Easy.So which things of Jesus’s teaching should we as Gentiles accept and not accepted according to this?
You reject the things that don't line up with your doctrine.
Easy.So which things of Jesus’s teaching should we as Gentiles accept and not accepted according to this?
Thank you! So most these guys were of a reformed theology and dispensationalism. Why didn’t you just say you are of that?James Knox
Sam Gipp
James Modlish
Andrew Sluder
Thank you! So most these guys were of a reformed theology and dispensationalism. Why didn’t you just say you are of that?
Easy.
You reject the things that don't line up with your doctrine.
Is not the gospel that Paul taught, how Christ died for our sins, was buried and resurrected on the third day? Did the disciples understand this message before the cross?
John MacArthur gave the best response in my opinion with regards to the position of dispensationalism as it stands now. I can give the link. As for my own view, I do not believe there are two different forms of salvation for Jews and Gentiles. Scripture in no way indicates that.The opposite of reformed theology. That’s heresy in my book.
They are KJV only, dispensation believing and rightly dividing preachers.
So Les Feldick taught a reformed theology. Why was he right and 2000 years of church history and teaching are wrong?
It depends. Which part of the Bible is being reformed and why. I will tell you that I don’t in anyway give credence with dispensationalismThe term reformed means different things to different people. How do you define that term for yourself?
It depends. Which part of the Bible is being reformed and why. I will tell you that I don’t in anyway give credence with dispensationalism
It depends. Which part of the Bible is being reformed and why. I will tell you that I don’t in anyway give credence with dispensationalism
Yes.Lol, do you turn the other cheek
Yes.or do you believe in self defense?
In the long run, yes.Is your salvation at stake for calling someone a fool?
I would have to know more about him before I can give an honesty answer.Are you talking about reformed as in reformed baptist, or TULIP?
If so, then Les Feldick is definitely not reformed.
I will not beat this dead horse with you....we have had this dance...JESUS was clear....in the VOLUME of the book it is written of ME and search the scriptures, they are they which TESTIFY OF MEN....and he went ON to rake Nicodemus over the coals for being a MASTER and NOT understanding the discourse of JOHN chapter three.....
David speaks to grace and mercy, JOB understood the resurrection and even EVE/Abel comprehended the context of GENESIS 3:15......
Take it up with GOD......the bible is clear.....the OT is full of pictures, types and paintings of what would happen in the NEW and JESUS proves this by his word to Nicodemus.....
HOW IS IT that you being a MASTER do NO understand these THINGS.....
I would have to know more about him before I can give an honesty answer.
Agreed.I do not believe there are two different forms of salvation for Jews and Gentiles. Scripture in no way indicates that.
Yes.
Yes.
In the long run, yes.
Yes.
Yes.
In the long run, yes.
John MacArthur gave the best response in my opinion with regards to the position of dispensationalism as it stands now. I can give the link. As for my own view, I do not believe there are two different forms of salvation for Jews and Gentiles. Scripture in no way indicates that.
Reformed by definition means to change something for the better. There are a lot of reformed denominations.But I am asking you what do you understand for yourself, the term reformed? What does that term means to you?
John MacArthur gave the best response in my opinion with regards to the position of dispensationalism as it stands now. I can give the link. As for my own view, I do not believe there are two different forms of salvation for Jews and Gentiles. Scripture in no way indicates that.