Like I said. You don't understand. We are saved by faith (alone) apart from the merit of works (Romans 4:5-6) yet genuine faith does not remain (alone) apart from the presence of works. (James 2:14-24)Sounds like more faith is not alone.
Like I said. You don't understand. We are saved by faith (alone) apart from the merit of works (Romans 4:5-6) yet genuine faith does not remain (alone) apart from the presence of works. (James 2:14-24)Sounds like more faith is not alone.
In Hebrews 11, we see that it was by or "out of" faith that these people accomplished works and not faith "is" in essence these works, as works-salvationists teach. Faith alone still stands. (Romans 4:5-6; Ephesians 2:8,9)
It's misunderstood. We are saved by faith that trusts in Jesus Christ "alone" for salvation (Romans 4:5-6) which is not to be confused with a bare profession of faith that remains "alone" - barren of works. (James 2:14)
Like I said. You don't understand. We are saved by faith (alone) apart from the merit of works (Romans 4:5-6) yet genuine faith does not remain (alone) apart from the presence of works. (James 2:14-24)
I applaud your patience and knowledge.Heb11 doesn’t use ek pisteōs (“out of faith”) - it uses pistei, the dative, meaning “by” or “in” faith. So at best, the idea that works come “out of” faith you're importing from elsewhere. Hebrews shows faith functioning as obedient allegiance - very informative for how Scripture frames pistis as not "alone".
It is a rather simple question.Chosen of God unable? From where do you get these gross misrepresentations?
Not faith "alone" in the sense that you keep referring to. Whether by, in or out of faith, the bottom line is faith produces works and faith is not works. Throughout Hebrews 11, "by faith" describes the method or means by which the actions of faith were performed. Faith is instrumental means through which the actions were performed, rather than the actions themselves. Genuine faith is not passive and did lead to actions appropriate their faith in Hebrews 11, but their actions were not inherent in their faith. The actions of believers are presented as proof of their faith. We show our faith by our works. (James 2:18)Heb11 doesn’t use ek pisteōs (“out of faith”) - it uses pistei, the dative, meaning “by” or “in” faith. So at best, the idea that works come “out of” faith you're importing from elsewhere. Hebrews shows faith functioning as obedient allegiance - very informative for how Scripture frames pistis as not "alone".
Faith that trusts in Jesus Christ "alone" for salvation is not misleading. What part of God imputes righteousness apart from works and saved by grace through faith, not works (Romans 4:5-6; Ephesians 2:8,9) can't you grasp? I already defined pistis using Hebrews 11:1 and the Strongs Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, but that was not good enough for you because you are only interested in your own personal definition.If saving faith must not remain alone, then the slogan ‘faith alone’ is already misleading. Again, the issue isn’t misunderstanding - it’s misdefinition. And while you repeat those verses, neither of them defines pistis.
Let me guess. You have your own personal definition of non-meritorious works that you "add" to salvation through faith, not works. Works-salvationists come up with all kinds of smoke screens and sugar-coated double talk in order to justify trying to "shoehorn" works "into" salvation through faith, not works.You’re importing “works” into a discussion about how faith-alone theology misdefines pistis. The issue isn’t merit - it’s whether pistis includes what faith-alone theology and its slogan wrongly label “works.”
Faith that trusts in Jesus Christ "alone" for salvation is not misleading. .
You can have all kinds of knowledge yet still be wrong about critical, Biblical issues. 2 Timothy 3:15 - and how from infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. My experience in the RCC opened my eyes to a lot of false teachings. Also, the false gospel of the CoC is the result of bad semantics and flawed hermeneutics. My faith rests in Jesus Christ alone for salvation. (1 John 5:11-13) Praise God!I applaud your patience and knowledge.
But mailmandan is a dyed in the wool faith alone regeneration theology pusher regardless of the facts. His insistence that his personal experience in the Roman Catholic Church is germane to the discussion is a sign of poor hermeneutics.
Have you placed your faith in Jesus Christ alone for salvation? Are you trusting in the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ as the ALL-sufficient means of your salvation or are you trusting in your imperfect obedience/works to save you?Faith that trusts in justification alone, apart from obedience, is most definitely misleading
This question would be better asked of you. Are you obeying faith alone regeneration theology or the Jesus of the Bible?Have you placed your faith in Jesus Christ alone for salvation? Are you trusting in the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ as the ALL-sufficient means of your salvation or are you trusting in your imperfect obedience/works to save you?
Have you placed your faith in Jesus Christ alone for salvation? Are you trusting in the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ as the ALL-sufficient means of your salvation or are you trusting in your imperfect obedience/works to save you?
I'm sorry, but that wisecrack at the end really made me laugh!This question would be better asked of you. Are you obeying faith alone regeneration theology or the Jesus of the Bible?
It seems you are doing the former. Your insistence on defining general statements as all-encompassing is troubling. The absurdity of your reasoning is rather obvious.
Faith Alone Regeneration Theology is a theology without an example. A theology based on shoehorning a grammatical definitive into the verbiage of rather general statements. This is childish and puts all scripture at risk.
Something must have happened to you in the Roman Catholic Church that you are suppressing and using this theology as a coping mechanism.
You did not answer my questions. I have no trouble answering both of those questions.False framing. It's not faith or works; it's fake faith which trusts in justification only or genuine faith that trusts Jesus and obeys his word.
You did not answer my questions. I have no trouble answering both of those questions.
I have placed my faith in Jesus Christ alone for salvation and I'm trusting in the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ as the ALL-sufficient means of my salvation. I am not trusting in works for salvation "in addition" to trusting in Jesus Christ for salvation.
See how easy that was for me to answer those questions yet so difficult for you?
You corrected nothing and instead, dodged my questions, which is very telling.I don't answer questions based on false framings. I correct the framing and answer.
Does the phrase, "saved by faith" equivalent to the term, "saved by faith alone"?