There's far too much here to get into, and I have no interest in a spat that goes quite as theologically deep as is required for such a disagreement. Essentially, though, you're camping on a handful of verses and neglecting the bulk of the witness of Scripture. It can be said to be a past event, but salvation is presented throughout Scripture as something that has an ongoing component not simply a once-and-done matter.
In other words you have no desire to discuss the most important topic in scripture. But your Ok to discuss Something you believe in
I guess this says it all
I do have a question though if you do not want to discuss. Why are you in a thread where that is the main topic?
as for as you think most of the bible says otherwise. Well you said you have no desire to discuss it. Or the passage I brought up. So I guess it’s a mute point
[quote-]As for James, the whole reason I bring it up is specifically to highlight that those who place a division between works and saving faith are not presenting a Biblical picture of saving faith. There is no separation, no faith without works. There's no need to get into a number because the whole point is to demonstrate a dimension of faith that many explicitly deny. OSAS proponents set Paul against James and then try to stifle James by speaking of context issues they never define so we can't talk about if they actually are there or not.[/QUOTE]
You do not get it. The people in here who are using it say James is saying we can lose salvation. Nothing in the text states this. So you you keep bringing it up. All we can do is assume your just like them