Searching For Truth Seekers!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
The Truth about Muhammad
1) The messsage of Islam is intertwined with its messanger. Allegiance to one implies allegiance to the other.
2) Muslims who question Allah are usually tolerated by other Muslims, but questioning Muhammad is grounds for excommunication or worse.
3) Islamic theology has accorded him the title "al-Insan al-Kamil", which translates to "the man who has attained perfection".
4) Because of hadith and tradition, Muslim religion, culture, heritage, and identity all find their core in the person of Muhammad.
5) Muslims see an attack on Muhammad's character as equivalent to a personal attack on them and everything they stand for.
6) Islam comes from the same Arabic root word that means "peace". According to Muslims, the life of Muhammad reflects this.
7) According to Muslims, on the day that Muhammad conquered Mecca, Muhammad forgave meccans despite their horrific treatment of Muslims.
8) According to Muslims, the other battles Muhammad fought were all defensive.
9) According to Muslims, Muhammad knew about subjects like embryology, astronomy, and geology, knowledge he could have attained only if Allah had revealed it to him. However, there are problems with many of the Quranic verses that are obvious to physicians and other scientists. For example, The Quran 23: 13-14 reads, "Then we made him a sperm in a fixed lodging. Then we made the sperm a hanging (thing), then we made the hanging into a chewed (thing), then we made the chewed into bones, then we clothed the bones with flesh, then we developed it into another crreation, so blessed be Allah, the best of creators." The verse explains the sequential development of an embryo, but the sequence is incorrect. An embryo does not first become bones to be later clothed with flesh. One layer of an embryo, the mesoderm, differentiates into bone and flesh at the same time.
10) The Quran: 9.5 But when the forbidden (four) months are over, then fight and kill the (distrusted) pagans wherever you find them, and catch them, attack them, and stay waiting for them in every stage (of war); But if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then make it easy for them: Verily, Allah is Often Forgiving , Most Merciful.
11) The hadiths ( stories, sayings, rituals and traditions attributed to Mohammad) were written 200 to 250 years after Muhammad. From Muhammad to that time the stories were passed down orally.
12) Almost everything Muslims know about Muhammad comes to them orally, rarely from primary sources.
13) Unlike Christians learning about Jesus from the Bible, the Quran has very little to say about Muhammad.
14) The earliest records of Muhammad's life expressly admit that they have intentional alterations.
15) Muhammad's first biography, "Sirat Rasul Allah" by Ibn Ishaq comes down to our day only through the transmission of a later biographer, Ibn Hisham.
16) In his introduction, Ibn Hisham explains that he altered the story of Muhammad's life. "Things which it is disgraceful to discuss, matters which would distress certain people, and such reports as [my teacher] told me he could not accept as trustworthy--all these things I have omitted." Found in Ibn Hisham's notes; Guillaume, Life of Muhammad, page 691.
17) The hadith Sahih Bukhari consists of 9 volumes that almost all Muslims consider the most historically authentic.
18) In the first volume, the third hadith, Muhammad's first revelation in the Cave of Hira, instead of recounting that the angel simply asked Muhammad to recite, Muhammad reports that " the angel caught me forcefully and pressed me so hard that I could not bear it anymore." Each time the angel asked Muhammad to recite, the angel applied unbearable pressure. After his encounter with the angel, Muhammad returned to his wife terrified, his "heart beating severely."
