I believe that Israel has a covenant with God, that God is faithful even if all men are liars, that God brought Israel back after the Holocaust in fulfillment of that covenant and that Jesus did not come to annul the covenant but to fulfill it and that every jot and tittle will be fulfilled and will not pass away. I also believe that your accusation that I am basing this on faulty premises is arrogant.
Believe what you like. Your premises are faulty. The national Israel God had a covenant which ended (reach fulfillment) nearly 2000 years ago. His covenant continues today with us - Christians, the true Jews, circumcised in the heart - through Christ. God didn't bring Israel back "after the Holocaust". That was a planned event by the Rothschilds. Does everything happen by God's permissive will? Yes. But was this event some sort of special miracle like the conquest of Jericho? No. It happened by conspiracy, evil men and terrorism. And there are certainly no legitimate, indisputable ties between the Israelis of today, and the national Israelites of more than 2000 years ago.
I suppose but the sin you will burn in hell for is slandering someone. I never told anyone that God would forgive war crimes. Insinuating that I have is slander. Give me the post where I said that or else repent of this sin.
If the accusation doesn't apply to you, why the offense? I didn't mention your name. A guilty conscience, perhaps? Give me the post where I cursed Israel, else repent of your false accusation against me. If you claim this accusation of yours didn't apply to me because you didn't mention my name, in the same way I claim my post didn't apply to you because I didn't mention yours. You know Jesus hated the hypocrisy of the Pharisees, right?
Finally, my sins, past, present and future, are forgiven through Jesus' shed blood on the cross. When I post, I post with a clear conscience, and don't intend to lie or slander. However, if I do so, I know my sins are forgiven through the Saviour's blood. If you are indeed a brother, any of your sins against me are forgiven in the same way.
What is obvious to me is that I have been appointed a witness of the Lord's salvation, not a judge. I am not here to condemn but to warn and to present the way of salvation. When you judge others you usurp the Lord's position as judge and that is rebellion against the Lord Jesus Christ.
So who was cursing Israel? Or was that a slanderous accusation? Just asking for your sake, because you supposed that I would burn in hell-fire for all eternity for such a sin, and I'd hate for you to be subject to your own justice for committing the very sin you accused others of - if indeed, that's what it was, and I haven't come to a terrible misunderstanding of what you were insinuating...
The Lord Jesus told us "judge not lest you be judged for with what judgement you judge you shall be judged". Everyone who judges Israel of war crimes will be judged with the same judgment. I think it is clear to me that Americans are in no position to be judging others of war crimes. But if you do, then you will be judged with the same judgement that you judge others with.
I've committed no war crimes to be put on trial for. Certainly if I had, I would expect the same judgement against myself. By stating that Israel can't be held to account for war crimes because Jesus said "judge not lest you be judged", you appear to be advocating for a lawless society (or a hypocritical one). That is not what Jesus was saying, the idea is unbiblical given God's severe penalties for sin, and it certainly doesn't work in practice. Do you believe that murderers, rapists, pedophiles and similar criminals should be spared a trial or any legal scrutiny simply by declaring themselves to be Christians - today's Chosen people of God?
You need to now reference all those "justifications of Israeli war crimes" that "I have posted" or else you are guilty of slander. It is a grievous thing to slander a child of God. I will await your speedy response to this slanderous accusation.
I will do this once, but am not going to engage in debate on it, as it is fairly obvious to all fair-minded people. I have chosen 3 which only took a few minutes to find - there are doubtless more examples. I do believe you are more fair-minded than some others, but I also believe my statement to be accurate. I also take the opportunity to point out your hypocrisy - insinuating people hate Jews or curse Israel, simply for criticizing the crimes of the Israeli government.
So on the one hand we have hundreds of thousands of Pro Palestinians around the world chanting "from the river to the Sea" indicating they want a complete annihilation of the Jews from Israel and on the other hand you have three nut jobs in what looks like a classroom singing a song with a similar theme from a Jewish perspective.
How does chanting for Palestine to be free equate with annihilation of the Jews? It does not. Yet accusing the one side of genocide gives the moral ground to the other side to justify its own genocide. Whether you admit it or not, this false statement supports Israeli war crimes.
6. When I was growing up, if someone started a fight with you, then you had the right to end it. Hamas started this and Israel has the right to end it.
No one (except maybe terrorists themselves) deny Israel's right to kill terrorists. This statement supports Israeli warcrimes, because it equates Israel's right to defend itself against terrorists with murder of civilians, which are two totally different things.
No. Supporting the bombing of Hiroshima is not the same as supporting terrorism.
This one should be obvious. How is nuking civilians not a war crime, but terrorism is? Might is right philosophy?