Just give me a straight answer.Who created the heavens and the earth by Himself and all alone (Isaiah 44:24)?
Just give me a straight answer.Who created the heavens and the earth by Himself and all alone (Isaiah 44:24)?
Most of your views are resoundingly UNbiblical.Yes, most definitely.
The Father, who is a Spirit inhabiting eternity without flesh, descended into time and took on an added nature of human flesh.
And, He did not VACATE ETERNITY when He descended. Because it is the nature of One who inhabits eternity that He dwells in it for ever.
Then, in the Person of the Holy Ghost, He ascended again (Luke 23:46) to inhabit eternity.
So, when Jesus released His Spirit (the Father, John 4:23-24, John 14:7-11) back into eternity, it created the reality that God (the Father) exists side-by-side with God (the Father; even the Holy Ghost) in eternity (John 1:1-2). And it is the same Person who exists beside Himself (and no, I am not saying that God is crazy; I am saying that He is Triune).
Most of your views are resoundingly UNbiblical.
Mark 1:11 refutes your first statement.
Acts 1:9 refutes your third statement.
John 1:2 refutes your fourth statement.
The idea that there is a "Person who exists beside Himself" in not in Scripture... at all, anywhere.
Your claims are empty.Mark 1:11 does not refute my first statement; because of my 2nd statement.
Acts 1:9 does not refute my third statement; because in it I was not saying that the Son did not also ascend.
And John 1:2 simply does not refute my fourth statement.
The Father was still in heaven; He did not take on flesh. If He had, then folks would have seen Him. Yet John stated plainly and clearly, "No one has ever seen God" ("John 1:18). Mark 1:11 shows that a voice from heaven came; meaning that God the Father was in heaven, not on earth in visible form. Your second statement is not founded on Scripture, so it has no evidentiary value in supporting your first."The Father, who is a Spirit inhabiting eternity without flesh, descended into time and took on an added nature of human flesh."
Nothing whatsoever suggests that Jesus ascended "in the Person of the Holy Spirit". You're making things up as you go along. Jesus ascended bodily (Acts 1:8). Luke records that Jesus "gave up His spirit" in 23:46; it does not say that He gave up the Holy Spirit. As I argued previously, with no attempt at refutation from you, Jesus had a human spirit."Then, in the Person of the Holy Ghost, He ascended again (Luke 23:46) to inhabit eternity."
This is silly, because the Father is not the Holy Spirit, nor is He the human spirit of Jesus. Jesus (the Word) is distinct from the Father, hence John 1:2 is adequate to refute your claim. Jesus pre-existed His incarnation, which you implicitly deny.So, when Jesus released His Spirit (the Father, John 4:23-24, John 14:7-11) back into eternity, it created the reality that God (the Father) exists side-by-side with God (the Father; even the Holy Ghost) in eternity (John 1:1-2). And it is the same Person who exists beside Himself (and no, I am not saying that God is crazy; I am saying that He is Triune). "
You still have not answered my question regarding Isaiah 6. You're avoiding it, because it completely disassembles your heretical views on the trinity.
Answer the question first.I am unaware of how you think the answer to your question dismantles my views on the Trinity. Maybe you can spell it out for me?
Repeat the question and maybe I'll think about it.Answer the question first.
Who appeared to Isaiah, as recorded in Isaiah 6?Repeat the question and maybe I'll think about it.
What other options are there?
I see only one other option...that God Himself (the Father) became a Man...
But by all means present your other options.
I do not need to define the term to you in order to understand what it means.
Since you were the one asking what it means, you look it up in a dictionary.
Okay, fine.
That Jesus was begotten in the incarnation means that He was given a body of human flesh and His Spirit came to dwell in that body of human flesh; creating a distinct Person who is, in Spirit, the same Spirit as the Father.
Now I know that the concept of Jesus being eternally begotten is slightly different; however that is the false dichotomy.
That would have to do with an eternal mirror being created in heaven and Jesus being on the other side of that mirror from the Father.
However that would indicate two Gods rather than one so I reject that idea.
I believe that the Son was "made of the seed of David according to the flesh"; and that in this, the one eternal Spirit that inhabits eternity descended into time to take on an added nature of human flesh.
For the Father is a Spirit (John 4:23-24);
And the Son, being also God, is a Spirit (John 4:24).
However, there is one Spirit (Ephesians 4:4).
Therefore the Father and the Son are in effect the same Spirit; albeit the Son is come in human flesh (John 1:1,14, 1 John 4:1-3, 2 John 1:7).
And Jesus was begotten (given a body of human flesh, Hebrews 10:5, and thus human life) in the incarnation.
Does that fourm deal with cults? I am thinking of adding one that deals with them.I am actually citing myself from another forum.
You will have to ask them. I find that most that start a cult ministry are themselves cultish in faith and practice. Just my experience.Does that fourm deal with cults? I am thinking of adding one that deals with them.
The words "only begotten" do not refer to the 'incarnation'. The Son was the "only begotten" from eternity before humanity ever existed. Read John 1:18, 3:16 carefully. The Father gave the Son (only begotten) before the Son appeared on earth in the likeness of sinful flesh. 1 John 4:9 confirms this:So, He can easily be begotten in the incarnation
I've heard that 'unique' or 'one-of-a-kind' come closer to the meaning of monogenes than does 'only-begotten'. They are also familiar to modern readers, whereas 'begotten' is really only familiar to folks who read the KJV... and many of them don't have a handle on what it means.The words "only begotten" do not refer to the 'incarnation'. The Son was the "only begotten" from eternity before humanity ever existed. Read John 1:18, 3:16 carefully. The Father gave the Son (only begotten) before the Son appeared on earth in the likeness of sinful flesh. 1 John 4:9 confirms this:
1Jn 4:9: "In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him."
"Only begotten", monogene (etc) does not have anything to do with time, or 'incarnation'. It refers to the nature of the Son in relation to the Father. The Son is the only of one of the same nature of Deity as the Father. Angels are created, as are humanity, both with differing nature's than Deity and differing from one another. The created angels and created humanity are sons to God, but not in the same way that the Son is, because of His nature as Deity.
If Jesus was the Father, why did he pray to himself?
I have a cultic background. After being born again, I studied under Walter Martin. I have been witnessing to people in and out of cults for decades. Revivals tend to follow me.You will have to ask them. I find that most that start a cult ministry are themselves cultish in faith and practice. Just my experience.
Hi Brother, I see monogene as being only unique. I am filmilar with independent ministries who claims the Son of God came into existence before creation. Please, clarifly your positions to remove all doubts. Thanks, DanielThe words "only begotten" do not refer to the 'incarnation'. The Son was the "only begotten" from eternity before humanity ever existed. Read John 1:18, 3:16 carefully. The Father gave the Son (only begotten) before the Son appeared on earth in the likeness of sinful flesh. 1 John 4:9 confirms this:
1Jn 4:9: "In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him."
"Only begotten", monogene (etc) does not have anything to do with time, or 'incarnation'. It refers to the nature of the Son in relation to the Father. The Son is the only of one of the same nature of Deity as the Father. Angels are created, as are humanity, both with differing nature's than Deity and differing from one another. The created angels and created humanity are sons to God, but not in the same way that the Son is, because of His nature as Deity.
I don't recall ever teaching children how to pray or praying to the Father in front of them. What texts do you have in mind? A little exploring now.[
to teach the children how to pray