19) Volume 9 hadith 111 (9.1110 describes the same event. It said that when Muhammad saw Gabriel, his "neck muscles twitched in terror," and when Gabriel had gone for a while, the Prophet became so depressed "that he intended several times to throw himself from the top of high mountains and every time he went up the top of a mountain in order to throw himself down, Gabriel would apppear before him and say, ' O Muhammad. You are indeed Allah's Apostle in truth, whereupon his heart would become quiet and he would calm down."
20) In Volume 1 hadith 24, Muhammad says , " I have been ordered by Allah to fight against people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity...then they will save their lives and property from me."
21) The previous statement (#20) contradicts the Quran's clear statement that "there is no compulsion in religion."
22) Volume 1 hadith 25 says that the greatest thing a Muslim can do after having faith is to engage in jihad. As if to clarify what kind of jihad, Sahih Bukhari clarifies, "religious fighting."
23) In Guillaume's, Life of Muhammad, the translator used Ibn Hisham's abridgement of Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah. On page 676 Muhammad ordered a warrior to assassinate a mother of five, Asma bint Marwan. She was breastfeeding a child when she was murdered, her blood splattering on her children. When the assassin told Muhammad he had difficulty with what he had done, Muhammad showed no remorse.
24) In Guillaume's, Life of Muhammad, page 464: in the aftermath of the Battle of the Trench, Muhammad captured and beheaded over 500 men and teenage boys from the Jewish tribe of Quraya. After the Muslims killed the men, they sold the women and children into slavery and distributed their goods among themselves.
25) This account is also found in both hadith and sirah (biographies).
26) Islam commands Muslims to have no more than 4 wives at a time, Yet Mahammad had at least 7 at one point. The Quran 33;50 says Muhammad had special privilege.
27) According to Sahih Bukhari, volume 7, hadith 62.64, 62.65, and 62.88 and Sahih Muslim 8.3310 and8.3311 Aisha was 6 when Muhammad married her, and he consummated the marriage with her 3 years later, when he was 52.
28) Muhammad had been poisoned; on his deathbed, he felt as if the poison was killing him; he had black magic cast on him. Sahih Bukhari volume 3 hadith 47 verse 786 (3.47.786). Also 5.59.713 and 4.54.490.
29) He revealed versus he later admitted had been from Satan. Guillaume's Life of Muhammad pages 165-166.
30) He tortured people for money. Ibid.,515
31) He led an attack on unarmed Jews. Sahih Bukhari 1.11.584
32) He caused his adopted son to divorce so he could marry his daughter-in-law, Zaiab. Quran 33.37; Sahih Muslim 8.3330; Tabari volume 8, pages 2-3
33) He told people to drink camel's urine. Sahih Bukhari 8.82.794; Sahih Muslim 16.4130
34) In the 1940s Martin Lings, an English scholar who converted to Sufi Islam, wrote an internationally acclaimed, comprehensive, and authoritative account of the life of Muhammad the prophet. The title of the book is "Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources" It has been published in12 languages, and has received numerous awards, including acknowledgement as best biography of the prophet in English at the National Seerate Conference in Islamabad. The conference was attended by Muslim clerics from around the world. The chapter titled "The Threshold of War" seems to say that it was the Muslims who were the first aggressors against Mecca after Muhammad had migrated to Medina. Muhammad sent 8 Muslims to lie in wait for a Meccan trade caravan during the holy month. Even though this was a time of sacred truce for Arabs, the Muslims killed one man, captured2 others, and plundered their goods.
31) Most Muslims have a copy of the Quran but have never read any of the hadiths themselves. What they know about Muhammad is what they hear orally from a person called an Imam who leads them in prayer to Allah and tells them sugarcoated stories about Muhammad.
32) How can a man like Muhammad be a prophet of God? He certainly wasn't a man who had attained perfection. I hope this helps you understand what kind of man Muslims ignorantly glorify.

