and the word was God
both God and the Word make up God,
that verse says the Word was with God
and the word was God
and it says the word was god too and became Flesh . what is your point? That Jesus the Son is God amen ans that God the Father is God amenboth God and the Word make up God,
that verse says the Word was with God
and it says the word was god too and became Flesh . what is your point? That Jesus the Son is God amen ans that God the Father is God amen
The Word became flesh, but was never created.It was a reply to those who think the Word was created.
God and the Word [2] beings,
became the Father and Son[2 beings]
The Word became flesh, but was never created.
You have a distorted view of God my friend. I once was where you are now. When I saw the word ‘God’ in the Bible, I thought it was referring to the Father. I once held to a modalistic view of God. Then that view became Arianism later. Finally, by God’s grace, He(pneuma...Spirit not ‘it’) opened my eyes to see a Triune Godhead...one God, three Persons.both God and the Word make up God,
that verse says the Word was with God
You have a distorted view of God my friend. .
No. I am saying the Word has always been with the Father. You viewing the Spirit as an ‘it’ causes you to have a distorted view of God, my friend.Are you saying that the Word was not with God in the beginning?
The Word, Jesus, is with God now. So what point are you trying to make my friend? He is seated on the right hand of the Father with God now.both God and the Word make up God,
that verse says the Word was with God
My Point? again I was replying to someone who said Jesus was created,The Word, Jesus, is with God now. So what point are you trying to make my friend? He is seated on the right hand of the Father with God now.
That’s correct. But you’re placing an ‘it’ on the Holy Spirit when Jesus plainly called Him a person is quite troubling.My Point? again I was replying to someone who said Jesus was created,
but the bible says Jesus as the Word was With God [the Father] from forever.
hahI didn't realize there was so much confusion on the trinity.
I thought this was pretty well sorted about 1700 years ago, by the time we got to the Council of Constantinople.
This is like arguing with atheists.
They'll often pose some "new and impossible dilemma", having no idea the question first surfaced over 2500 years ago, and it's already been soundly answered for millennia.
..
...
That’s correct. But you’re placing an ‘it’ on the Holy Spirit when
Jesus plainly called Him a person is quite troubling.
If you have studied church history, you know there were a BUNCH OF
different ideas floating around about who Jesus was.
Then why does it refer to the Holy Spirit in (John 1:32; Romans 8:16).
as it ?
Why does the epistles have most all greeting to God the Father,
and Jesus Christ, but not the Holy Spirit
Then why does it refer to the Holy Spirit in (John 1:32; Romans 8:16).
as it ?
Why does the epistles have most all greeting to God the Father,
and Jesus Christ, but not the Holy Spirit
Why does the epistles have most all greeting to God the Father, and Jesus Christ, but not the Holy Spirit
(John 1:32; Romans 8:16).
Joh 1:32 And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit
descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him.
Rom 8:16 The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: