Applying God's Word to Politics

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Aaron56

Well-known member
Jul 12, 2021
3,141
1,847
113
When God's Spirit governs His people, institutions of people can be changed.
Let me ask: according to the scriptures, by the end of the Age, does the world become better or worse? Also, are there any nations that do not bow to the rule of the Antichrist?
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
1,633
369
83
First, @GWH what exactly are you asking in your OP?

Then @maxwel what are you seeing in this thread that may be a foundational difference in the disagreements?
 

Aaron56

Well-known member
Jul 12, 2021
3,141
1,847
113
Our Lord's discussion of salt and light was directed to people (plural) and His people were mandated to influence other people. His Kingdom has a mandated outreach to teach about Him and of His commandments. Where is the limitation on this? The mandate is to disciple nations. Nations make up the world. Nations and the world are peoples. Institutions are of people. Again, where is the limitation on the outreach of instructing on behalf of the KING of the earth?
Those mandates are given to the church not to a particular nation. The KoG is never ruled by the consent of the people.

What you are suggesting sounds like 7 Mountain Mandate stuff whereby people of God take over institutions of the world to change the world and, you know, rewrite the ending of the scriptures. :rolleyes:

Ironically, when religious people take over institutions of the world, or establish institutions of their own, the people suffer, nations are bankrupted, and death follows. Always happens. Always will. Such arrangements support the rule of the AntiChrist NOT the Kingdom of God. We are to be "in the world not of the world", remember?
 
Oct 19, 2024
2,478
607
113
Do you even hear yourself?

Institutions cannot be governed by God's Spirit because He does not inhabit anything made with man's hands.

More shoe-horning.
Do you understand that you are disagreeing with God? For example, this teaching of Paul:

TOP #66: Governments or rulers [institutions] that are not tyrannical toward rightdoers are ordained by God to punish wrongdoers and should be obeyed. [RM 13:1-5] Those who stop reading this passage at verse two might misinterpret what it means. The reason for obedience should not only be fear of punishment but also because it is morally right [godly].
 
Oct 19, 2024
2,478
607
113
Only according to the law because there are laws that govern rights within a family. God does not treat "family" as an institution.

But the constitution of the US did not come first. The Kingdom of God came first and set the standard for life in the Spirit.

Most are so immersed in their traditions that they cannot perceive the KoG. They are like a fish trying to describe the ocean.
Webster's definition of institution:

c. a significant practice, relationship, or organization in a society or culture, e.g., the institution of marriage
 

Aaron56

Well-known member
Jul 12, 2021
3,141
1,847
113
Do you understand that you are disagreeing with God? For example, this teaching of Paul:

TOP #66: Governments or rulers [institutions] that are not tyrannical toward rightdoers are ordained by God to punish wrongdoers and should be obeyed. [RM 13:1-5] Those who stop reading this passage at verse two might misinterpret what it means. The reason for obedience should not only be fear of punishment but also because it is morally right [godly].
That's not what that means. Paul is talking about government within the church. Unless you want to call the North Korean government "God’s minister to you for good."

Let me guess: an American patriot taught that it meant "Obey the US government". :rolleyes:

The writer of Hebrews would say it this way "Obey those who rule over you, and be submissive, for they watch out for your souls, as those who must give account. Let them do so with joy and not with grief, for that would be unprofitable for you."

In the scriptures we even see Jesus give an account to the Father for His disciples and Paul, Peter, and John give an account of their disciples. They all learned this from the Lord.

So who watches over YOUR soul to the point of which they can give an account of you to God?
 

Aaron56

Well-known member
Jul 12, 2021
3,141
1,847
113
Webster's definition of institution:

c. a significant practice, relationship, or organization in a society or culture, e.g., the institution of marriage
Man's understanding vs. God's understanding. When you are debating principles of the Kingdom of God which one benefits you more?
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
1,633
369
83
Only according to the law because there are laws that govern rights within a family. God does not treat "family" as an institution.

But the constitution of the US did not come first. The Kingdom of God came first and set the standard for life in the Spirit.

Most are so immersed in their traditions that they cannot perceive the KoG. They are like a fish trying to describe the ocean.
Herein possibly lies part of the problem. Family has been taught as one of the Divine Institutions established by God. It's based beginning in interpretations of Genesis where God forms the man, the woman, their union, and from their union comes children. Thus, God created the institution of the human family. Within the family institution God created and mandated an authority structure and rules for each member.