33) All of this information comes from a book written by a devout Muslim who converted to Christianity, Nabeel Qureshi. The title of the book is " Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus.

Thanks for this summary. The key item that makes Islam anti-Christ is #20:

In Volume 1 hadith 24, Muhammad says , " I have been ordered by Allah to fight against people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity...then they will save their lives and property from me."

IOW, the reason Muslims are so numerous is because of coercion and Christianicide combined with a high birth rate. Preaching the Gospel is disallowed in Muslim and Marxist countries, which tells us all we need to know.
 
Catholic Mistake #26
The RCC and the Eucharist
The eucharist in the RCC is a celebration of mass, or in other words taking communion with bread and wine. The tradition comes from Luke 22: 19-20 And He took bread, and gave thanks, and broke it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you. This do in remembrance of me. Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. So, we are supposed to break bread and sip wine as a remembrance to Jesus. The key word here is remembrance. Now this is where it gets really strange. The RCC have taken these verses to mean something entirely different than just remembrance. Catholics believe their priests have the power to put a blessing on the bread and wine that transforms it into the literal body and blood of Jesus Christ. You heard me right, the actual body and blood of Jesus Christ. This is known as transubstantiation. Catholics consume it thinking it's supposed to have magical powers that will bless them. Here it is from the catechism. 1376 The Council of Trent summarizes the Catholic faith by declaring: "Because Christ our Redeemer said that it was truly His body that He was offering under the species of bread, it has always been the conviction of the Church of God, and this holy Council now declares again, that by the consecration of the bread and wine there takes place a change of the whole substance of the bread into the substance of the body of Christ our Lord and of the whole substance of the wine into the substance of his blood. This change the holy Catholic Church has fittingly and properly called transubstantiation." This is wrong on so many levels where do I begin? First off, Jesus Christ died on the cross for us once. John 19: 30 "When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed His head, and gave up the ghost." So every time the catholic church has a mass, and there have been millions of them over the centuries, they are re-sacrificing Jesus' blood and body. The reason is that since sin is continually committed by people, Jesus has to be continually re-sacrificed. Rom 6:10 For in that he died, he died unto sin once; but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God. Acts 15: 20 "But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood."Gen 9: 4 But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat. Remember that the RCC believes they are turning wine into blood and then they proceed to drink it. So any catholic who has participated in a mass ceremony, has broken the word of God. What! Are catholics a bunch of vampires drinking blood? And they also believe that they are eating the real body of Jesus. So are catholics also cannibals eating human flesh? This is ridiculous and absurd. There is no such teaching in the Bible. Jesus simply told us to remember Him. How in the world did they come up with the idea that they are literally eating and drinking our savior. The RCC teaching that the bread and wine are the literal body and blood of Jesus is a man-made tradition of the catholic church that is found nowhere in the Bible.
 
Catholic Mistake #27
The RCC and Infant Baptism
Infant baptism isn't just in the catholic church. It is in many different denominations. Here it is in the catechism: 1250 Born with a fallen human nature and tainted by original sin, children also have need of the new birth in Baptism to be freed from the power of darkness and brought into the realm of the freedom of the children of God, to which all men are called. The sheer gratuitousness of the grace of salvation is particularly manifest in infant Baptism. The Church and the parents would deny a child the priceless grace of becoming a child of God were they not to confer Baptism shortly after birth. 1251 Christian parents will recognize that this practice also accords with their role as nurturers of the life that God has entrusted to them. 1252 The practice of infant Baptism is an immemorial tradition of the Church. There is explicit testimony to this practice from the second century on, and it is quite possible that, from the beginning of the apostolic preaching, when whole "household" received baptism, infants may also have been baptized. Here is the problem with infant baptism. God wants us to use our free will to choose to be a christian, to choose God over this world, to choose Jesus Christ as our savior. An infant is not old enough to be able to use that free will to choose God. Baptism is for adults who use their free will to get baptized. A little baby has no idea of what's going on when he or she is being baptized. It might make the parents feel good, but it's doing nothing for the baby. Plus, all infants and children up to the age of reason, which many feel it's around 7 or 8, if they die, they instantly go to heaven anyway. Infants and children are automatically saved because they don't understand the concept of sin yet. Often time, catholics will use this excuse for infant baptism. The bible does not contain any scripture against infant baptism. Anyone who says this will try to use this as an excuse. I don't think that they are real christians to begin with. They are deliberately trying to add things to the bible to to make up their own doctrine to fit their own agenda. Christians are supposed to follow what the bible does say, not trying to fiddle around to find things it doesn't say, like infant baptism. Infant baptism is a tradition of the RCC, and other denominations as well, that needs to be stopped. The focus should be on adult baptism, when the person can make an educated descision regarding God and the Bible.
 
