Unless there is one. (chuckle)
Eschatalogical theologies are like noses. Everybody's got one.
Who nose? Not even Jesus. (MT 24:36)
Unless there is one. (chuckle)
Eschatalogical theologies are like noses. Everybody's got one.
Neither one of those passages is a covenant., but I appreciate you sharing your reasoning.Here is what I see...
Jews of the Millennium will inherit the New earth....
And, after the destruction of this present planet, will then inherit the final New earth,
which the Bible calls "the home of righteousness."
As you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming. That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by fire, and the elements will melt in the heat. But in keeping with his promise, we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness. 2 Peter 3:12-13
As for us?
We, the Church?
We shall be the Bride of Christ.
Our home will be?
It will not be the New earth as the Millennial Jews will possess.
Our home, will be in Heaven.
Their destiny is destruction, their god is their stomach, and their glory is in their shame. Their mind is set on earthly things. But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ." Philippians 3:19-20
That has to be two different covenants.
You decide what to do with that...
I just stated the facts.
Too many argue over covenants as it now is.
grace and peace ..........
There are some schools of thought about this, one of them being that once the world of the Gentiles, the nations, no longer countenance the Gospel, with it having been preached in every nation, no dialect having been left out, then the fullness will have come in.
Whether that happens in my lifetime, given that none of us knows for sure that we will still be in this world tomorrow, I believe it will be soon after having seen the map created be the world missions board and how few areas are left where the Gospel is not known to have been preached and Bibles in their language. The gaps are closing fast.
MM
Neither one of those passages is a covenant., but I appreciate you sharing your reasoning.
Or, they describe 2 covenants that the Bible does speak concerning and your timing of their application is off.They spoke of two distinct groups of believers, that were so different from one another, that they could not be within the same covenant.
Jews of the Millennium will inherit the New earth....
And, after the destruction of this present planet, will then inherit the final New earth,
which the Bible calls "the home of righteousness."
As you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming.
That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by
fire, and the elements will melt in the heat. But in keeping
with his promise, we are looking forward to a new heaven
and a new earth, the home of righteousness. 2 Peter 3:12-13
As for us?
We, the Church?
We shall be the Bride of Christ.
Our home will be?
It will not be the New earth as the Millennial Jews will possess.
Our home, will be in Heaven.
Their destiny is destruction, their god is their stomach,
and their glory is in their shame. Their mind is set on earthly
things. But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await
a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ." Philippians 3:19-20
That has to be two different covenants.
Or, they describe 2 covenants that the Bible does speak concerning and your timing of their application is off.
You can't even show what you are saying is in the word of God. Rather than speculate on something, perhaps you should understand what the scripture says by what the scripture says.Sir.. I have nothing to say other than what I pointed out.
I am not here to make you understand what you seem (at present) to be incapable of grasping.
For we are all at different points in our spiritual maturity.
Its a fact of life. Nothing personal.
.......
You can't even show what you are saying is in the word of God. Rather than speculate on something, perhaps you should understand what the scripture says by what the scripture says.
Your last statement, though true, probably applies differently than you suspect.
And I never take offense, but I do consider the source.
Grace and peace.
Are you so condescending to people on purpose? Do you not recognize this about yourself?Cameron....
Are you doing what you do, on purpose?
I have known people who would be that way, and enjoy it.
Are you so condescending to people on purpose? Do you not recognize this about yourself?
Well, most everyone else is.
More of that fruit of the Spirit on display.I think I have no choice but to put you on Ignore.
It is the fair thing to do.
---------------------------------------------------------------------Who nose? Not even Jesus. (MT 24:36)
While he had to remain as a man that was the case...Who nose? Not even Jesus. (MT 24:36)
Matt 25 is the rapture of the bride.Jesus' parable of the wheat and tares illustrates that the tares will first be collected and tied in bundles (wrath) to be burned (at the end of the millennium) and then the wheat (those who are alive and remain) will be gathered into the barn (rapture, never to be burned) at the time of harvest. How has this order of events been reversed?
Any postrib rapture doctrine arrives at its doctrine via omission.Dr.Michael Brown has a unique perspective
Any postrib rapture doctrine arrives at its doctrine via omission.
Where did he present the pretrib rapture doctrine verses?
That would make sense then because I think that I might well have been raptured already, in the true sense, some time ago really, and since have been painfully watching the world in tribulation.Matt 25 is the rapture of the bride.
Pretrib, as is every rapture verse.
That would make sense then because I think that I might well have been raptured already, in the true sense, some time ago really, and since have been painfully watching the world in tribulation.It would take a book to explain it though.