In the KOG this institution currently remains. In addition, our union with Him is taught in marriage and familial terminology also with their authority structures.

Similar teachings from the Bible show how church and government are Divine Institutions beyond marriage and family.

The "traditions" of some of us have been the result of such learning that I doubt you'll be able to shake. I can assure you that some of us can speak of the KOG as well or maybe better than you can.

You're not responding to some of my counterarguments to your emphatic "no they're not" statements. I'm fine with not going further down some of those rabbit-trails, but please know I'm resting my case when there is no response. I understand that you may be doing the same.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
1,633
369
83
Let me ask: according to the scriptures, by the end of the Age, does the world become better or worse? Also, are there any nations that do not bow to the rule of the Antichrist?
I suppose the answer in part will take us into eschatology that I prefer not to discuss. In my experience it's one of the most combative areas of theology.

If you're asking if my soteriology is universalism, my answer is no.

Are you opposed to our Lord's mandate to His disciples to teach the nations all He commands?

Or are you opposed to Paul's stated mission of [bringing about] faith-obedience in all the nations on behalf of the name of Jesus Christ, YHWH's KING of the earth?

And again, do you see any limitations our Lord placed on these missions that should prevent His people from influencing institutions of people, especially the Divine Institutions?
 
Oct 19, 2024
2,478
607
113
First, @GWH what exactly are you asking in your OP?

Then @maxwel what are you seeing in this thread that may be a foundational difference in the disagreements?
I am asking folks how we should apply Christian beliefs to politics, following the example of when Peter told the Sanhedrin "We must obey God rather than men!" (Acts 5:29)

I was asking how we should do this during the Marxist-Fascist Biden administration, but now I am asking how Trump's MAGA folks should apply biblical morality to various political problems. For example, were it not a cynical effort to import Dem voters, open borders could be viewed as loving toward the poor of the world, but is that true?

In the present discussion, how can biblical values serve as salt and light for families, churches and governments?
Or asked another way, what is the relationship between the KOG and human society?
 

Eli1

Well-known member
Apr 5, 2022
5,441
2,399
113
47
What i love most about the sailor is his lack of self-awareness. :D
Especially when he says things like :

Are you disagreeing with God?:LOL:
or
Let us reason together - and he doesn't give an inch nor processes the questions. :ROFL:

This is why i love him.
Thank you for coming into this forum and making me more active because i don't typically discuss to death many topics that people do over an over.
This is also evident in my post count compared to other users who have been here at the same time as me. :giggle::coffee:

God bless you sailor!
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
1,633
369
83
Those mandates are given to the church not to a particular nation. The KoG is never ruled by the consent of the people.

What you are suggesting sounds like 7 Mountain Mandate stuff whereby people of God take over institutions of the world to change the world and, you know, rewrite the ending of the scriptures. :rolleyes:

Ironically, when religious people take over institutions of the world, or establish institutions of their own, the people suffer, nations are bankrupted, and death follows. Always happens. Always will. Such arrangements support the rule of the AntiChrist NOT the Kingdom of God. We are to be "in the world not of the world", remember?

I realize who those mandates are given to and think I stated who, which I don't think should lead you to suggest I said He gave them to a specific nation. Nor do I see the point of your telling me who the KOG is ruled by. Why do you find such statements necessary?

Although I've read about 7MM after first reading about it in the News section of this forum, I don't follow such things or find much interest in them unless they might show up in some interpretations of Scripture discussions. Even then, they normally do not pique my interest. Again, your comment about rewriting the end of the Scriptures is eschatology, so I'll leave you to discuss that with others if you'd like. For the most part I view this thread as discussing what we do in the here and now in regard to political issues.

I'll also disregard your last paragraph for this reason. When we start talking in absolutes as you are there, normally such includes statements that we cannot possibly back up. With respect you cannot know what "always happens" so your overall statement is merely an opinion for effect that looks to be used for some all-encompassing conclusion you assert to prove your point. To me it does just the opposite.
 
Oct 19, 2024
2,478
607
113
That's not what that means. Paul is talking about government within the church. Unless you want to call the North Korean government "God’s minister to you for good."

Let me guess: an American patriot taught that it meant "Obey the US government". :rolleyes:

The writer of Hebrews would say it this way "Obey those who rule over you, and be submissive, for they watch out for your souls, as those who must give account. Let them do so with joy and not with grief, for that would be unprofitable for you."

