H
I am personally undecided on this issue but I think there are quite a few verses that can be reasonably interpreted as applying to a pre-trib rapture event. You just quoted one yourself about us not being appointed for God's wrath. That on it's own is not enough I understand. I don't think it is necessary for The Lord to evacuate us in order to protect us and I have scriptural grounds for that.
But it's a stretch to claim there aren't ANY scriptural reasons for a pre-trib position. What you would have to do is demonstrate why certain verses are NOT indicative of a pre-trib rapture. Luke 21:36 for one example. What is Jesus meaning there?
Ok,we all believe Jesus returns post trib. we all believe that.If you sow to the flesh, you will reap corruption of that flesh, i promise you God does not lie. You fornicating, you looking at porn, you lusting, you commiting adultery, how will you escape punishment, you will reap what you have sown. Many will suffer in the flesh when Tribulation starts, therefore remember my words to you, and realize that you deserve it for sowing to the flesh, stay strong in the Faith, endure to the end, and please get rid of the false doctrine that many false prophets are teaching behind the pulpits about pre-trib or post-trib. Jesus plainly said and taught when you see great tribulation such as never has been nor ever will be again, then start looking for Him, because He will be coming AFTER that great tribulation. This is what Scripture plainly teach, but false doctrines have blinded this generation of the TRUTH. Lo, i have told you the TRUTH.
^i^
††† In His Holy and Precious Name, Jesus Christ †††
DiscipleDave
Well, just tell us your marvelous news.
First of all the Second Coming of Jesus and the Rapture are two separate events. Jesus' second coming will come in the twinkling of an eye. The Rapture is not so.
The Rapture is a 3 day event. As the Sun passes over at 12 noon on parts of the Earth at those time zones these events will occur in full view of all mankind and undeniable.
Everyone living 25 years and down who believe on Jesus Christ, will Transfigure in full view of mankind and ascend to Heaven. This includes those 25 year olds and on down who came to believe because of the previous day of the dead arising in Christ.
The unborn children in their mothers wombs will also Transfigure and no children will be conceived to men for the duration of the Tribulation Period.
There it is, rip at it all you want. It does me no harm because I am anonymous and will remain the same. Would you like to know the year and the season? Would you like to know the exact day of the sign in the sky of Revelation chapter 12 which is the Mid Trib marker of the last 3 and 1\2 years of the Tribulation Period?
Amazing how 2 posters on this site ignore the 4 Biblical versions of eschatology that theologians for centuries have worked with and can't find a way to remove any of them. These posters don't bother to look at them and refute them but just make pronouncements from their own reading of the Bible. They are right and the world of theologians is wrong. Pure egotistical thinking.
ROFLI've already studied them for many years prior to your post and continue to study end-time events. There is only one view that is Biblically correct, with the others are misapplied, misinterpreted, historicized, preterized and amillennialized.
Everything from Revelation chapter four onward is future, as it is the "what must take place later" part of what John was told to write and which takes place after the "what is now," i.e. the church period, which we are still in. Once the church has been completed, then the Lord will appear and gather the church bringing and end to the "what is now" with the "what must take place after this" to follow.
ROFL
Words not rebuttal. Where is your PROOF from scripture. Demonstrate where each goes wrong. The huge issue in eschatology is correctly defining the symbolism in Daniel and Revelation. Therefore you must have cracked the meaning of the symbology where others failed. Give us the meaning behind a couple of those symbols demonstrating where the others failed.
ROFL
Words not rebuttal. Where is your PROOF from scripture. Demonstrate where each goes wrong. The huge issue in eschatology is correctly defining the symbolism in Daniel and Revelation. Therefore you must have cracked the meaning of the symbology where others failed. Give us the meaning behind a couple of those symbols demonstrating where the others failed.
Look if you have a Bible and keep studying with the guidance of The Holy Spirit you'll understand Revelation more and more, the Revelation symbolism is found in The OT. We don't need a room full of theologians. It's alright to consult teachers from the past but you seem to want to rely only on that for some reason. It's back tracking.ROFL
Words not rebuttal. Where is your PROOF from scripture. Demonstrate where each goes wrong. The huge issue in eschatology is correctly defining the symbolism in Daniel and Revelation. Therefore you must have cracked the meaning of the symbology where others failed. Give us the meaning behind a couple of those symbols demonstrating where the others failed.
I've already studied them for many years prior to your post and continue to study end-time events. There is only one view that is Biblically correct, with the others being misapplied, misinterpreted, historicized, allegorized, preterized and amillennialized.
Everything from Revelation chapter four onward is future, as it is the "what must take place later" part of what John was told to write and which takes place after the "what is now," i.e. the church period, which we are still in. Once the church has been completed, then the Lord will appear and gather the church bringing and end to the "what is now" with the "what must take place after this" to follow.
All issues of the Rapture are solved in that one word "Immanency" All other views fail because they fail the "immanency" test. Once the tribulation starts all other views can be dated and that violates God's word. Case Closed.
All issues of the Rapture are solved in that one word "Immanency" All other views fail because they fail the "immanency" test. Once the tribulation starts all other views can be dated and that violates God's word. Case Closed.
It is quite amazing that people come up with this notion that "everything in Revelation is symbolic", or allegorical, or metaphorical, or even that everything was already fulfilled in the first century. The symbols are generally explained so that we are not left wondering. And the unveiling of future events is generally chronological also, not a bunch of cycles as some claim.There is nothing difficult about "cracking the meaning of symbology" as the meaning to the symbolism in Revelation, for the most part, is provided right in the same book.
Pick something that is symbolic out of Revelation and I will tell you what the literal meaning of it is using scripture. Unless you are unable to do that?
Wow. You have done what theologians have tried to do for centuries. With that in mind tell me why I should believe you. Keep in mind I have heard things like this for 55 years and all proved false. Pick one of the four views and explain how it isn't Biblical.There is nothing difficult about "cracking the meaning of symbology" as the meaning to the symbolism in Revelation, for the most part, is provided right in the same book.
Pick something that is symbolic out of Revelation and I will tell you what the literal meaning of it is using scripture. Unless you are unable to do that?
Since this thread is about the Rapture, and the Rapture is absent from Revelation, not sure why Revelation is even being discussed in this thread.