Really? You couldn't find a good powdered wig. Is this payback for not choosing Flavius?
Powdered wigs are not Biblical! .Really? You couldn't find a good powdered wig. Is this payback for not choosing Flavius?
I'm glad we got that cleared up quickly. I wouldn't want to have to defend that in the powdered wig thread.Powdered wigs are not Biblical! .![]()
I am partial to blue but no manly hat has frills. Do you have a nice fedora?
Camergnius Pilates
It depends on who you ask. Some people say that Paul specifies this because the women always covered; but certain womenAnd also, why does Paul specifically say while praying or prophesying, as if it's something that can be taken on and off?
Finally I have evolved into a consiglieri.
It depends on who you ask. Some people say that Paul specifies this because the women always covered; but certain women
wanted to uncover while prophecying... so when Paul says "we have no such custom" he is referring to not having a custom of women uncovering to prophecy... obviously a lot of people disagree with that; but I've seen really good supporting research, it's not just some mysogynists making stuff up.
A maid or maiden is a virgin. Hence, "old maid" for an unmarried woman.At what age does a female cease being a maiden and becomes a "woman"? Or is it, rather, more accurately to ask, "what circumstance or event transforms the maiden into a woman?
The correct answer to this would greatly aid in my figuring out this mysterious issue.
Judging Christians on their practices is God's job, not yours. Spend your time doing homework on the text instead of trying to force your (very limited) understanding on others.lots of feminists in this forum. modern christian women have been posion by secularism. go back 100 years, all christian women cover their hair when praying back then
A maid or maiden is a virgin. Hence, "old maid" for an unmarried woman.
How times have changed...
Amah, young woman, in Biblical times, was always considered to be a virgin.Yes! I was thinking of that particular term when posing the question. I looked up instances relative
to the use of each term and noticed a verse that used both "maidens" and "women," and it was
presented in a context that attached "children" to "women" so, I think that touches on a specific
distinction between the applicability of each term. What seems apparent, to me anyway, that the
"wo(mb)" in a maiden is, ideally at least, inactive or if you will, ying dormant, until she is given to "man."
And this understanding makes more sense of all the head shaving going on.
Amah, young woman, in Biblical times, was always considered to be a virgin.
If she was not was a very serious matter. It was policed at the time of betrothal.
Proof had to be given by the family if the man made claims contrary to the maidens.
Some believe that only defiled women (especially such as prostitutes) wouldImagining a community riddled with shaven women, I see no wonder that long hair would then have been a woman's glory.
That's awesome. But I'm going to have to take my hat off more to get my face tanned like the rest of me.