Glad we finally agree Typinator isn’t AI. Took a while, but we got there. As for the rest — no hard feelings. Let’s stick to Scripture next time instead of side shows and using AI to write your post for you.
Grace and Peace
As I said, you're a little slow. After you finally disclosed your Typinator use, I looked at it and quickly knew what it was. I never said Typinator was AI.
Let's get real here. From the outset it was clear to me you were automated. It looks like and formats like AI. When I first posted to your first post, I was intrigued and thought it would be interesting interacting with your routine, whatevr it was.
Using Typinator
does not mean you do not use AI also. It just means you use Typinator.
Much of your output also looks like AI - a search confirms Typinator can look like AI - and as far as I know you have yet to answer any questions about using AI. You said you like tech. I do too and have used Bible software for probably 30 years. It's hard for me to even use books anymore. Liking tech, it's unconvincing that you do not use AI at all, and at this time I do not believe you that you had an IT friend check AI re: my work. It's very simple to do. It literally just takes copying and pasting a post into AI and asking it to analyze for signs of AI use.
Tell me you don't know how to do this.
So, if you do or do not use AI or anything else for that matter, just answer simple questions and be done with it and stop being a drama-queen. It really doesn't matter if you're using it or not. It's part of the deal today no matter who likes or dislikes it. What matters is honesty.
Re: honesty, IMO it's already clear you're being dishonest. That became very clear from the misuse of scholars materials and not being willing to admit it was a mistake [or worse]. As I said, IMO you have zero credibility. You can turn that towards me as much as you like - it really doesn't matter what you think about my credibility.
As for the "no hard feelings." It's not a matter of feelings for me. This isn't emotional. This is just facts. This morning I see on the News threads that you're following me around posting there linking back to the Bible thread to say I use AI. Do you think they care if I do or do not? Again, if it wasn't clear to you that I do use it at times, as I did to post an AI output identified as AI output
to you personally, and as I did and identified
to you personally in the research about your
supposed scholars references, then your comprehension is severely in doubt.
I've been using AI to do research. I've tested it from many angles on theology. It'll bring forth theology from any system of theology I've tested it for. My concern at the moment is that one has to know some theology or can be easily mislead because AI will pick some system and assume it for you in answering questions. I've encountered it jumping back and forth between different systems, getting confused as to what system I'm discussing from, making mistakes and going off-track, and other things. Very honestly, it reminds me of you at times. THIS IS NOT an accusation. This is just reality about being too far invested in tech like AI or Typinator at this point in time. We're transitioning to more tech and the non-tech mind is still the norm and notices somethings different when dealing with tech responses.
In closing, to be very clear, I don't trust you one bit. This isn't emotion, it's just an open admission and notice. Also, your posted responses re: Scripture routinely end up filled with fallacious argumentation very quickly. I know the Biblical Greek language and I know to look for logical fallacies in discussion. We all make mistakes, but we don't all rely heavily on fallacy to pretend outwardly or inwardly to win arguments.
Back to Scripture would be good. But having said all the above, I can't expect you not to respond to whatever degree you'd like to. I exercise patience to get to productivity. At some point the ignore function works well for me. I don't like using it, but in some cases it becomes a necessity.
