That is what is being referred to. You did say that...
"The scriptures say what they say. I can't save myself, but I can "turn to the Word of God which became Flesh" and He has promised that "everyone" who "denies themselves", and "follows" Him is worthy of His Saving Grace. Those who expect the Christ to do everything for them, well that isn't covered by Him.
You might be able be saved by following another path, but I believe we should "do" as He said to "do"."
I guess people only SEE what they want to see.
You might find a dinosaur living in Cuba,
but I believe you won't. You might be able to jump over the moon,
but I believe you can't.
You might be able to create your own High Days,
but I believe it is wrong to even try. You might find another Path to eternity than the one the Christ Walked,
BUT I BELIEVE you won't.
This is actually a perfect example of what religious men do to God's Word all the time, and it is also what the serpent did to Eve. It seems they look over the scriptures, then they pick out a word or a sentence that can be used to further or justify some religion or religious tradition, or in this case, some vendetta, and they "omit" the parts that don't support their agenda. And in doing so, they distort and corrupt the point of the Scriptures, just as anyone can see Decon distorted and corrupted my stated belief. This is what the Mainstream Preachers of Christ's time did.
Matt. 23:
23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin,
and have omitted the weightier matters of the law,
judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and
not to leave the other undone.
But As anyone really interested in truth can see, I do not preach there is another Path, my post doesn't even suggest it. Only by isolating a few word's and "omitting" the rest can the argument even be made.
John 6:
54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
So the argument could be made that the Christ was promoting cannibalism. And there might even be some who would say "He did say this", and of a truth He did. But this one sentence doesn't not promote eating the flesh of humans does it? Only by NOT omitting the rest of His Word's can we come to a full understanding of what He meant.
I appreciate you pointing out this post as this circumstance illustrates the importance of honest discussion, and seeking, not to justify existing religious traditions or beliefs, but to understand the Will of God, without which there is no Kingdom of Heaven..