Gospel Confusion...

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
22,721
7,769
113
63
PaulThomson said:
Oh. I understand there is a difference. The man who has received the Lord Jesus and the Holy Spirit has power and resources at his disposal that enable him/her to more consistently be Christlike, do the will of God, and so to sin less. But the unregenerate man is not as godless, wicked and lacking in righteousness as your theory proposes.



Either every facet is partially corrupted or every facet is totally corrupted. If every facet is only partially corrupted, then all facets are capable of some uncorrupted activity. If all facets are only partially corrupted they are capable of some good. Does your theory allow for an unregenerate man to do some good?
The spiritual facet is gone. This being the case, every other aspect of man is still operative, but only according to the flesh.

You simply don't understand depravity.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
4,888
673
113
The spiritual facet is gone. This being the case, every other aspect of man is still operative, but only according to the flesh.

You simply don't understand depravity.
What is your scriptural proof that an unregenerate is incapable of doing anything good or righteous?
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
4,888
673
113
When you apply subjective comparatives as a means of trying to solidify a point that doesn't apply to us under the Gospel of Grace, that simply is a fallacious parallel. It's a straw man argument. Abraham was not under the Law of Moses nor was he going to be saved had he disobeyed what he was instructed to do. All before the Gospel of Grace were bound by some form of Law. We are not. They had to earn their salvation through obedience, we do not. The difference, therefore, is striking. Keeping that in mind helps to dispel the massive confusions that arise from trying to harmonize what they were under verses what we are under today from the time of the revelation of the mystery to Paul first.

MM
So, are you asserting that the standard of behaviour God requires of those who have Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit and a renewed purified spirit is less that what He expected of those who did not have Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit and a renewed spirit under the old covenant?
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
2,034
966
113
You simply don't understand depravity.
You simply don't understand that God did something about our depravity.

God the Father sent us His Son and the Holy Spirit.......They convict/confess to us.

The natural man under the conviction/confessing of the Holy Spirit sure can weigh his options.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
4,888
673
113
The spiritual facet is gone. This being the case, every other aspect of man is still operative, but only according to the flesh.

You simply don't understand depravity.
Cornelius was unsaved and unregenerate, but did righteousness in God's estimation.

ct 10:35
But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.

Was Cornelius as depraved as your theory demands he must have been?
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,723
357
83
Yes.... this appears to have been a very special occasion... a "one-off" kind of thing. The Jewish believers did not want to recognize Gentiles as believers. They thought it was for the Jewish people only, and we can infer from Peter's comments that they did not even want the Gentiles to be allowed to be baptized into Jesus...

Peter's "mission" was to show and convince the Jewish believers that God calls and accepts all races and ethnicities... and to prove that point, in the presence of the Jewish skeptics, the Gentiles received an indwelling of the Holy Spirit, along with the sign gift of speaking in tongues... just as the apostles received at Pentecost. This sign proved beyond a doubt that God accepted the Gentile believers.... whereupon Peter responded....

46 For they were hearing them speaking with tongues and exalting God. Then Peter responded, 47 “Surely no one can refuse the water for these to be baptized, who have received the Holy Spirit just as we did, can he?” 48 And he ordered them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked him to stay on for a few days.
Yes, the context does contain the stated command from Peter, who was indeed consistent with the gospel He knew from what was preached by John the Baptist and by Jesus, all aimed at Israel, not Gentiles nor the body of Christ that came into being after the fall of Israel and the beginning of the formation of the body of Christ with Paul as its very first member.

Good point, but it still doesn't equate to a commend for us today given that Paul never addressed it as a command from the Lord to us today.

Just want that to be understood by the other readers through this thread.

MM
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
22,721
7,769
113
63
You simply don't understand that God did something about our depravity.

God the Father sent us His Son and the Holy Spirit.......They convict/confess to us.

The natural man under the conviction/confessing of the Holy Spirit sure can weigh his options.
Sure, once God gets involved, all things become possible; but not before.
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,723
357
83
So, are you asserting that the standard of behaviour God requires of those who have Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit and a renewed purified spirit is less that what He expected of those who did not have Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit and a renewed spirit under the old covenant?
This seems to be the naturally occurring question that arises from the realization that we are not under the requirement for performance-based salvation. The many, many religions who today demand performance-based salvation and retention of said salvation that they teach about, this is the outflow from that doctrinal basis that is to pervasive among the denominations and cults.

When you speak of behavior, that, to me, bring forth the requirement for performance. Behavior, most generally, plays into the realm of our efforts and conduct in relation to perceived moral standards, requirements and Law.

When Paul spoke of the only basis for our salvation through the Gospel of Grace today, he was careful to divorce it from anything to do with our "behavior" in the broadest sense of that term. Yes, we are indeed to be subject to the guidance and direction of Holy Spirit given that we are sealed by Holy Spirit upon the basis of our faith in the death, burial and resurrection of Christ on the third day, according to the scriptures, for our redemption and cleansing of our sins in the past and in the future.