Catholic Mistake # 28
The RCC and Holy Water
The Bible talks about holy water in only one verse. Number 5:17 And the priest shall take holy water in an earthen vessel; and of the dust that is in the floor of the tabernacle the priest shall take, and put it into the water. The RCC has perverted the use of the holy water to some crazy ritual that catholics do when they enter a church. It is common practice for Roman catholics to dip their finger in holy water and make the sign of the cross which acts as some kind of blessing or protection. Where did this ritual come from? It's not in the Bible. The Bible says that the priest put dust into the water and not sprinkle yourself with the water. And why are these priest throwing water on people? This is not in the Bible. And the RCC is taking this even further by coming up with all kinds of crazy ways to use holy water. 8 ways to use holy water by Gretchen Filz Aug 12, 2014 : 1) Bless yourself - This suggestion is obvious, but if we are only blessing ourselves with holy water on Sunday, then aren't we missing out on the rest of the week? You can never have too much grace or blessing in your life. Use holy water daily. Keeping a holy water font in the home is a great idea so that you, your family, and guests can be blessed in the comings and goings from your home. Keep the font right by the front door to ensure you never leave home without. 2) Bless your house- If you haven't taken the time to bless your house with holy water, then no time is better than the present. Your home is the domestic Church and is in need of spiritual protection. You can sprinkle holy water in your home yourself, or have a priest formally bless your home using holy water as part of the house blessing ceremony. 3) Bless your family- Use holy water to pray and make the Sign of the Cross over your spouse and children before they go to sleep at night. Bonding the family to each other and to God in this way is a great family tradition to adopt. Keep a holy water bottle by the bedside for this purpose. 4) Bless your work spac- If you work outside of the home, sprinkling your work space with holy water is a great idea, not only for spiritual protection on the work front, but also as to sanctify your daily work for the glory of God. 5) Bless your car- The car is probably the most dangerous place where you spend a significant amount of time each day. Never underestimate the power of the holy water applied to your vehicle to keep you safe from harm's way, when used in faith and trust in God. In fact, you can also h ave a priest bless your car with holy water. 6) Bless your vegetable garden 7) Bless the sick 8) Bless your pets. None of these 8 ways are in the bible. Why does the RCC make up stuff that isn't in the Bible? From the Catholic Faith Store: How to use Holy water: 10 ways to use holy water to sanctify your life. Using holy water the way the RCC does is a man-made tradition of the RCC that is found nowhere in the Bible.
 
Regarding "the reason Muslims are so numerous is because of coercion and Christianicide combined with a high birth rate. Preaching the Gospel is disallowed in Muslim and Marxist countries, which tells us all we need to know".

The same could have be said about countries dominated by Roman Catholics before the Inquisition was ended.
 
