You two geniuses are so much smarter than the theologians that have worked on eschatology for centuries and came up with 4 different views of it. You are so much smarter than those men. AMAZING!!!! You never rebuted those two sites I pointed you to. Did you bother to even look at them? It seems to me that you don't want to learn what theologians whose job is to study the Bible and make decisions about what it means. To me all you did is ignore them and keep on posting how smarter you are than theologians that study the scripture. I hate to say this but you two sound as dogmatic as Jim Jones!!
Methinks your egos are getting in the way!!!
Endoscopy, they're only men! If you have four different views, they cannot all be Biblical. Regarding those sites, as I told you in an earlier post, I have the book of the four views and I've gone over these views more times than I can count. Since they can't all be correct, then we must cross-reference and compare scripture to weed out those views as to why they are incorrect. Also, it is not a matter of being "smarter" but what the Spirit reveals.
As I said in a previous post, give me a conflicting issue regarding end-time events and I will provide scripture as to why that view is wrong.
As I gave in a previous example, the historic view interprets end-time events as finding fulfillment in past historical events beginning with the first century. Yet, Jesus, in presenting the signs leading up to his return to end the age makes it clear that these events take place in the last generation, a generation scripturally being no longer than 100 years and most likely being closer to 70 years. So right off the bat the historical view has a major problem.
Give us some popular controversial issues regarding these views and we can discuss them.