Things to Consider Before Attempting to Correct the King James Bible
- Thread starter Andrew1
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E
Oh, Unlike you, I trust God has kept his word in tact, There may be some varrying differences in some things, but his word. The truth, is in tact.
I do not believe God had to 1600 years later have his word interpreted into a horrific language, which has so many issues by itself. It is an untrustworthy source. And say that everyone from that point on has to use it as an original to be interreted into all other languages.
Oh I think he could if he wanted to. (I do not think he needed to) Sadly for you, If he did, the word would be almost twice as large as it is (it would have to to correctly and infallibly translate the greek and hebrew and chaldian text into a perfect english language, of which there is no equal in print today nor has there ever been)
You have a word for word interpretation. Good for you. It is still flawed. Because it is NOT COMPLETE. No matter how much you think it is.
I do not believe God had to 1600 years later have his word interpreted into a horrific language, which has so many issues by itself. It is an untrustworthy source. And say that everyone from that point on has to use it as an original to be interreted into all other languages.
Oh I think he could if he wanted to. (I do not think he needed to) Sadly for you, If he did, the word would be almost twice as large as it is (it would have to to correctly and infallibly translate the greek and hebrew and chaldian text into a perfect english language, of which there is no equal in print today nor has there ever been)
You have a word for word interpretation. Good for you. It is still flawed. Because it is NOT COMPLETE. No matter how much you think it is.
E
You defend by attacking
If the KJV was as you say, You would never need to stoop low by attacking others saying their bible is from satan, Your arguments would stand on truth according to the word. And the use and rules of language, They don't. So your FORCED to attack people. Because thats all you have
Stop yelling at people saying they are attacking you when you attack them
This holier than thou crap of its ok for you but not everyone else is intollerable. Thats why people DISPISE trying to even have a conversation wich people like you. Because you do the very thing you demand others not do to you.
If the KJV was as you say, You would never need to stoop low by attacking others saying their bible is from satan, Your arguments would stand on truth according to the word. And the use and rules of language, They don't. So your FORCED to attack people. Because thats all you have
Stop yelling at people saying they are attacking you when you attack them
This holier than thou crap of its ok for you but not everyone else is intollerable. Thats why people DISPISE trying to even have a conversation wich people like you. Because you do the very thing you demand others not do to you.
E
I am still waiting for any one of the KJV onliers to answer my question.
Why , if God inspired the KJV, did he not tell the writters how to correctly TRSANSLATE the word baptizo. Why did the authors have to TRANSLITERATE the word. Which has since caused massive division in the church ever since, because the correct DEFENITION is not used in the text.
Why , if God inspired the KJV, did he not tell the writters how to correctly TRSANSLATE the word baptizo. Why did the authors have to TRANSLITERATE the word. Which has since caused massive division in the church ever since, because the correct DEFENITION is not used in the text.
E
Gods word speaks for itself. It is in unity. If I see a passage which APPEARS to contradict. I study further, why do they appear to contradict. Is it a word usage? A scribal error> Or a translation error? If I do this with an open mind, No version of scripture can lead me astray.
At the same time, I know Gods word in any englsih text is lacking due to the english language itself. In knowing this, I can always look to the origional text (all of them) to find what God is really tryign to say.
I have faith in God Not some old english translation.
Are you going to answer my question about baptizo? Or continue to ignore it?
At the same time, I know Gods word in any englsih text is lacking due to the english language itself. In knowing this, I can always look to the origional text (all of them) to find what God is really tryign to say.
I have faith in God Not some old english translation.
Are you going to answer my question about baptizo? Or continue to ignore it?
You have not pointed out contradictions in truth. The so called errors are only opinions.
ESV 2 Samuel 21:19 And there was again war with the Philistines at Gob, and Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim, the Bethlehemite, struck down Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver's beam.
ESV 1 Chronicles 20:5 And there was again war with the Philistines, and Elhanan the son of Jair struck down Lahmi the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver's beam.
Who did Elhanan kill? I thought David slew Goliath.