Other than the fact of it being the answer. Lol.This has nothing to do with the questions I asked.
Other than the fact of it being the answer. Lol.This has nothing to do with the questions I asked.
Yes I agree that the church is the only ones to ever receive Jesus as their king, that's why they're the church.Wrong. Presently, the Church ONLY has received Jesus as King.
Not the gentiles, not Israel. Israel will only receive King Jesus per Hos 5:15, at the end of the GT. For the futurist, Scripture is a breathtakingly complete tapestry. And satisfyingly confidence-inspiring.
(1Pe 2:9) But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:
(1Pe 2:10) Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.
Peter talking to JEWS that came to Christ, calling them a royal priesthood, an holy nation, which in TIMES PAST were not God's people, not a royal priesthood, not an holy nation chosen by God.
You guys make the same mistakes over and over. All Israel IS NOT of Israel.
How do you rationalize THIS GENERATION being anything other than the generation present before Jesus at the time he said it?The "Future" generation that will witness Daniel's abomination Matthew 24:15 and the Great Tribulation Matthew 24:21
It's impossible to gave a 70AD great tribulation and Jesus returning in the clouds 2,000 years later and waiting Matthew 24:29-30 "Immediately after thus tribulatuon"
I'm not going to argue with a person who believes in 5 different gospels. Sorry but it's pointless.Rightly divide the audience my friend. Peter’s audience is indeed the Jews but the Jews coming out of the tribulation. During the Church age, they were not a people, for God had temporarily cut them off. But at the second advent, they will once again be a holy people unto God.
Do you deny the clear reading of Deuteronomy?
The subtlies, vagaries, vicissitudes of those passages totally escape you....tragically. All the coaching in the world cannot help. The reason? You are mired in the pit of preterism and amillenialism.How do you rationalize THIS GENERATION being anything other than the generation present before Jesus at the time he said it?
I hear what you're saying, I see it differently.
I believe it is well established in psychology that a person can write something and then believe that it did not come from them.
and maybe it did, maybe it didn't.
it's one theory of how Ouija boards work, for example.
but this point, we've drifted into psychology.
is there a Bible topic you want to talk about related to preterism?
not at all. it's very possible that John the apostle did write revelation about 95 ad.
I don't know that the book of Revelation does talk about things that happened in 70 ad.
well, which events are still too come is a matter of interpretation, imo.
but God's word is always relevant!
What you’re really saying is that you don’t believe the words of the Bible. This generation only means this generation when it lines up with your theology.The subtlies, vagaries, vicissitudes of those passages totally escape you....tragically. All the coaching in the world cannot help. The reason? You are mired in the pit of preterism and amillenialism.
Juggling the fact of there being Jews, gentiles and the Church, as well as two unconditional covenants may make your head feel like its going to explode. But you are going to have to deal with it regardless. And the Scriptures are utterly perfect and complete in dealing with all of this.I'm not going to argue with a person who believes in 5 different gospels. Sorry but it's pointless.
And there’s only one gospel and it’s the same gospel that was preached to Abraham.Juggling the fact of there being Jews, gentiles and the Church, as well as two unconditional covenants may make your head feel like its going to explode. But you are going to have to deal with it regardless. And the Scriptures are utterly perfect and complete in dealing with all of this.
Lol. No. What I am really saying is what I said.What you’re really saying is that you don’t believe the words of the Bible. This generation only means this generation when it lines up with your theology.
kjv said: Even though just a couple of verses down Jesus said that this current generation would not pass till all those things be fulfilled?
Mat 24:34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
The "Future" generation that will witness Daniel's abomination Matthew 24:15 and the Great Tribulation Matthew 24:21
How do you rationalize THIS GENERATION being anything other than the generation present before Jesus at the time he said it?
The "Future" generation that will witness Daniel's abomination Matthew 24:15 and the Great Tribulation Matthew 24:21
It's impossible to gave a 70AD great tribulation and Jesus returning in the clouds 2,000 years later and waiting Matthew 24:29-30 "Immediately after thus tribulatuon"
Example:
Matthew 24:
ܗܝܕܝܢ ܢܫܠܡܘܢܟܘܢ ܠܐܘܠܨܢܐ ܘܢܩܛܠܘܢܟܘܢ ܘܬܗܘܘܢ ܣܢܝܐܝܢ ܡܢ ܟܠܗܘܢ ܥܡܡܐ ܡܛܠ ܫܡܝ
9 Then they will deliver you unto afflictions, and they will kill you, and you will be hated by all Nations because of My Name.
^
We know this is not 70 AD because only Rome, the leadership, hated the Believers and attacked Jerusalem.
This verse clarifies that ALL NATIONS will hate us, which indicates another event beyond 70 AD
sure if you insist the tribulation is only 7 yrs. But the tribulation is not only 7 years. We are still in the tribulation so Justin Trudeau's disdain for christians is part of the tribulation.Example:
Matthew 24:
ܗܝܕܝܢ ܢܫܠܡܘܢܟܘܢ ܠܐܘܠܨܢܐ ܘܢܩܛܠܘܢܟܘܢ ܘܬܗܘܘܢ ܣܢܝܐܝܢ ܡܢ ܟܠܗܘܢ ܥܡܡܐ ܡܛܠ ܫܡܝ
9 Then they will deliver you unto afflictions, and they will kill you, and you will be hated by all Nations because of My Name.
^
We know this is not 70 AD because only Rome, the leadership, hated the Believers and attacked Jerusalem.
This verse clarifies that ALL NATIONS will hate us, which indicates another event beyond 70 AD