Living peaceably with everyone is indeed loving, and there is no work required.If you think you can show love without doing works that'd be a neat trick.
Living peaceably with everyone is indeed loving, and there is no work required.If you think you can show love without doing works that'd be a neat trick.
Christian not living a lifestyle of sin is legit so I agree with them about that. But we do fall short, yep. If sinless perfectionism was true what was that Paul saying I do what I want not, are they better than the apostles.We all sin Soul Weaver
That is a straw man argument they use.
Through your wit You said I was a big fan of specks and planks.
you are smart
Hmm.... Guess we should have NO rules here at all? Would it be ok to throw F-bombs and threaten people too?
Cause you obviously think calling some a child of the devil is just fine.
"Jesus preached perseverance of the Saints; Philippians 1:6; that all his will never lose salvation"
Here's the verse in context:
3 I thank my God in all my remembrance of you, 4 always in every prayer of mine for you all making my prayer with joy, 5 because of your partnership in the gospel from the first day until now. 6 And I am sure of this, that he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ. 7 It is right for me to feel this way about you all, because I hold you in my heart, for you are all partakers with me of grace, both in my imprisonment and in the defense and confirmation of the gospel. 8 For God is my witness, how I yearn for you all with the affection of Christ Jesus. 9 And it is my prayer that your love may abound more and more, with knowledge and all discernment, 10 so that you may approve what is excellent, and so be pure and blameless for the day of Christ, 11 filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ, to the glory and praise of God.
If we can take this quote from Paul's greetings to the Philippians as a proof text of OSAS than nothing is safe. Grabbing a generality from a prayer and labeling it as an all-encompassing definitive is a sign of weak theology. It's a hospitable greeting used by Paul to follow Christians not a dogmatic decree.
Don't put yourself down mate.thanks for thinking i am witty
far from it, tho - the consensus of polled opinion is that my attempts at humor are usually pretty pathetic.
it was a serious comment tho -- it just happens that more often than not whenever i see you commenting it's having to do with calling this thing evil or that thing evil, this person wicked, etc. specks and planks.
as i've been telling you for several years - i think it is wiser to speak about Christ, about goodness, about things we may rejoice in and give thanks over, about His great mercies and power.
thanks for that, too.
although the truth of the matter is that i am an idiot.
What does theopneustos mean?What Paul spoke was theopneustos, it wasn't merely a hospitable greeting, but divine truth.
You shouldn't be so quick to disregard the word in perhaps a bias against OSAS.
Notice also it is Christ who brings this work to completion in his people, not they themselves. Here is John Gill on this matter concerning the text:
"Wherefore by it is undoubtedly meant the work of grace upon their hearts, sometimes called the work of faith, because that is a principal part of it: this is God's work, and not man's, as may be concluded from the nature of the work itself, which is the transforming of a man by the reviewing of him, a regeneration, a resurrection, and a creation, and therefore requires almighty power; and from the condition man is in by nature, he is dead in sin, and has no power to act spiritually, and much less what is equal to such a work as this; he has no will, desire, and inclination to it, but all the reverse; and if he had, he could no more effect it, than the dry bones in Ezekiel's vision could cause themselves to live. This is the work of God."
Compare this text with Philippians 2:11-13 and we see the same truth expanded. This is also witnessed in Hebrews 12:2, and expresses the same truth. Ezekiel 36:27 also expresses this same truth which Scripture Paul knew, and was totally aware of.
You probably need to read some more Bible, compare passages that are similar, and implement 2 Timothy 2:15 because this truth is expressed all over its precious pages to Soli Deo Gloria.
To take your error to its logical end, using the verse in context since it is Christ accomplishing this in them, Christ will then not finish what he began.
God breathed; 2 Timothy 3:16.What does theopneustos mean?
Christian not living a lifestyle of sin is legit so I agree with them about that. But we do fall short, yep. If sinless perfectionism was true what was that Paul saying I do what I want not, are they better than the apostles.
Living peaceably with everyone is indeed loving, and there is no work required.
YeshI do not think belittling,name calling, anger or agression belong in the vocabulary or life of a believer.
we alone are responsible for the words we speak!
let the words of my mouth and the meditation my heart be acceptable in thy sight O Lord Psalms 19:14
The only way to live peaceably with everyone without work is to die. Otherwise it takes the work of understanding their position among other things that take effort. Permissiveness is not loving, especially if it is allowing others to go peacefully to their own destruction.
No, it's not blasphemy to say God has no further obligation to complete a work in the person who has abandoned Him in unbelief.
Where are called to coddle/live peaceably with false teachings that go against the very essence, fundamental doctrines of the Gospel.
Love exists inside of truth not the other way around.
And what doctrines would those be? That God will judge the ungodly?
I'm happy you agree that Jesus meant what He said when He said, "Go and sin no more". So, if OSAS is correct, then why bother us with all the warnings and admonitions, if in the end, Jesus is gonna just flip a switch in our brain on Judgment Day and make us hate all the pride, booze, porn, etc. we just could not resist indulging the day before?
Actually, I focus on believing.You focus on sin
If that's what you're teaching, than it seems to me to be a misreading.
We are saved by the obedience of faith. The two are inseperable Abraham's faith was in his obedience to God's commands, Moses' faith was in obedience to God's leading, David's faith was in obedience to God's judgment. Faith is not simply acceptance of a set of facts, otherwise demons would be saved. It's not even doing what God commands, otherwise Balaam would be righteous. You're imposing a modern definition of faith onto the text and if that's the faith you have it's not the faith that justifies.
What's so arrogant about being able to see how useless and illogical the argument is that you can only know what is permanent about salvation on the day you die?Calling OSAS a stupid doctrine makes you sound arrogant.
What I know is a person can't possibly know what is permanent in a person's life until they die. And yet your osas uses permanence as the measure of whether someone is saved or not. That's worthless doctrine. How does that help anybody?No contradiction at all and you don’t know what permanent means?
I agree.There is nothing stupid about God’s preservation.