So, what matters is what was placed upon them back then before the Gospel of Grace, and what it placed upon us today. That they are different doesn't differentiate any of us apart from the ancients as anyone being more or less beholden to moral conduct. They, at that time, were required to DO by their efforts given that they were not filled by Holy Spirit. We today, guided and sealed by Holy Spirit, will, by nature through the guidance of that same Holy Spirit, will conduct ourselves willingly, walking by faith, working out our salvation with fear and trembling, but not in the manner as is presumed by the those who have sold themselves out to the system of work-based salvation.

Does that adequately answer your question? If not, then I would have to ask about the basis and perspective from which you're asking the questions rather than trying to guess at it, given the plethora of variants so many harbor in their understanding about works-based salvation versus walking by faith and everything in between.

MM
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
2,034
966
113
Sure, once God gets involved, all things become possible; but not before.
Well, that's what I don't understand from you. You preach depravity as if God has left us all hanging and is not involved.

He will convict/convince the world of their sin.......Some say yes, some say no.

Equal privilege, equal opportunity.......Justice/righteousness.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
4,888
673
113
Why should I not assume such? You've presented nothing from scripture that says otherwise that applies to us today.

Your reasoning suggests that the seal of Holy Spirit is weak and powerless to hold what is clearly His, in His Hands, from which none can be snatched. Do you know of a verse where the Lord admitted that some could and have "jumped from" His Hands? Please apply something solid and beyond doubt in its ability to substantiate your belief along this line.

I once believed as you, but no longer, so I know where you're coming from.

MM
If I seal a bottle of wine until 2050 expecting a high quality matured vintage, does that guarantee that the wine will be good when I open it? If I put a failsafe motor in a vehicle that will function perfectly until 2050, does that guarantee that the driver will never be injured or killed in a car accident before 2050? We are given the Holy Spirit as a downpayment on the house until the day that the house becomes due for full possession . But if we present a vandalised house to the purchaser on the handover day, He can still legally opt out of completing the deal.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
22,721
7,769
113
63
Cornelius was unsaved and unregenerate, but did righteousness in God's estimation.

ct 10:35
But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.

Was Cornelius as depraved as your theory demands he must have been?
Someone who fears God and works righteousness is saved. Do you see anything in the passage that says Cornelius isn't already saved?
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
22,721
7,769
113
63
Well, that's what I don't understand from you. You preach depravity as if God has left us all hanging and is not involved.

He will convict/convince the world of their sin.......Some say yes, some say no.

Equal privilege, equal opportunity.......Justice/righteousness.
No I don't. I merely say that man is helpless unless God gets involved.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
4,888
673
113
Without faith it is impossible to please God.
But Cornelius was not regenerate, and yet God considered that he had been doing commendable righteousness. Acts 10. So, are you agreeing that the unregenerate, though suffering from omni-faceted imperfection, can believe sufficiently in God to do some righteousness?
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
22,721
7,769
113
63
But Cornelius was not regenerate, and yet God considered that he had been doing commendable righteousness. Acts 10. So, are you agreeing that the unregenerate, though suffering from omni-faceted imperfection, can believe sufficiently in God to do some righteousness?
Who says Cornelius is unregenerate? It's not in the passage. On the contrary, he fears God and works righteousness. Those things aren't true of the unsaved, but the saved.
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,723
357
83
If I seal a bottle of wine until 2050 expecting a high quality matured vintage, does that guarantee that the wine will be good when I open it? If I put a failsafe motor in a vehicle that will function perfectly until 2050, does that guarantee that the driver will never be injured or killed in a car accident before 2050? We are given the Holy Spirit as a downpayment on the house until the day that the house becomes due for full possession . But if we present a vandalised house to the purchaser on the handover day, He can still legally opt out of completing the deal.
The problem I have with your metaphors is that they cascade out of control to the realities that govern this realm in the physical rather than to represent the Heavenly realm beyond this physical realm. I agree with you that we have an "earnest" of salvation, but the seal of Holy Spirit is not even hinted at as being something that is revocable, so beyond that I'm not understanding what you're getting at.

Are you saying that any truly saved individual can lose his salvation today?

MM
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
4,888
673
113
Someone who fears God and works righteousness is saved. Do you see anything in the passage that says Cornelius isn't already saved?
Act 10:6 He [Peter] lodgeth with one Simon a tanner, whose house is by the sea side: he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do.

What ought Cornelius to do? And why ought he to do it?

So, are you saying that one can be saved without knowing the gospel? What was God's purpose, in your opinion, for having Cornelius hear the gospel?
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
4,888
673
113
The problem I have with your metaphors is that they cascade out of control to the realities that govern this realm in the physical rather than to represent the Heavenly realm beyond this physical realm. I agree with you that we have an "earnest" of salvation, but the seal of Holy Spirit is not even hinted at as being something that is revocable, so beyond that I'm not understanding what you're getting at.

Are you saying that any truly saved individual can lose his salvation today?

MM
Well, scripture says that we are sealed with the Holy Spirit until some event. That indicates that we could possibly become unsealed at that event.