Edicts and Councils
1. Initiated in 303 AD by Emperor Diocletian, this was the last and most severe official persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire, aiming to eradicate the rapidly growing Christian faith. Edicts mandated the destruction of churches and scriptures, the arrest and torture of clergy, and eventually, universal sacrifice to Roman gods, punishable by death for refusal.
2. The Edict of Toleration by Emperor Galerius (311 AD) officially ended the Diocletian Persecution in the East and granted Christians the right to exist and assemble peacefully. While an important step, it did not restore confiscated property or grant full religious equality, only toleration.
3. The Edict of Milan in 313 AD by the Roman Emperor of the West, Constantine, and the Roman Emperor of the East, Licinius, not only reaffirmed religious toleration for Christians but also mandated the return of all confiscated Christian property, elevating Christianity's status significantly within the empire.
4. The Council of Nicaea (325 AD) called by the sole emperor of the Roman Empire and sun worshipper, Constantine, and presided over by him to settle the dispute involving the divinity of Jesus Christ. 1800 bishops were invited by only around 300 attended. Arianism is the belief in what Arius of Alexandria believed and taught, that Christ was a created being. The council condemned Arius as a heretic after he refused to sign the formula of faith which stated that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were three persons that made up one God. Constantine then exiled Arius, an act that, while manifesting a solidarity of church and state, underscored the importance of secular patronage in ecclesiastical affairs. All bishops were ordered to preach the Trinity.
5. Through the years,the West became mostly Nicaean, and the East mostly Arian. When the Spanish, and devout Nicaean Theodosius became emperor in 379 AD, he issued the Edict of Thessalonica in 380 AD. The Edict specifically targeted other Christian sects like Arianism, which held different beliefs about the nature of Christ. These were labeled as heresies with both divine and imperial retribution. The theological content follows: "... let us believe in the one deity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, in equal majesty and in a holy Trinity". The edict then transforms this theological definition into a legal status: "We authorize the followers of this law to assume the title of Catholic Christians". For the first time, the state claimed the authority to determine who could legally bear this name. The consequences for those who did not conform were severe: "...but as for the others, since, in our judgement they are foolish madmen, we decree that they shall be branded with the ignominious name of heretics, and shall not presume to give to their conventicles the name of churches". The language is one of utter contempt. It strips non-Nicaean Christians of their religious legitimacy, their property rights as religious bodies, and their identity, recasting them in law as insane deviants. Finally, the edict makes explicit the threat of state-sanctioned violence: "They will suffer in the first place the chastisement of the divine condemnation and in the second the punishment of our authority which in accordance with the will of Heaven we will decide to inflict". This clause is the essence of the new state-church relationship. Theological error was now a civil crime, and the power of the Roman state was officially pledged to persecute religious dissent. The theological content follows: "... let us believe in the one deity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, in equal majesty and in a holy Trinity". The edict then transforms this theological definition into a legal status: "We authorize the followers of this law to assume the title of Catholic Christians". For the first time, the state claimed the authority to determine who could legally bear this name. The consequences for those who did not conform were severe: "...but as for the others, since, in our judgement they are foolish madmen, we decree that they shall be branded with the ignominious name of heretics, and shall not presume to give to their conventicles the name of churches". The language is one of utter contempt. It strips non-Nicaean Christians of their religious legitimacy, their property rights as religious bodies, and their identity, recasting them in law as insane deviants. Finally, the edict makes explicit the threat of state-sanctioned violence: "They will suffer in the first place the chastisement of the divine condemnation and in the second the punishment of our authority which in accordance with the will of Heaven we will decide to inflict". This clause is the essence of the new state-church relationship. Theological error was now a civil crime, and the power of the Roman state was officially pledged to persecute religious dissent. Arian bishops were systematically deposed and expelled, and their churches were handed over to Nicene clergy. Theodocius's imperial decree had become the official doctrine of the Church. Everyone was forced to preach the Trinity under penalty of death. The enforcement of these laws culminated in a grim precedent: in 384 AD, the Spanish ascetic Priscillian and several of his followers were tried and executed by a secular court on charges of heresy, marking the first time that Christians were put to death for their beliefs by a Christian Roman state. The era of toleration was definitely over.
So I counted 9999 characters. Good one. Way to fit it in.
 
Hello everyone. I do not plan to be anything or anyone and in fact I am no more than an ant, if that at all. But G-d gives the gifts He decides to whomever He decides as He sees fit.

I am seeking for those who truly want "unaltered/unfiltered/unadulterated" TRUTH. One must know that the Bible and the New Testament are very deep and profound as the book of Proverbs clearly tells us and this wisdom is in the hands of a few not the masses.

