When will the restoration of the Kingdom be?Almost all prophesies point to the physical restoration of Israel’s kingdom. The truth of the cross was a mystery.
When will the restoration of the Kingdom be?Almost all prophesies point to the physical restoration of Israel’s kingdom. The truth of the cross was a mystery.
That’s not addressing the confusion aspect. In fact it’s give more confusion.Even after resurrection, shortly before the Lord’s ascension, the disciples were still looking for the kingdom to be restored.
Acts 1
6 When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?
7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.
When will the restoration of the Kingdom be?
That’s not addressing the confusion aspect. In fact it’s give more confusion.
So Jesus was speaking of a spiritual Kingdom. Of course we agree on that. Again I would like to ask that if a man is born a Jew, but becomes a believer, would he be with Christ? If not, how could he go to Sheol if there are no more Levitical sacrifices? How is atonement made?At the second coming of Jesus as King of Kings. He will rule the earth with a rod of iron and Israel will be able to worship the Lord without fear of their enemies.
That didn’t include grace?What it proves is that disciples were looking for and preaching about this kingdom during the days of Jesus.
So Jesus was speaking of a spiritual Kingdom. Of course we agree on that. Again I would like to ask that if a man is born a Jew, but becomes a believer, would he be with Christ? If not, how could he go to Sheol if there are no more Levitical sacrifices? How is atonement made?
That didn’t include grace?
Now what about if he wasn’t? Where is the atonement?Now? In the Church age? He would no longer be a Jew but part of the body of Christ. He would be with the Lord upon death or at the gathering.
Would it be your contention that only after Jesus died and resurrected salvation was offered?Grace for what? It was not concerning eternal salvation, but a physical deliverance from their enemies. I guess that could be considered grace.
Now what about if he wasn’t? Where is the atonement?
Would it be your contention that only after Jesus died and resurrected salvation was offered?
So the Physical Kingdom will only be for JewishIn the Church age? He would be condemned just like an unbelieving Gentile.
How was the thief saved? When he asked Jesus to remember him when He entered Kingdom(Jesus hadn’t died yet) was that because of belief in the Kingdom or who he believed Jesus was?Eternal salvation given by grace, yes.
I think we both agree on that.In the Church age? He would be condemned just like an unbelieving Gentile.
So the Physical Kingdom will only be for Jewish
How was the thief saved? When he asked Jesus to remember him when He entered Kingdom(Jesus hadn’t died yet) was that because of belief in the Kingdom or who he believed Jesus was?
Right, but eventually he will be in Heaven. So would it be apperent that Jesus was offering grace prior to the His death and resurrection?Simply by asking Jesus to remember him. The thief did not go to heaven when he died, but to paradise, Abraham’s bosom.
Right, but eventually he will be in Heaven. So would it be apperent that Jesus was offering grace prior to the His death and resurrection?
14And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come. - Matthew 24:14Did you ever compare Matthew 24:14 with Colossians 1:5-6?
He is still faithful to us even if we are faithless to him.
12if we endure,
we will also reign with Him;
if we deny Him,
He will also deny us;
13if we are faithless,
He remains faithful,
for He cannot deny Himself.
2 Timothy 2:12-13
What you are ignoring is there has to be a difference between 'being faithless' and 'denying him'.
He will deny you if you deny him. But he will not deny you if you are faithless.
That tells you right there that denying him and being faithless aren't the same thing.
Follow this closely:
How can Paul say 'denying him' means not being able to reign with him, and then turn right around and say Christ can not deny us?
The question you need to answer is, how can Paul say in vs. 12 that Christ will deny us, but then turn right around and say in vs. 13 that He cannot deny Himself (us, his body)? My interpretation of the passage easily explains that. I don't think you're does. But show me how your interpretation of the passage explains it. I say your doctrine puts vs. 12 and 13 in direct contradiction with each other. Mine doesn't.If we endure what? This endurance of suffering earns the believer’s right to reign with Him. That’s the context of verse 12.
If we believe not, it doesn’t make us not in Christ. Christ cannot deny those who are in Him.
14And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come. - Matthew 24:14
5the faith and love that spring from the hope stored up for you in heaven and about which you have already heard in the true message of the gospel 6that has come to you. In the same way, the gospel is bearing fruit and growing throughout the whole world—just as it has been doing among you since the day you heard it and truly understood God’s grace. - Colossians 1:5-6
I highlighted some key phrases. Take it from here.