There will be no Rapture!!!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Cameron143 said:
Adam had no life to impart, lost his righteousness, and was incapable of saving his wife. Not only didn't he die for her, he was incapable of dying for her.
Click to expand...

Moses is a type, but was not able to lead them into the promised land.
Joshua is a type, but did not give them rest.
The offerings are a type, but the blood of the sacrifices could not remove sin.
David is a type, but could not build the house of the LORD.
John is a type, but his baptism did not save.

Adam doesn't need to be Christ in order to foreshadow what Christ would do.
 
posthuman said:
Moses is a type, but was not able to lead them into the promised land.
Joshua is a type, but did not give them rest.
The offerings are a type, but the blood of the sacrifices could not remove sin.
David is a type, but could not build the house of the LORD.
John is a type, but his baptism did not save.

Adam doesn't need to be Christ in order to foreshadow what Christ would do.
Click to expand...
All true. But the content of being like Christ is offered in Romans 5. The only likeness there is representation of the human race.
 
  • Like
Reactions: posthuman
Cameron143 said:
His only chance to save her was not to eat. He wasn't thinking of her, but himself.
Click to expand...

would that have saved her?
do the lost receive eternal life by our faith?

in the end tho both of them were saved, by their confession and faith.
 
Cameron143 said:
All true. But the content of being like Christ is offered in Romans 5. The only likeness there is representation of the human race.
Click to expand...

the trespass and the gift are both compared and contrasted - and both involved the death of the man so that the bride would not die alone.

what i'm saying is Adam knowingly giving up his life to be with his bride, prefigures Christ laying down His life to be with us.
for Adam it was sin and ineffective, but for Jesus it is righteousness and gives us life - just like if you or i touched a leper, we would be unclean, but when Jesus touches one, the leper becomes clean. we can have the same compassion in our hearts, but we don't have the power in ourselves to heal the world - only if it is God dwelling in us does that kind of thing take place by our hands.

He is human, like us, but He is also God, unlike us. Adam couldn't do the God parts - the fig leaves had to come off, and they had to be clothed with robes God Himself made

maybe Adam thought he could - but i would think that's deception too, so i doubt it. i think more likely he knew it wouldn't save her: he did it anyway, knowing it was wrong.
 
posthuman said:
would that have saved her?
do the lost receive eternal life by our faith?

in the end tho both of them were saved, by their confession and faith.
Click to expand...
Agree. But he was representative of mankind. Had he remained faithful, he would have inherited eternal life for all mankind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: posthuman
posthuman said:
He is human, like us, but He is also God, unlike us. Adam couldn't do the God parts - the fig leaves had to come off, and they had to be clothed with robes God Himself made

maybe Adam thought he could - but i would think that's deception too, so i doubt it. i think more likely he knew it wouldn't save her: he did it anyway, knowing it was wrong.
Click to expand...

i don't think they expected the fig leaves to work. i think it was an expression of their shame, like wearing sackcloth and ashes. imo the tree of dying is a fig.
 
posthuman said:
i don't think they expected the fig leaves to work. i think it was an expression of their shame, like wearing sackcloth and ashes. imo the tree of dying is a fig.
Click to expand...
Agree. They were in effect GRAVECLOTHES.
A symbol of mourning and regret.
 
Cameron143 said:
How? Christ died for our sake, taking our sin upon Himself, to impart life and righteousness to us. Adam had no life to impart, lost his righteousness, and was incapable of saving his wife. Not only didn't he die for her, he was incapable of dying for her.
And this makes a mockery of the context of Romans 5. The only similarity there between Adam and Christ is that they both represented the human race.

If anything, he could have refused sin, achieved eternal life, and hoped to save her this way.
Click to expand...
Theoretically, the death of Adam MAY have been sufficient propitiation for the fall of the Woman (we will never know).
But it would have been a fixed 1:1 ratio in any case.

What we DO have now is an INFINITE LIFE that is an exceedingly overabundant propitiation for a still finite but innumerable number of sinners who have chosen/been chosen for salvation in His Name.