In the scriptures we even see Jesus give an account to the Father for His disciples and Paul, Peter, and John give an account of their disciples. They all learned this from the Lord.

So who watches over YOUR soul to the point of which they can give an account of you to God?
Re RM 13:3-5, "Paul is talking about government within the church.": Wow! I've never heard that one before!

Maybe the Sanhedrin "bore the sword" in some cases, but they "brought punishment on" Christians who were not "wrongdoers", so obviously Paul had the "government authorities" in mind, because nowhere does he refer to the churches as wielding power and collecting taxes (v.6-7).
 
Oct 19, 2024
2,478
607
113
Man's understanding vs. God's understanding. When you are debating principles of the Kingdom of God which one benefits you more?
BOTH dictionary definitions based on man's usage AND God's definition of salvation are beneficial, although salvation is more/most important.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
1,633
369
83
I am asking folks how we should apply Christian beliefs to politics, following the example of when Peter told the Sanhedrin "We must obey God rather than men!" (Acts 5:29)

I was asking how we should do this during the Marxist-Fascist Biden administration, but now I am asking how Trump's MAGA folks should apply biblical morality to various political problems. For example, were it not a cynical effort to import Dem voters, open borders could be viewed as loving toward the poor of the world, but is that true?

In the present discussion, how can biblical values serve as salt and light for families, churches and governments?
Or asked another way, what is the relationship between the KOG and human society?
It's interesting that the first 2 responses to your OP were: We don't then We do (and in essence we cannot do otherwise). I'll leave it for those posters to correct me if I'm misunderstanding what they said or meant.

Please clarify whether you're asking how "we" Christians think Trump's MAGA folks should be applying biblical morality... or whether you're assuming they are we.

I guess it seems the discussion should be what God says about any of the issues. Then I guess we should ask within the discussion whether we should just keep our findings to ourselves or send them to the elected representatives of the states we live in. Then I suppose we should ask the Head of the Ekklesia what He wants us to do. Or maybe we should have started with that research. Or maybe we already discussed it to some degree and as usual have come to no consensus.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,703
2,764
113
An example or a start?
A start - will write more later:

Romans 13 tells us to not to resist or disobey the governing authorities.
This leaves us with 2 immediate questions:
1.) What precisely constitutes a governing authority, both in Paul's time and for us today?
2.) What precisely does it mean to resist or disobey this authority, once we identify it?
* On examination, we'll find these questions are more complex than most Christians generally presume.

Sorting through these things will force us to think more deeply about the underlying principles.


I'll flesh it out later, when I have more time.

God Bless.

.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
1,633
369
83
A start - will write more later:

Romans 13 tells us to not to resist or disobey the governing authorities.
This leaves us with 2 immediate questions:
1.) What precisely constitutes a governing authority, both in Paul's time and for us today?
2.) What precisely does it mean to resist or disobey this authority, once we identify it?
* On examination, we'll find these questions are more complex than most Christians generally presume.

I'll flesh it out later, when I have more time.

God Bless.

.

I'll wait for you to "flesh it out" and will watch to see if you explain "good" and "bad (evil)" and other such concepts.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,703
2,764
113
I'll wait for you to "flesh it out" and will watch to see if you explain "good" and "bad (evil)" and other such concepts.
Sounds like you're an expert on these issues.
I'll just defer to you, and let you explain everything.
Thanks so much, I'm really busy.

.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
1,633
369
83
Sounds like you're an expert on these issues.
I'll just defer to you, and let you explain everything.
Thanks so much, I'm really busy.

.

I'm studied, normally learning and watching for new insights. Too bad you're busy. I won't take your place.
 
Oct 19, 2024
2,478
607
113
It's interesting that the first 2 responses to your OP were: We don't then We do (and in essence we cannot do otherwise). I'll leave it for those posters to correct me if I'm misunderstanding what they said or meant.

Please clarify whether you're asking how "we" Christians think Trump's MAGA folks should be applying biblical morality... or whether you're assuming they are we.

I guess it seems the discussion should be what God says about any of the issues. Then I guess we should ask within the discussion whether we should just keep our findings to ourselves or send them to the elected representatives of the states we live in. Then I suppose we should ask the Head of the Ekklesia what He wants us to do. Or maybe we should have started with that research. Or maybe we already discussed it to some degree and as usual have come to no consensus.
I am asking the first question.

I agree with the second responder--and with your views rather than those of the first responder.

I notice that the third responder seemed to be addressing the issue I just posed in #770, if he was semi-serious.