Not everything I say is a “holy nugget.” The final authority is always the Bible. Always pray and test everything against Scripture — not just against personal feelings or spiritual impressions.
Grace and Peace
Grace and Peace
Not everything I say is a “holy nugget.” The final authority is always the Bible. Always pray and test everything against Scripture — not just against personal feelings or spiritual impressions.
Grace and Peace
Yes, I’ve noticed — and I’ve consistently presented sound theology, thoroughly supported with clear and comprehensive Scripture references.”On CC most prefer playing endless verbal ping-pong to systematic Bible study that seeks unity, harmony--
and arriving at a consensus conclusion!
That is a nice thought, but not very many people are interested in learning Scripture.
Most folks prefer devotional readings, emotional song services and fellowship/prayer groups.
On CC most prefer playing endless verbal ping-pong to systematic Bible study that seeks unity, harmony--
and arriving at a consensus conclusion!
Yes, I’ve noticed — and I’ve consistently presented sound theology, thoroughly supported with clear and comprehensive Scripture references.”
Grace and Peace
Not everything I say is a “holy nugget.” The final authority is always the Bible. Always pray and test everything against Scripture — not just against personal feelings or spiritual impressions.
Grace and Peace
Yes, I’ve noticed — and I’ve consistently presented sound theology, thoroughly supported with clear and comprehensive Scripture references.”
Grace and Peace
I'm not a "Calvinist"..Calvinism is not sound theology
@ChristRoseFromTheDead
You’re revealing a Roman Catholic or possibly Eastern Orthodox view of salvation, not a Protestant or biblical Reformed one and that isn't sound theology.
Brother, I’m not here to defend Calvin, Augustine, or any system — only what Scripture says.
I don’t claim loyalty to Calvin, Luther, or any system — only to Christ and His Word.BS. You're a Calvinist to the bone
I don’t claim loyalty to Calvin, Luther, or any system — only to Christ and His Word.Calvinism is not sound theology
Let’s put aside man-made categories and compare doctrine with the Word itself:
I don’t claim loyalty to Calvin, Luther, or any system — only to Christ and His Word.
I don’t claim loyalty to Calvin, Luther, or any system — only to Christ and His Word.Meaningless. Your theology is embued with Calvinist ideas.
Your responses reveal a Roman Catholic or possibly Eastern Orthodox view of salvation, not a Protestant or biblical Reformed one. That is not sound theology.Meaningless. Your theology is embued with Calvinist ideas.
I don’t claim loyalty to Calvin, Luther, or any system — only to Christ and His Word.
If something I say aligns with Scripture, then the source isn’t Calvinism — it’s truth. And if it doesn’t align with Scripture, then it should be rejected, no matter who said it.
The issue isn’t whether an idea sounds “Calvinist,” “Catholic,” or “Arminian,” but whether it’s biblically true.
Acts 17:11 praises the Bereans because they “searched the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.” That’s all I’m trying to do — to measure every teaching, mine included, by the Word of God.
Grace and Peace
Our backgrounds aren’t the standard of truth — Scripture is.It doesn't matter what you claim loyalty to, it matters how you were taught, and you were obviously trained in Calvinist thinking