Because the Vaccine interferes with development.Why would you assume that?
Development is taking place for 7 months of the pregnancy.
Yet, the Baby, completely developed and checked out to be healthy.
Because the Vaccine interferes with development.Why would you assume that?
Because the Vaccine interferes with development.
Development is taking place for 7 months of the pregnancy.
Yet, the Baby, completely developed and checked out to be healthy.
Cardiomyopathy (weakened heart) is the leading cause of death from one week to 1 year after birth. The jab is also known to cause cardiomyopathy as a potential side effect.
If a jab caused weakness, every heart beat is a roll of the dice for a fatal result, death won't necessarily happen prior to birth.
That is putting it too mildly....the vaccines were not ready for distribution because they do not have long term efficacy and they have many many side effects, including death it appears
Will you stop with all the facts!!That is putting it too mildly.
1. The word vaccine was FRAUDULENTLY applied to preparations which were full of lethal and toxic substances. That is medical fraud.
2. The testing was done inadequately and improperly. Indeed the net result should have been that all the "vaccines" were TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE and EXTREMELY DANGEROUS. When AstraZeneca tested their vaccine on monkeys, they all died. A few countries even banned them, but there should have been a general and total ban.
3. Not a single "vaccine" was capable of producing genuine immunity, since not a single one had an actual attenuated virus. Which is why they are producing more infections after vaccinations. See the state of Vermont results.
4. The long-term effects of these injections were totally disregarded.
5. FULL DISCLOSURE has never been given to any person who took the jab. It would have meant explaining the harmful and lethal effects of each and every one of the many substances within those vaccines. This was a violation of the Nuremberg Code. Had full disclosure been given not a single person would have accepted the jab.
6. The actual number of "vaccines" deaths and disabilities has never been disclosed, and never will. Medical fraud was committed in assigning vaccine deaths to COVID deaths or some other factor, or simply suppressing the reports. And this continues daily. Also the only entities which are even counting the adverse effects are the USA and the EU. What about the rest of the world?
Sorry, you used not the word damn for the vaccine against Covid.I haven't "damned" the vaccine, just promote meds that are proven without having to be part of the experiment.
Most babies suffering from Cardiomyopathy have a BLUE Hinge to their skin tone and this baby is Peach and Red!
Aside of course from natural immunity and good health.
That is putting it too mildly.
1. The word vaccine was FRAUDULENTLY applied to preparations which were full of lethal and toxic substances. That is medical fraud.
2. The testing was done inadequately and improperly. Indeed the net result should have been that all the "vaccines" were TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE and EXTREMELY DANGEROUS. When AstraZeneca tested their vaccine on monkeys, they all died. A few countries even banned them, but there should have been a general and total ban.
3. Not a single "vaccine" was capable of producing genuine immunity, since not a single one had an actual attenuated virus. Which is why they are producing more infections after vaccinations. See the state of Vermont results.
4. The long-term effects of these injections were totally disregarded.
5. FULL DISCLOSURE has never been given to any person who took the jab. It would have meant explaining the harmful and lethal effects of each and every one of the many substances within those vaccines. This was a violation of the Nuremberg Code. Had full disclosure been given not a single person would have accepted the jab.
6. The actual number of "vaccines" deaths and disabilities has never been disclosed, and never will. Medical fraud was committed in assigning vaccine deaths to COVID deaths or some other factor, or simply suppressing the reports. And this continues daily. Also the only entities which are even counting the adverse effects are the USA and the EU. What about the rest of the world?
Bad Heart = Bad Circulation!Pallor is possible... But blue? No. Please cite your source if you dispute this.
A mother while pregnant [[is Vaccinated TWICE]] before giving Birth.
Baby is BORN healthy!
But it dies 2 1/2 months later.
If the Vaccines were going to KILL the Baby, IT WOULD NEVER FULLY DEVELOPED TO BE BORN!
It would have been stillborn!
Some people here are clueless!
yes it was founded by bill gatesThey were giving a vaccine like shot for aids,I’m not sure I understand?
Because the Vaccine interferes with development.
Development is taking place for 7 months of the pregnancy.
Yet, the Baby, completely developed and checked out to be healthy.
But KNOWING ALL of the Points you think you've made, Millions are still getting Vaxxed.
Why?
Because just like EVERY VACCINE before us, we are at a less than HALF A SINGLE PERCENT [.5] DEATH RATE versus [99.5%] SURVIVAL RATE and that's saying EVERY death is VAX related [which we know is FALSE]!
With ALL of the Deaths You, Ed, Others post daily, IT'S NOT EVEN ADDING UP TO 1% of Total Deaths versus Survival Rate!
As a Doctor, you're happy its't been that SUCCESSFUL!!
I love 99.5% Guarantees!
Rose BergThey were giving a vaccine like shot for aids,I’m not sure I understand?
so don't forget to get yours especially if you are pregnant
out of the mouths of deniers and fans comes the unwitting truth![]()
Correct! And how many people out of more then 7 billion people have natural immunity and good health?
Do you only think for the healthy and wealthy people of this world?
Someone who needs a Louisville Slugger wooden 34" length baseball bat to the noggin, is WHO!WHO complains about a 99.5% Survival Rate?
WHO complains about a 99.5% Survival Rate?