Then there is abrogation, so you need to know what came after something
historically because it changes what was said, or what is now applicable.
Yeah this is the most difficult part for me because they're turning the whole thing into a conspiracy.
They can be on the same level as an atheist and say that Jesus is not divine or something along those lines (and they do say that too), but to say that the whole crucifixion was an illusion?
That's how i know that i'm talking to a flat-earther basically.