Because of course God always "overdoes it" when His sanctification and glory is at stake.
 
posthuman said:
the trespass and the gift are both compared and contrasted - and both involved the death of the man so that the bride would not die alone.

what i'm saying is Adam knowingly giving up his life to be with his bride, prefigures Christ laying down His life to be with us.
for Adam it was sin and ineffective, but for Jesus it is righteousness and gives us life - just like if you or i touched a leper, we would be unclean, but when Jesus touches one, the leper becomes clean. we can have the same compassion in our hearts, but we don't have the power in ourselves to heal the world - only if it is God dwelling in us does that kind of thing take place by our hands.

He is human, like us, but He is also God, unlike us. Adam couldn't do the God parts - the fig leaves had to come off, and they had to be clothed with robes God Himself made
Click to expand...
Again, all correct, but the fig leaves came after sin, thus, after his ability to save was past. And Adam, like Christ, was able to save. Had he not sinned, eternal life would have come through him. But I disagree that his motivation was selfless in partaking of the fruit.
 
cv5 said:
Theoretically, the death of Adam MAY have been sufficient propitiation for the fall of the Woman (we will never know).
But it would have been a fixed 1:1 ratio in any case.

What we DO have now is an INFINITE LIFE that is an exceedingly overabundant propitiation for a still finite but innumerable number of sinners who have chosen/been chosen for salvation in His Name.

Because of course God always "overdoes it" when His sanctification and glory is at stake.
Click to expand...
Adam did not possess eternal life before sinning. As God's representative for the human race, he could only attain it by not sinning. He couldn't become sin for her.
 
Cameron143 said:
But I disagree that his motivation was selfless in partaking of the fruit.
Click to expand...
Any how do you explain that position? What exactly did Adam hope to gain by intentionally sinning, knowing full well the implications?
 
Cameron143 said:
Adam did not possess eternal life before sinning.
Click to expand...
Ahhhh.....no.

God created Adam to enjoy eternity with Him. There is no doubt that Adam was created eternally alive because he was "unioned" with The Life. No sin, no breach, no interruption. Perfect fellowship, perfect life as God defines life.
 
 
posthuman said:
i don't think they expected the fig leaves to work. i think it was an expression of their shame, like wearing sackcloth and ashes. imo the tree of dying is a fig.
Click to expand...
Again correct. But at that point Adam had no means to save her. Obedience would have been a faithful act on his part; not disobedience.
And Christ didn't die so we wouldn't die alone. He died so we might live.
 
cv5 said:
Here you go @Cameron143 .....everything that you do not know of the account of Genesis 3.
Its only about 20 hours or so. Piece of cake.

Adam And Eve... What really happened?

1st Adam vs. The 2nd Adam. They're more alike than you might think

Adam, Eve & Satan. Do you really think you know this story?

Deep Teaching On Adam & Eve. This is the stuff you're not supposed to hear

Did Adam Blame Eve? It's not what you may have thought

Eve Is Dying Right In Front of Adam. If you were Adam, what would you do?

Satan, Why Did You Pick A Snake? Would Adam have been fooled by a snake?

Why A Tree Of Death? What caused the Tree of Death to be put in the garden of Eden?

Genesis 2 and 3... NOT Seeker Sensitive! That's why most churches don't teach this
Click to expand...
All probably great. But missing my point. Adam couldn't disobey and die to save Eve. He could only be faithful to save her.
 
cv5 said:
Ahhhh.....no.

God created Adam to enjoy eternity with Him. There is no doubt that Adam was created eternally alive because he was "unioned" with The Life. No sin, no breach, no interruption. Perfect fellowship, perfect life as God defines life.
Click to expand...
Disagree. Like Christ, he would have had to fulfill all righteousness to have eternal life.
 
cv5 said:
Any how do you explain that position? What exactly did Adam hope to gain by intentionally sinning, knowing full well the implications?
Click to expand...
Because he wasn't deceived. He knew eating led to death.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back