You put words in the mouth of Peter by "adding" water baptism to Acts 10:43 according to your eisegesis. Acts 10:43 - Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name (expression of authority and not a salvation baptismal formula) everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins. Not mention of water baptism in Acts 10:43.AGAIN, you misquote Peter's statement in Acts 10:43.
Once again, Acts 10:43 - Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name (EXPRESSION OF AUTHORITY AND NOT A SALVATION BAPTISMAL FORMULA) everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins. Those who believe in Jesus (exclusively in Jesus) and not in Jesus + something else, namely, water baptism. If you truly believed in Jesus then you would be trusting in the death, burial and resurrection of Christ as the ALL-sufficient means of your salvation. (Acts 15:7-9)In doing so, many fail to grasp the significance of what Peter actually said. He said, "...IT IS THROUGH HIS NAME (Jesus) those who believe in Jesus shall RECEIVE REMISSION OF SIN.
More eisegesis on your part. That is NOT what Peter said in Acts 10:43. Remission of sins is connected with BELIEVES IN HIM in Acts 10:43. Water baptism "followed." Your Oneness Pentecostal error has already been corrected numerous times.Remission of sin is connected with obedience to water baptism IN THE NAME OF THE JESUS.
https://carm.org/oneness-pentecostal/must-baptism-be-in-jesus-name-baptize/
Yes, (key word) AFTER receiving the Holy Spirit (which demonstrates AFTER they were saved) the group was commanded to be baptized in water. The group had already believed, received the Holy Spirit and spoke in tongues all BEFORE receiving water baptism.After receiving the Holy Spirit the group was commanded to be baptized in water in the name of Jesus. (Acts 10:47-48)
More eisegesis on your part. Now in regard to Acts 2:38 go back and read post #355 over again until the truth finally sinks in.Why? Because in addition to being indwelt with the Holy Ghost the group had to have their sins dealt with. Again, this parallels with the initial gospel message presented at Pentecost. (Acts 2:38)
Yes, simply believed with no mention of water baptism, yet you just can't seem to put down your shoehorn.As to Acts 4:4, 5:14. The scriptures reference they heard the word and believed.
In Acts 2:38, "for the remission of sins" does not refer back to both clauses, "you all repent" and "each one of you be baptized," but refers only to the first. Peter is saying "repent unto the remission of your sins," the same as in Acts 3:19. The clause "each one of you be baptized" is parenthetical. This is exactly what Acts 3:19 teaches except that Peter omits the parenthesis.Note, Acts 2:41-42 indicate that the people believed Peter's word and were baptized, and the people continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine. What doctrine? The doctrine just presented by Peter in Acts 2:38.
The only logical conclusion when properly harmonizing scripture with scripture is that faith in Jesus Christ "implied in genuine repentance" (rather than water baptism) brings the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit (Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 5:31; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:8,9; 16:31; 26:18). *Perfect Harmony*
Once again, in regard to Acts 2:41, those who gladly received his word (upon repentance/faith) were "afterwards" baptized. Nothing is mentioned here about water baptism being the direct cause of the 3,000 souls being added. It simply says those who received his word were baptized. In John 1:12, we read - But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name. *What happened to baptism?
Acts 4:4 - However, many of those who heard the word believed; and the number of the men came to be about five thousand. *What happened to baptism?
Acts 5:14 - And believers were increasingly added to the Lord, multitudes of both men and women. *What happened to baptism? *Hermeneutics.
Water baptism is a command for those who believe and are saved. (Acts 10:43-47)To say water baptism was not commanded because every scripture does not mention it is simply not true.
We know elsewhere that repentance (change of mind) precedes believe him/believe the gospel/faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. (Matthew 21:32; Mark 1:15; Acts 20:21) Repentance does not need to be specifically spelled out in scripture whenever we see belief/faith connected with receiving salvation because repentance and belief/faith are two sides to the same coin. Where you have one you must have the other. Not so with baptism. You can repent and believe the gospel and not yet be water baptized. Receiving the Holy Spirit does not specifically need to be spelled out in scripture either every time whenever we see belief/faith connected with receiving salvation because we know elsewhere that saved believers receive the Holy Spirit. (Acts 11:17; 15:8,9; Ephesians 1:13)Consider that repentance nor receiving the Holy Ghost is specifically mentioned within those scriptures either. Yet, we know they are essential as stated elsewhere in the word.
Your 2-3 cherry picked scriptures based on your eisegesis does not harmonize with the rest of scripture.The truth is witnessed/established by at least 2-3 scriptures.