Those who seek truth could be the following:

- Those who know there is much more than they are taught in Church
- Want to grow more but do not know where to turn
- Wanting answers to why there is so much division and hypocrisy in the world
- Those who sin and struggle with sin, yet very deeply in their hearts do not want to, know it is wrong but cannot find ways out
- Those who feel alone and voice is not heard yet know they have message that is genuine and universal for all.
- Those who know the Jewish people are very special and yet know the church goes around the wrong perspective with them

If you'd like answers, I would like to help with G-d's help.
I guess i
Missed why you wanted the “truth seekers” to come to you? Okay, if I was a true truth seeker then tell me how I can get a breakthrough for the salvation of my daughter, and a breakthrough in “direction” for my family. Please give me a verse that does not include fasting and prayer. Thank you. I’ll be waiting for your answer.
 
I guess i
Missed why you wanted the “truth seekers” to come to you? Okay, if I was a true truth seeker then tell me how I can get a breakthrough for the salvation of my daughter, and a breakthrough in “direction” for my family. Please give me a verse that does not include fasting and prayer. Thank you. I’ll be waiting for your answer.

Mikael is MIA, but as a TSer who responded to his call, I am here and I empathize with your concern for your family,
although I have no answer other than to be a good example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Burn1986
I guess i
Missed why you wanted the “truth seekers” to come to you? Okay, if I was a true truth seeker then tell me how I can get a breakthrough for the salvation of my daughter, and a breakthrough in “direction” for my family. Please give me a verse that does not include fasting and prayer. Thank you. I’ll be waiting for your answer.

John 14:13 and John 16: 23-24 When Jesus went back up to heaven to get glorified, he received from the Father a spiritual body made up of the souls of saved Christians who have received the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is God's Glory. The Holy Spirit is a portal hrough which the Son can enter the being indwelled. Since the Son is the temple of the Father, when the Son enters our beings, so does the Father. The Father chooses who to give to the Son for his spiritual body. The Son gets glorified when he baptizes a believer with the Holy Spirit. Both enter our beings and both are glorified. When Jesus said to ask anything in his name to the Father, he meant praying to the Father for the salvation of a loved one so that both Father and Son can get glorified through the Holy Spirit. Ask the Father in Jesus's name, have faith that it will be accomplished, and it will.
 
Catholic Mistake # 29
The pope, evolution, and the Big Bang
A few years ago (2014) Pope Francis came out saying that evolution and the big bang are real. Pope Francis has waded into the controversial debate over the origins of human life saying the big bang theory did not contradict the role of a divine creator, but even required it. He also stated that God is not a magician with a magic wand.
I'm not sure if the pope hit his head and is not thinking straight or to any other christian who believes in evolution and the big bang theory, I think you might have hit your head as well. Let's clear this up and compare evolution with creation from the Bible. Evolution claims that the Big Bang happened 15 billion years ago. Then the stars formed. Then the sun formed and 4.5 billion years ago the molten earth evolved, the first oceans evolved. You see there is no creation here. There is no hand of God. everything evolved on its own. It's the magic of science, not the power of God. It took roughly 11 billion years for the earth to evolve into its form according to evolution. According to the Bible, it took God only one day, the third day, to form the earth. What about people? Evolution says that it took 3 billion years to get humans to our present form. The origin of life or the tree of life states that the first cell started in the ocean three billion years ago. Then ocean life evolved. Then fish jumped up onto the land to form land animals. Then land animals formed into different species, and then finally apes evolved into man. But the Bible states that God created man from the dust of the ground. Gen 2: 7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. It took God only one day ( the sixth day) to create man. So evolution states that it took 3 billion years for man to evolve through the power of science, but the Bible says that through the power of God, He created man in only one day. The pope coming out and saying that the big bang and evolution are real is truly a shame because it just shows that either he doesn't know the Bible very well or is trying to take away the power of God on purpose for some evil agenda.
 
You should make better use of your time. LOL
He must have been joking? It was nowhere near that many characters.

Fact check ~ I used a character counter and even with your formatting? Close to half of what he said.
 
