By touch also. But the words and types of animals were limited and expanded later. It was like teaching a baby to speak for God.Did Adam name the animals according to the sounds they made?
By touch also. But the words and types of animals were limited and expanded later. It was like teaching a baby to speak for God.Did Adam name the animals according to the sounds they made?
Matthew 5:22stupid stupid stupid.
Nothing in the text suggests Adam touched the animals to name them.By touch also. But the words and types of animals were limited and expanded later. It was like teaching a baby to speak for God.
Good question.Did Adam name the animals according to the sounds they made?
What do you mean that the types of animals were expanded? When did it occur?By touch also. But the words and types of animals were limited and expanded later. It was like teaching a baby to speak for God.
have you had a nice day todayMatthew 5:22
But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be answerable to the court; and whoever says to his brother, ‘You good-for-nothing,’ shall be answerable to the supreme court; and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ shall be guilty enough to go into the fiery hell.
Did Adam name the animals according to the sounds they made?
A spiritual interpretation of the Old Testament.I see their nakedness as the loss of God's covering. They knew they had lost it, and were ashamed knowing their disobedience caused it. I have asked that question before, too, about why did they not eat of the Tree of Life? Especially since we are told man is a slave to sin due to his fear of death. Certainly, it seems this was part of their motivation. But if they did not want to die, why not just eat of the Tree promising Life? Well, they also wanted to be like God, and God confirmed that happened, in knowing good and evil. They decided for themselves what was right and what was wrong... Adam deliberately choosing wrong, and Eve being deceived. God temporarily covered them, with the skin/s of a sacrificed animal, foreshadowing the covering we find in the shed righteous blood of Christ. There is a lot to unpack there! Then begins the long hard crawl through history to where we are today...
Thank you, Inquisitor. That is very kind of you to say...A spiritual interpretation of the Old Testament.
That is the way we are supposed to read the text.
Well done Magenta.
me thinks when adam was free in spirit he knew what the animals where saying,.and he asked them what they would like to be called.Did Adam name the animals according to the sounds they made?
I just woke up and replied.have you had a nice day today
Stroll on cherry blossom
oh well this may helpI just woke up and replied.
I will tell you much later whether I have had a nice day.
He should have told the serpent to stroll on.me thinks when adam was free in spirit he knew what the animals where saying,.and he asked them what they would like to be called.
Stroll on cherry blossom
Did Adam name the animals according to the sounds they made?
Well he may of done if his wife wasn't so intrigued with innocenceHe should have told the serpent to stroll on.
Nothing in the New Testament says the bread wasn't leavened, but it wasn't.Nothing in the text suggests Adam touched the animals to name them.
Did Adam name the animals according to the sounds they made?
After the flood or even before, there may have been the need for new words. There would be a need anyway.What do you mean that the types of animals were expanded? When did it occur?
You are changing the subject. And unleavened bread was spoken of often, for very specificNothing in the New Testament says the bread wasn't leavened, but it wasn't.
Smelling would be too. Don't forget that.You are changing the subject. And unleavened bread was spoken of often.
Never was touching the animals mentioned as part of the naming process.