The same kind of wishful thinking that [desperately] wants the gap theory to be true.Wishful thinking? That’s funny.
Funny!
The same kind of wishful thinking that [desperately] wants the gap theory to be true.Wishful thinking? That’s funny.
It is not the Gap theory or Gap Idea........It IS the Gap FACT.I think it only fair to cover the Gap idea in Genesis 1 for brethren in Christ who have never heard of it nor realized Bible Scriptures about it even exists. I once asked a pastor I met if he knew about it, and he looked me sternly in the face and said, "No man showed me that, God showed me that." I then asked him if he taught it to his Church congregation and he said no, that only about a quarter of them would understand. So I asked him, "well what about that quarter? didn't God give it to them to know?" He didn't respond, so I don't know, maybe he braved his Church organization, risked getting fired, and taught it to them. I know one Church in my area that has a teaching pastor that is a Hebrew scholar, and that's all he does, and he teaches it to their Church.
My point is, that many studied pastors and Bible scholars understand about the Gap idea, but most are not allowed to teach it because of their Church organization policies. I don't think that fair to God's people, because He would not have given the Scriptures that point to it unless He wanted at least some of us to know about it.
So do what you will, believe it or don't, it's not a salvation issue. But if properly understood, it will... help with a deeper Bible understanding on what this present world is about and why Lord Jesus Christ had to come in the flesh and die on the cross to defeat death and the devil.
So hopefully the administrators will allow this to be posted.
(Continued...)
The same kind of wishful thinking that [desperately] wants the gap theory to be true.
Funny!![]()
It is not the Gap theory or Gap Idea........It IS the Gap FACT.
I was taught in Christian college that the Gap Theory says that there is a gap in history between the first two verses of the Bible to account for the evidence of ageing in God's creation, which began in verse one. That creation was destroyed, and God made a new one beginning in Genesis 1:2. I don't think there is any foundation in the Bible for such a theory.
My take on the age of the earth is that since Bishop Ussher figured the number of years strictly based on the genealogies in the Bible, he assumed the modern historical method of one year to one year. But the Bible's history is often very different. For example, there are many "gaps" in Matthew's genealogy from Abraham to Jesus: Matthew 1:17--"So all the generations from Abraham to David were fourteen generations, and from David to the deportation to Babylon fourteen generations, and from the deportation to Babylon to the Christ fourteen generations."
Anyone who studies the number of years involved can see that Matthew is working on a different time-scale than modern historians do. It's pretty obvious that Matthew may be using the number seven for his basis, not the literal number of years and generations. The Bible's history is preaching history that was written by the prophets and apostles to make spiritual points to their audiences. Similarly, Moses skips generations in his Genesis genealogies.
Furthermore, the "days" of creation in Genesis one may have been a lot longer than 24 hours, since the sun wasn't created until the fourth day, for example.
I don't think that we need to get all tied up in knots about such speculations. Let's concentrate more on the knowable matters centering on Jesus instead of the speculative ones.
I think it only fair to cover the Gap idea in Genesis 1 for brethren in Christ who have never heard of it nor realized Bible Scriptures about it even exists.
This is just plain silly talk. Just take down your blog.Onward to what Genesis says about creation, does it really say the universe or earth is 6000 years old? I don’t think it does, I think its a mistranslation of a primitive language that had only around 4000 words at the time Genesis was written, whereas the English language today has around 500,000 words.
These are FACTS, when you get to heaven you will see correctly. God also used Numbers like 12, 10 and 7 and that is why you guys do not understand the 144,000 code, you just are not intuitive enough to grasp God's codes, metaphors etc. etc.This is just plain silly talk. Just take down your blog.
Why would the creation account say that the earth is about 6,000 years old when it is IMPLIED in that account?
"Primitive language"? Hebrew is being used extensively in Israel at the present time.
"Only 4,000 words"? Yet God chose Hebrew to communicate His words and actions.
Wishful thinking? That’s funny. I guess that’s the only thing you can come up with to make it fit your theory.
The same kind of wishful thinking that [desperately] wants the gap theory to be true.
Funny!![]()
You "made a funny" while putting forth a more serious and suggestive remark.In the grand scheme brother, does it really matter? It’s a cordial debate. That’s it. I see in one way, and you another. I’m ok with that. No division between brothers in Christ.
How do you know that light came from millions of years away? Does the Bible teach that? Or is it so-called "science" that taught you that?Common sense should tell you that light from millions of years away could not be seen by us if the universe was only 6000 years old.
I did a blog years ago explaining this, I will post it below
You are correct but you do not explain why, how et al. Everything in the bible is true and it matches science if we know how to interpret what God is saying. Most people here have no idea what God really put forth about creation. They hear DAY and do not realize the word used for day (YOWM) had about 50 meanings, it could mean day, year, month, season, time period et al. The point is, with only 4000 words and no vowels, the Hebrew language used words like YOWM then you had to describe what "time period" you were speaking about, I can prove this with the word yowm, how its used for day, years, year, X Whole, and as a time period in general, and who explains what the Genesis time periods were? God, from His point of view. I astounds me people do not understand the Universe is 13.7 billion years old, and how many people do we lose to hell because they laugh at those who say the universe is only 6000 years old and can not believe anything we say because of that?
....
How do you know that light came from millions of years away? Does the Bible teach that? Or is it so-called "science" that taught you that?
Its called the Laws of Nature sir, God crested them when He created the universe. The problem with guys like you and your thought process, is since God is ETERNAL, He has no reason to SPEED THINGS UP, He lives in all time, so He lived in the end product as soon as He created the universe, which is why he knows our future, so since God is in no hurry, he's patient, He is eternal, why would God need to change the Laws of Nature He created to HURRY UP the Creation? The Speed of Light is a constant.How do you know that light came from millions of years away? Does the Bible teach that? Or is it so-called "science" that taught you that?
I have to disagree with much of that, simply because you bypassed the meaning of the KJV phrase "without form, and void" per the Hebrew tohu va bohu, which definitely does not mean the universe was in some stage of being created. It instead means per the Hebrew that the already created earth had become in "bondage of corruption" like Apostle Paul taught in Romans 8:18-25. So I would recommend that you not just use a single Bible verse as a jumping off point to revert to man's scientific theories about the creation.
No, that is not what it means IMHO, I never even mention that in my old blog, but have flushed it out since via debates.
....
You "made a funny" while putting forth a more serious and suggestive remark.