John 14:13 and John 16: 23-24 When Jesus went back up to heaven to get glorified, he received from the Father a spiritual body made up of the souls of saved Christians who have received the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is God's Glory. The Holy Spirit is a portal hrough which the Son can enter the being indwelled. Since the Son is the temple of the Father, when the Son enters our beings, so does the Father. The Father chooses who to give to the Son for his spiritual body. The Son gets glorified when he baptizes a believer with the Holy Spirit. Both enter our beings and both are glorified. When Jesus said to ask anything in his name to the Father, he meant praying to the Father for the salvation of a loved one so that both Father and Son can get glorified through the Holy Spirit. Ask the Father in Jesus's name, have faith that it will be accomplished, and it will.
Well the thread was lame anyway. Thanks for taking it a little lower.
 
Seeking truth should not be deemed lame, although I agree that some of that post was lame/not true.
Seeking truth isn’t duh. But saying “if you really want truth then let me know and I will give you new and unadulterated pure truth.” Then, we have some poster giving his version of a couple of verses, that in no way answered a question about salvation or spiritual breakthrough.
 
Seeking truth isn’t duh. But saying “if you really want truth then let me know and I will give you new and unadulterated pure truth.” Then, we have some poster giving his version of a couple of verses, that in no way answered a question about salvation or spiritual breakthrough.

Oh yeah, sorry I misunderstood you. My focus was on the searching for truthseekers title.
 
Catholic Mistake # 30
The RCC and the Lucifer telescope
The vatican observatory research group operates the Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope at the Mount Graham International Observatory in southeastern Arizona. There is another telescope there named Lucifer. Now the RCC claims that they don't own the Lucifer Telescope, but are working with the Lucifer telescope. So I guess since they don't own it, it's okay to work with something called Lucifer. Really? I thought christians are supposed to work with Jesus Christ our Savior and to avoid the darkness and have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them or, in other words, but rather expose them. The RCC should have been opposed to working with something called Lucifer, and the protest should have been all over the news. Yet everything is silent and they are happily working with the Lucifer telescope.
 
These Catholic mistakes are from an article written by Chamath Silva. I'm not sure about this next Catholic mistake.
Catholic Mistake # 31
The birth of the Trinity
The Jews believe in a one person God. Duet 6: 4 Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord defines Israel's national creed. In Mark 12: 29-30 states that loving that loving the Lord thy God is the first commandment. Nowhere in the Bible is a triune God mentioned or hinted at. The trio of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are mentioned in the New Testament, but never hinted at or declared that they were the same being. For sure, Jesus's mind was different from the Father's when he prayed to the Father that not his will be done, but the Father's. In Mark 12: 35-37 The Lord speaking is the Father, and the second Lord, "my Lord", is Christ. That is two distinct beings that have existed even during the time of David. The RCC adopted the Trinity concept in 325 AD at the Council of Nicaea and included it in their Nicene Creed, and confirmed it at the Council of Constantinople. Emperor Constantine, who was a sun worshiper, ordered that Christian bishops had to teach that the Father and Son were the same being. The Holy Spirit was added as the third person of the Trinity at the Council of Constantinople. During the reign of Nicene Emperor Theodocius in 379 AD, in his edict of Thessalonica, he declared that the Trinity had to be taught throughout the Roman empire, and anyone teaching anything different would be punished by the Roman government. This punishment would include confiscation of property and death. The effect of this edict is still felt today.
 
At the end of her article Chamath Silva wrote,
So in conclusion, after researching the information for this video, it leaves me with the impression that the RCC is getting away with murder, so to speak. They call themselves Christians, yet almost everything they do is opposite of what the Bible teaches. It appears that the RCC is trying to supersede the Bible and make up their own rules. A true Christian trusts and follows the Bible 100%, but it appears that the RCC does not. Look, you can either follow what the Bible says and be a christian, or you can follow the pope and man-made traditions of the RCC and think you are a christian. So are catholics christians? It appears that based on this information, they are not.