Concerning the gift of tongues

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
20,507
3,197
113
Is it not according the teachings from charismatics and Pentecostals that speaking in tongues is the sign, that someone has received the baptism of the Holy Spirit?
So if someone is not speaking in tongues, then this is the sign that he has not received the baptism of the Holy Spirit?
But is someone not baptised with the Holy Spirit, he has also not the Holy Spirit.
to be honest I have the holy spirit but since I do not speak in tongues I wonder if there is a difference between having the holy spirit and being baptized in the holy spirit.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
20,507
3,197
113
The rejection of the Pentecostal movement is not a doctrine but an observation.

Just as we reject the claims of Bigfoot-like people roaming the woods, so do we also reject the claims of Pentecostals.

I do not believe in Bigfoot not because of a systemic search of every inch of forest or every claim of a sighting. But the obvious lack of evidence that should be clearly evident is proof enough.

CS1, do you believe in Bigfoot? If not, why not?

I am not swallowing a camel because there is no Pentecostal camel to swallow.

Just claims of a camel.

If the claims of Pentecostalism were true we would all be Pentecostals.
Show me one verse that states that tongues has ceased, and by the way the way you respond in such a nasty manner to people and the fact you don't believe in the gift I would say you are spiritually dry
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,817
1,079
113
1 Corinthians 14:6-11 KJV - Now, brethren, if I come unto you speaking with tongues, what shall I profit you, except I shall speak to you either by revelation, or by knowledge, or by prophesying, or by doctrine?

7 And even things without life giving sound, whether pipe or harp, except they give a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped or harped?

8 For if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself to the battle?

9 So likewise ye, except ye utter by the tongue words easy to be understood, how shall it be known what is spoken? for ye shall speak into the air.

10 There are, it may be, so many kinds of voices in the world, and none of them is without signification. 11 Therefore if I know not the meaning of the voice, I shall be unto him that speaketh a barbarian, and he that speaketh shall be a barbarian unto me.

So here is showing that tongues people understand is how God wants it
1 Corinthians 14:39: "Therefore, my brothers and sisters, be eager to prophesy, and do not forbid speaking in tongues
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,817
1,079
113
why do you think that is? is the gift of tongues just that rare or is it just so misunderstood that it is not ever used correctly?
With all the fake tongues I have expereienced I would by all means think it is not a gift for today but I have a few times seen and tasted the real thing myself so I know it is real but why is it so rare I wonder?
Why are the gifts rare?

Because nearly all churches are traditional churches.

Traditional churches are not based on sola scripture.

All the gifts and ministries of the Holy Spirit are available for scripture only churches.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,817
1,079
113
Is it not according the teachings from charismatics and Pentecostals that speaking in tongues is the sign, that someone has received the baptism of the Holy Spirit?
So if someone is not speaking in tongues, then this is the sign that he has not received the baptism of the Holy Spirit?
But is someone not baptised with the Holy Spirit, he has also not the Holy Spirit.
I think you may be referring to a specific Pentecostal organization.

I have been to more than a few Pentecostal churches and tongues are not a sign of a baptism
in the Holy Spirit. According to the N.T. the gifts are distributed through the members of the church.

Not everyone speaks in tongues nor is everyone a prophet.

There is a far more important point to note in this debate.

1 Corinthians 4:20
For the kingdom of God does not consist in words but in power.

Who said that you must be a Pentecostal to experience the power of the Holy Spirit?
 
Oct 19, 2024
4,291
959
113
The rejection of the Pentecostal movement is not a doctrine but an observation.

Just as we reject the claims of Bigfoot-like people roaming the woods, so do we also reject the claims of Pentecostals.

I do not believe in Bigfoot not because of a systemic search of every inch of forest or every claim of a sighting. But the obvious lack of evidence that should be clearly evident is proof enough.

CS1, do you believe in Bigfoot? If not, why not?

I am not swallowing a camel because there is no Pentecostal camel to swallow.

Just claims of a camel.

If the claims of Pentecostalism were true we would all be Pentecostals.
The problem is that the Bible is unclear regarding the problematic aspects of pentecostalism.
IOW, the pentecostalists do not have one verse in the entire Bible that states :
  • The gift of tongues is for today
  • The gift of tongues did not stop by the time the bible was completed
Instead, we have Jesus never mentioning tongues and Paul in 1Cor.14:14-15 commending them in one sentence then
condemning them in the next and then in the rest of the chapter condoning them if interpreted. Hence the confusion,
but at least it is clear that tongues are NOT required for salvation NOR the sign of being filled with the Spirit, which is love.

