume that it will produce good fruit and save them. It won't. And it scares me for people. Now, there very well could be people who recite this prayer and genuinely believe the meaning. What this means, I cannot judge or say.

I can say though that God wants to KNOW us. He wants to KNOW the deepest part of hearts and our souls. Matthew 6:7 warns us not to "heap up empty phrases" when we pray and those who do think they will be heard for their MANY words... but they won't. Again, I am not judging the hearts of a Catholic who recites this prayer; HOWEVER, I think that the Nicene Creed is only one example of many things [pertaining to Catholicism] that has conditioned people to think that is what faith is meant to consist of, and I just don't agree.

God bless!
 

Nebuchadnezzer

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2019
1,134
205
63
do you mean that the Pope influences our behavior in the same way that our fleshly nature influences our behavior?
Satan controls his children.
Satan controls the Pope. Pope is father over Satans chil
Until you are saved you are in a false christianity under the pope.
do you mean that the Pope influences our behavior in the same way that our fleshly nature influences our behavior?
The Pope and his priests apply to the mark of the beast to all who are not saved.