Where the heck are you getting this nonsense from?
This is some seriously warped theology.
Rev 20:2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
Satan is described as a dragon and a serpent in Revelation 20:2
Isa 27:1 In that day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that
is in the sea.
In Isaiah 27:1 Leviathan is described as a serpent and a dragon. One can comfortable assume that Leviathan is Satan.
Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
Most do not have a problem accepting the serpent in Genesis 3 to be Satan.
So why would anyone have a problem accepting the serpent and dragon called Leviathan as Satan? It logically fits. God Introduces Satan in chapter one of Job as beholding all high things. We are told that Leviathan beholds all high things in chapter 41, so why should we be slow to accept Leviathan as Satan? We don't have a problem accepting the serpent in the garden as Satan. Is it because the accepted narrative of Job would not fit?
Job 41:34 "He beholdeth all high
things: he
is a king over all the children of pride."
Leviathan beholds all high things and is king over all the children of pride.
Job 41:4 Will he make a covenant with thee? wilt thou take him for a servant for ever?
God is asking Job if he will take Leviathan, alias Satan, as a servant forever. So I ask you, is this offensive to those who place Job on Holy ground?