(I note that Inquisitor seems to agree with this view :^)
 
Oct 19, 2024
4,291
959
113
The problem is that the Bible is unclear regarding the problematic aspects of pentecostalism.
IOW, the pentecostalists do not have one verse in the entire Bible that states :
  • The gift of tongues is for today
  • The gift of tongues did not stop by the time the bible was completed
Instead, we have Jesus never mentioning tongues and Paul in 1Cor.14:14-15 commending them in one sentence then
condemning them in the next and then in the rest of the chapter condoning them if interpreted. Hence the confusion,
but at least it is clear that tongues are NOT required for salvation NOR the sign of being filled with the Spirit, which is love.

(I note that Inquisitor seems to agree with this view :^)
Oops! I meant 1Cor.14:18-19.
 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
4,044
1,022
113
62
to be honest I have the holy spirit but since I do not speak in tongues I wonder if there is a difference between having the holy spirit and being baptized in the holy spirit.
So how you have the Holy Spirit, if you are not baptised with the Holy Spirit?
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
20,507
3,197
113
So how you have the Holy Spirit, if you are not baptised with the Holy Spirit?
Im just wondering if maybe the baptism of the spirit is not what we have been lead to believe think of how it was in pentecost and think of how Jesus breathed the holy spirit into the apostles they already had the spirit but on pentecost and from then on they were much different full of the spirit and power even to the point where peters shadow was able to heal

so if they had the spirit already but were different when pentecost came then maybe having the spirit and being baptized in it are not the same thing
 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
4,044
1,022
113
62
I think you may be referring to a specific Pentecostal organization.

I have been to more than a few Pentecostal churches and tongues are not a sign of a baptism
in the Holy Spirit. According to the N.T. the gifts are distributed through the members of the church.

Not everyone speaks in tongues nor is everyone a prophet.

There is a far more important point to note in this debate.

1 Corinthians 4:20
For the kingdom of God does not consist in words but in power.

Who said that you must be a Pentecostal to experience the power of the Holy Spirit?
Maby then they change their teaching, because the teaching is false.
Which started with Azusa Street and Agnes Ozman. The beginning of the Pentecostal movement. All pentecostal churches have their beginning there.
Btw later then the charismatic movement startet. So only pentecostals ore charismatics teach and practice this.
Today you find this teaching in almost all denominations, because this charismatic teaching attracts many believers who searching wonders and special feelings in their life. In my church this is taught in secret. Not on the pulpit. They do not practice it, but they have many contacts to pentecostal and charismatic churches where it is practised. Its strange, they defend this teaching, but not practice it.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
20,507
3,197
113
Maby then they change their teaching, because the teaching is false.
Which started with Azusa Street and Agnes Ozman. The beginning of the Pentecostal movement. All pentecostal churches have their beginning there.
Btw later then the charismatic movement startet. So only pentecostals ore charismatics teach and practice this.
Today you find this teaching in almost all denominations, because this charismatic teaching attracts many believers who searching wonders and special feelings in their life. In my church this is taught in secret. Not on the pulpit. They do not practice it, but they have many contacts to pentecostal and charismatic churches where it is practised. Its strange, they defend this teaching, but not practice it.
what is the difference between pentecostals and charismatics?
 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
4,044
1,022
113
62
Im just wondering if maybe the baptism of the spirit is not what we have been lead to believe think of how it was in pentecost and think of how Jesus breathed the holy spirit into the apostles they already had the spirit but on pentecost and from then on they were much different full of the spirit and power even to the point where peters shadow was able to heal

so if they had the spirit already but were different when pentecost came then maybe having the spirit and being baptized in it are not the same thing
What is with Thomas? He was not there when Jesus breathed the Holy Spirit into the apostles?
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
20,507
3,197
113
What is with Thomas? He was not there when Jesus breathed the Holy Spirit into the apostles?
I'm not sure really but the simple fact that the apostles had the spirit already and then at pentecost were much different seems to imply there is a difference
 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
4,044
1,022
113
62
I'm not sure really but the simple fact that the apostles had the spirit already and then at pentecost were much different seems to imply there is a difference
Well but this was only happend with the apostles which had anyway a special Status. You dont find this later reportet.
Neither in Acts 2 in the upperroom nor in Acts 8, 10 ore 19.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
20,507
3,197
113
The Pentecostals have their own churches.
Charismatics infilt existing churches/denominations.
do they have similar beliefs or are they different in doctrines? I have been accused of being a charismatic but honestly never understood what that is exactly but it soundd like a bad thing to be called
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
20,507
3,197
113
Well but this was only happend with the apostles which had anyway a special Status. You dont find this later reportet.
Neither in Acts 2 in the upperroom nor in Acts 8, 10 ore 19.
do you mean the spirit being breathed into someone?